Student-Loan Debt Is Strangling Gen X

cawacko

Well-known member
We hear about student loan debt all the time when it comes to Millennials and Gen Z, but rarely in reference to Gen X. I’m Gen X, and I can’t recall a single conversation with people my age that revolved around student debt.



Student-Loan Debt Is Strangling Gen X

Free-flowing student loans promised upward mobility. Instead, they left the ‘forgotten generation’ with a mountain of debt and regret; ‘I’m going to be working until the day I die.’


One of the most enduring relationships of Rick Betancur’s adult life is with his student debt.

The federal loans have followed him for more than 26 years, longer than he’s been married. While his family has doubled with the addition of two children, his $74,000 in graduate school debt has more than quadrupled to $300,000.

When the 55-year-old New Jersey chiropractor looks at his current balance, he is stupefied. He’s made enough payments toward the loan throughout the years to cover the initial amount he borrowed, but it’s been buried in decades of mounting interest.

His balance continues to accrue interest—and repercussions, most recently the denial of a home-equity loan application. Decades of payments meant Betancur wasn’t able to save for retirement until later in life. Today he has a little over $200,000 saved, a fraction of the seven times one’s salary Fidelity Investments recommends workers have by 55.

Gen X is barreling toward retirement with an excruciating student-loan burden. The six million-plus borrowers aged 50 to 61 have the highest average balance of any age group, at $47,857, according to Federal Student Aid data. Now, as parents and grandparents, they are passing along a skepticism toward higher education and its hefty price tag, part of the broader unraveling of America’s “college for all” ideology.

Student loan debt per borrower, by age group​


The oldest Gen Xers were born in 1965, the same year the Higher Education Act created the modern student-loan system. The baby boomers older than them didn’t have the same access, and the millennials younger than them had greater awareness of the long shadow debt can cast. But for a brief window when the “forgotten generation” was reaching college age, student loans conveyed all of the promise of American upward mobility with none of the pitfalls.

“Back then college was a must,” said Betancur. “You were either going to college or sweeping floors.”

Decades later, the promise is an albatross for many, thanks in part to years of student-loan policy changes, conflicting information from servicers and system backlogs. And it’s becoming more burdensome as the instability of America’s student-loan apparatus comes into sharp focus.

The Education Department under President Trump has threatened to confiscate wages from millions of borrowers if they haven’t made payments since the pandemic, when the Biden administration extended the pause on student-debt repayment. A new tax-and-spending law, signed in July, restricts some borrowing and repayment plans, marking a retreat from federal student lending.

“Repaying federal student loans is not a political football—it’s the law,” an Education Department spokesperson said. “The Trump Administration is providing borrowers with clarity and consistency.” Citing record-high loan defaults and delinquencies, the department in early September announced a new initiative to educate borrowers about the benefits and risks of federal student-loan borrowing.

It has been a particularly jarring shift from the Biden era, when monthly loan payments for low-income borrowers were reduced and a sweeping student-loan forgiveness plan briefly raised hopes for a reprieve before it was blocked.

“Ten to 15 years ago it was widely accepted that student loans were a good form of debt,” said James Kvaal, under secretary of education during the Biden administration. “A lot has changed.”

Expanding access—and debt​

The unpaid federal student-loan balance has swelled to $1.66 trillion, from $516 billion nearly two decades ago. For millions, the loans helped them earn degrees that lifted their earnings potential, making the debt burden more than worth it. But paying it down has strained borrowers of all ages.

That wasn’t what policymakers had in mind 60 years ago when President Johnson signed legislation that opened access to loans, allowing students to sign up for a degree without worrying about whether they could afford it. The rising cost of higher education and the broadening of loan access shifted the scales.

Betancur, whose parents immigrated to the U.S. from South America when he was a toddler, was the first in his family to attend college. He got a full scholarship to study English literature at the College of New Jersey. Later, when he was deciding whether to go to graduate school, a tour guide at Life Chiropractic College West in California encouraged him to take out loans to finance his degree.

“I was excited,” Betancur said. “I was looking at the education and what I was going to do with it, and I wasn’t really thinking about the money.”

That money was especially free-flowing when he was a student. Federal loans went from being a tool for lower-income families to a standard way many people paid for higher education.


A 1981 law had extended the loans to independent undergraduate, graduate and professional students. Two other key changes came in the 1990s: The government introduced direct lending to students, signaling a shift from federally backed loans from private banks. Unsubsidized loans were also added to the mix. While available to everyone regardless of income, the loans put borrowers on the hook for interest accrued while they were in school, as opposed to subsidized loans, where the government covers the interest while they’re enrolled.

Since Betancur’s parents weren’t helping him pay and he was pursuing graduate school, he was eligible for higher borrowing limits. Betancur took the maximum allowable and added private loans to cover the rest. He wasn’t alone.

Between 1990 and 2000, when many Gen Xers were in college, student debt more than doubled, according to the American Council on Education. It also took on a longer life.

When Betancur opened his chiropractic practice in the early 2000s, a loan servicer advised him to put his federal student loans into a payment pause to get his business off the ground, he said. Betancur focused instead on his private loans, which took about 10 years to pay off.

He spent 15 years in and out of forbearance, deferment and repayment on his federal loans. In the years when his business did well, he would make payments toward the debt. When money was tight, he was advised to pause or defer those payments. All the while interest was accruing on his seemingly unchanged balance.

His loans were held by Navient, one of the country’s largest student-loan servicers. Last year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau banned Navient from servicing federal student loans, saying it misled borrowers, processed their payments incorrectly and steered those who may have qualified for income-driven repayment plans into forbearance instead. The company agreed to pay a $120 million fine, but said it didn’t agree with the CFPB’s findings.

Betancur’s federal student-loan payments were always part of an income-driven repayment plan. Though he paid the recommended amount, it was never enough to beat the interest. He resigned himself to the idea that he’d be paying off his student loans for the rest of his life.

From promising to past due​

In 2006, the federal government once again expanded borrowing, allowing graduate and professional students to take out loans up to the total cost of attendance, including tuition, room and board and books.

It coincided with a rise in nontraditional students seeking degrees. That included people older than 24, those employed full-time outside of school and parents like Christopher Fausone.

Fausone got his bachelor’s degree in applied behavior analysis when he was in his 30s to help him as he home-schooled his son, who has autism. Nearly a decade later, he received an M.B.A., hoping it would advance his career.

But the higher-paying roles he dreamed of slipped through his grasp because they required years of work experience, he said.

Today, the 49-year-old lives in Marysville, Wash., and works in commercial pest control. He makes $80,000 a year, and owes around $130,000 in student loans.

Like many borrowers, he hasn’t been paying his loans since the pandemic pause. He focused instead on paying off his car and other debt.

When the pause ended last year and he failed to resume payments, his credit score dropped more than 200 points. Fausone was surprised when he received a notification saying he’d fallen six months behind. He put his loans in a 3-month forbearance.

About five million of the 44.7 million student-loan borrowers are more than 90 days past due, according to Federal Student Aid data. Borrowers who are 50 and older are more likely than other age groups to be seriously delinquent on their loans, according to the New York Fed.

Fausone says he regrets going to graduate school and taking out student loans. He has nothing saved for retirement and doesn’t think he will be able to afford to buy a house. He was hoping to refinance his car to get a lower interest rate, but after his credit score dropped, he believes he wouldn’t qualify.

Now out of forbearance, he worries he won’t be able to keep up with his monthly loan payments and may have some of his paycheck withheld by the government. Loan holders can instruct employers to hold up to 15% of a defaulted borrower’s paycheck.

“I’m going to be working until the day I die,” Fausone said.

Spiraling debt​

Now decades into their adult lives, many Gen Xers have accumulated other types of debt, often causing student-loan payments to fall down the priority list after credit cards and auto and personal loans. The middle-age crunch of caring for both children and parents has added to the load.

Gen X had a median nonmortgage debt of $26,207 as of this year, higher than all other generations, according to a LendingTree analysis of people in the largest 100 metro areas. They also held the highest average credit-card debt last year, at $9,557, according to Experian.



 
We need to stop blaming everything under the sun - including student loans when the real problem is inflation and how human capital has been stolen for a century now.

We have become chattel because we don't know how long we will live AND the cost of core living expenses now rises - it used to fall axiomatically due to human innovation (human capital)
 
We hear about student loan debt all the time when it comes to Millennials and Gen Z, but rarely in reference to Gen X. I’m Gen X, and I can’t recall a single conversation with people my age that revolved around student debt.



Student-Loan Debt Is Strangling Gen X

Free-flowing student loans promised upward mobility. Instead, they left the ‘forgotten generation’ with a mountain of debt and regret; ‘I’m going to be working until the day I die.’


One of the most enduring relationships of Rick Betancur’s adult life is with his student debt.

The federal loans have followed him for more than 26 years, longer than he’s been married. While his family has doubled with the addition of two children, his $74,000 in graduate school debt has more than quadrupled to $300,000.

When the 55-year-old New Jersey chiropractor looks at his current balance, he is stupefied. He’s made enough payments toward the loan throughout the years to cover the initial amount he borrowed, but it’s been buried in decades of mounting interest.

His balance continues to accrue interest—and repercussions, most recently the denial of a home-equity loan application. Decades of payments meant Betancur wasn’t able to save for retirement until later in life. Today he has a little over $200,000 saved, a fraction of the seven times one’s salary Fidelity Investments recommends workers have by 55.

Gen X is barreling toward retirement with an excruciating student-loan burden. The six million-plus borrowers aged 50 to 61 have the highest average balance of any age group, at $47,857, according to Federal Student Aid data. Now, as parents and grandparents, they are passing along a skepticism toward higher education and its hefty price tag, part of the broader unraveling of America’s “college for all” ideology.

Student loan debt per borrower, by age group​


The oldest Gen Xers were born in 1965, the same year the Higher Education Act created the modern student-loan system. The baby boomers older than them didn’t have the same access, and the millennials younger than them had greater awareness of the long shadow debt can cast. But for a brief window when the “forgotten generation” was reaching college age, student loans conveyed all of the promise of American upward mobility with none of the pitfalls.

“Back then college was a must,” said Betancur. “You were either going to college or sweeping floors.”

Decades later, the promise is an albatross for many, thanks in part to years of student-loan policy changes, conflicting information from servicers and system backlogs. And it’s becoming more burdensome as the instability of America’s student-loan apparatus comes into sharp focus.

The Education Department under President Trump has threatened to confiscate wages from millions of borrowers if they haven’t made payments since the pandemic, when the Biden administration extended the pause on student-debt repayment. A new tax-and-spending law, signed in July, restricts some borrowing and repayment plans, marking a retreat from federal student lending.

“Repaying federal student loans is not a political football—it’s the law,” an Education Department spokesperson said. “The Trump Administration is providing borrowers with clarity and consistency.” Citing record-high loan defaults and delinquencies, the department in early September announced a new initiative to educate borrowers about the benefits and risks of federal student-loan borrowing.

It has been a particularly jarring shift from the Biden era, when monthly loan payments for low-income borrowers were reduced and a sweeping student-loan forgiveness plan briefly raised hopes for a reprieve before it was blocked.

“Ten to 15 years ago it was widely accepted that student loans were a good form of debt,” said James Kvaal, under secretary of education during the Biden administration. “A lot has changed.”

Expanding access—and debt​

The unpaid federal student-loan balance has swelled to $1.66 trillion, from $516 billion nearly two decades ago. For millions, the loans helped them earn degrees that lifted their earnings potential, making the debt burden more than worth it. But paying it down has strained borrowers of all ages.

That wasn’t what policymakers had in mind 60 years ago when President Johnson signed legislation that opened access to loans, allowing students to sign up for a degree without worrying about whether they could afford it. The rising cost of higher education and the broadening of loan access shifted the scales.

Betancur, whose parents immigrated to the U.S. from South America when he was a toddler, was the first in his family to attend college. He got a full scholarship to study English literature at the College of New Jersey. Later, when he was deciding whether to go to graduate school, a tour guide at Life Chiropractic College West in California encouraged him to take out loans to finance his degree.

“I was excited,” Betancur said. “I was looking at the education and what I was going to do with it, and I wasn’t really thinking about the money.”

That money was especially free-flowing when he was a student. Federal loans went from being a tool for lower-income families to a standard way many people paid for higher education.


A 1981 law had extended the loans to independent undergraduate, graduate and professional students. Two other key changes came in the 1990s: The government introduced direct lending to students, signaling a shift from federally backed loans from private banks. Unsubsidized loans were also added to the mix. While available to everyone regardless of income, the loans put borrowers on the hook for interest accrued while they were in school, as opposed to subsidized loans, where the government covers the interest while they’re enrolled.

Since Betancur’s parents weren’t helping him pay and he was pursuing graduate school, he was eligible for higher borrowing limits. Betancur took the maximum allowable and added private loans to cover the rest. He wasn’t alone.

Between 1990 and 2000, when many Gen Xers were in college, student debt more than doubled, according to the American Council on Education. It also took on a longer life.

When Betancur opened his chiropractic practice in the early 2000s, a loan servicer advised him to put his federal student loans into a payment pause to get his business off the ground, he said. Betancur focused instead on his private loans, which took about 10 years to pay off.

He spent 15 years in and out of forbearance, deferment and repayment on his federal loans. In the years when his business did well, he would make payments toward the debt. When money was tight, he was advised to pause or defer those payments. All the while interest was accruing on his seemingly unchanged balance.

His loans were held by Navient, one of the country’s largest student-loan servicers. Last year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau banned Navient from servicing federal student loans, saying it misled borrowers, processed their payments incorrectly and steered those who may have qualified for income-driven repayment plans into forbearance instead. The company agreed to pay a $120 million fine, but said it didn’t agree with the CFPB’s findings.

Betancur’s federal student-loan payments were always part of an income-driven repayment plan. Though he paid the recommended amount, it was never enough to beat the interest. He resigned himself to the idea that he’d be paying off his student loans for the rest of his life.

From promising to past due​

In 2006, the federal government once again expanded borrowing, allowing graduate and professional students to take out loans up to the total cost of attendance, including tuition, room and board and books.

It coincided with a rise in nontraditional students seeking degrees. That included people older than 24, those employed full-time outside of school and parents like Christopher Fausone.

Fausone got his bachelor’s degree in applied behavior analysis when he was in his 30s to help him as he home-schooled his son, who has autism. Nearly a decade later, he received an M.B.A., hoping it would advance his career.

But the higher-paying roles he dreamed of slipped through his grasp because they required years of work experience, he said.

Today, the 49-year-old lives in Marysville, Wash., and works in commercial pest control. He makes $80,000 a year, and owes around $130,000 in student loans.

Like many borrowers, he hasn’t been paying his loans since the pandemic pause. He focused instead on paying off his car and other debt.

When the pause ended last year and he failed to resume payments, his credit score dropped more than 200 points. Fausone was surprised when he received a notification saying he’d fallen six months behind. He put his loans in a 3-month forbearance.

About five million of the 44.7 million student-loan borrowers are more than 90 days past due, according to Federal Student Aid data. Borrowers who are 50 and older are more likely than other age groups to be seriously delinquent on their loans, according to the New York Fed.

Fausone says he regrets going to graduate school and taking out student loans. He has nothing saved for retirement and doesn’t think he will be able to afford to buy a house. He was hoping to refinance his car to get a lower interest rate, but after his credit score dropped, he believes he wouldn’t qualify.

Now out of forbearance, he worries he won’t be able to keep up with his monthly loan payments and may have some of his paycheck withheld by the government. Loan holders can instruct employers to hold up to 15% of a defaulted borrower’s paycheck.

“I’m going to be working until the day I die,” Fausone said.

Spiraling debt​

Now decades into their adult lives, many Gen Xers have accumulated other types of debt, often causing student-loan payments to fall down the priority list after credit cards and auto and personal loans. The middle-age crunch of caring for both children and parents has added to the load.

Gen X had a median nonmortgage debt of $26,207 as of this year, higher than all other generations, according to a LendingTree analysis of people in the largest 100 metro areas. They also held the highest average credit-card debt last year, at $9,557, according to Experian.



This is what happens when the govt gets involved in the student loan business. If the govt was a person it would have to wear a hockey helmet
 
We need to stop blaming everything under the sun - including student loans when the real problem is inflation and how human capital has been stolen for a century now.

We have become chattel because we don't know how long we will live AND the cost of core living expenses now rises - it used to fall axiomatically due to human innovation (human capital)
I thought I had insurmountable student loan debt soon after graduation.
Eventually inflation made it look like a pittance.
 
We hear about student loan debt all the time when it comes to Millennials and Gen Z, but rarely in reference to Gen X. I’m Gen X, and I can’t recall a single conversation with people my age that revolved around student debt.



Student-Loan Debt Is Strangling Gen X

Free-flowing student loans promised upward mobility. Instead, they left the ‘forgotten generation’ with a mountain of debt and regret; ‘I’m going to be working until the day I die.’


One of the most enduring relationships of Rick Betancur’s adult life is with his student debt.

The federal loans have followed him for more than 26 years, longer than he’s been married. While his family has doubled with the addition of two children, his $74,000 in graduate school debt has more than quadrupled to $300,000.

When the 55-year-old New Jersey chiropractor looks at his current balance, he is stupefied. He’s made enough payments toward the loan throughout the years to cover the initial amount he borrowed, but it’s been buried in decades of mounting interest.

His balance continues to accrue interest—and repercussions, most recently the denial of a home-equity loan application. Decades of payments meant Betancur wasn’t able to save for retirement until later in life. Today he has a little over $200,000 saved, a fraction of the seven times one’s salary Fidelity Investments recommends workers have by 55.

Gen X is barreling toward retirement with an excruciating student-loan burden. The six million-plus borrowers aged 50 to 61 have the highest average balance of any age group, at $47,857, according to Federal Student Aid data. Now, as parents and grandparents, they are passing along a skepticism toward higher education and its hefty price tag, part of the broader unraveling of America’s “college for all” ideology.

Student loan debt per borrower, by age group​


The oldest Gen Xers were born in 1965, the same year the Higher Education Act created the modern student-loan system. The baby boomers older than them didn’t have the same access, and the millennials younger than them had greater awareness of the long shadow debt can cast. But for a brief window when the “forgotten generation” was reaching college age, student loans conveyed all of the promise of American upward mobility with none of the pitfalls.

“Back then college was a must,” said Betancur. “You were either going to college or sweeping floors.”

Decades later, the promise is an albatross for many, thanks in part to years of student-loan policy changes, conflicting information from servicers and system backlogs. And it’s becoming more burdensome as the instability of America’s student-loan apparatus comes into sharp focus.

The Education Department under President Trump has threatened to confiscate wages from millions of borrowers if they haven’t made payments since the pandemic, when the Biden administration extended the pause on student-debt repayment. A new tax-and-spending law, signed in July, restricts some borrowing and repayment plans, marking a retreat from federal student lending.

“Repaying federal student loans is not a political football—it’s the law,” an Education Department spokesperson said. “The Trump Administration is providing borrowers with clarity and consistency.” Citing record-high loan defaults and delinquencies, the department in early September announced a new initiative to educate borrowers about the benefits and risks of federal student-loan borrowing.

It has been a particularly jarring shift from the Biden era, when monthly loan payments for low-income borrowers were reduced and a sweeping student-loan forgiveness plan briefly raised hopes for a reprieve before it was blocked.

“Ten to 15 years ago it was widely accepted that student loans were a good form of debt,” said James Kvaal, under secretary of education during the Biden administration. “A lot has changed.”

Expanding access—and debt​

The unpaid federal student-loan balance has swelled to $1.66 trillion, from $516 billion nearly two decades ago. For millions, the loans helped them earn degrees that lifted their earnings potential, making the debt burden more than worth it. But paying it down has strained borrowers of all ages.

That wasn’t what policymakers had in mind 60 years ago when President Johnson signed legislation that opened access to loans, allowing students to sign up for a degree without worrying about whether they could afford it. The rising cost of higher education and the broadening of loan access shifted the scales.

Betancur, whose parents immigrated to the U.S. from South America when he was a toddler, was the first in his family to attend college. He got a full scholarship to study English literature at the College of New Jersey. Later, when he was deciding whether to go to graduate school, a tour guide at Life Chiropractic College West in California encouraged him to take out loans to finance his degree.

“I was excited,” Betancur said. “I was looking at the education and what I was going to do with it, and I wasn’t really thinking about the money.”

That money was especially free-flowing when he was a student. Federal loans went from being a tool for lower-income families to a standard way many people paid for higher education.


A 1981 law had extended the loans to independent undergraduate, graduate and professional students. Two other key changes came in the 1990s: The government introduced direct lending to students, signaling a shift from federally backed loans from private banks. Unsubsidized loans were also added to the mix. While available to everyone regardless of income, the loans put borrowers on the hook for interest accrued while they were in school, as opposed to subsidized loans, where the government covers the interest while they’re enrolled.

Since Betancur’s parents weren’t helping him pay and he was pursuing graduate school, he was eligible for higher borrowing limits. Betancur took the maximum allowable and added private loans to cover the rest. He wasn’t alone.

Between 1990 and 2000, when many Gen Xers were in college, student debt more than doubled, according to the American Council on Education. It also took on a longer life.

When Betancur opened his chiropractic practice in the early 2000s, a loan servicer advised him to put his federal student loans into a payment pause to get his business off the ground, he said. Betancur focused instead on his private loans, which took about 10 years to pay off.

He spent 15 years in and out of forbearance, deferment and repayment on his federal loans. In the years when his business did well, he would make payments toward the debt. When money was tight, he was advised to pause or defer those payments. All the while interest was accruing on his seemingly unchanged balance.

His loans were held by Navient, one of the country’s largest student-loan servicers. Last year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau banned Navient from servicing federal student loans, saying it misled borrowers, processed their payments incorrectly and steered those who may have qualified for income-driven repayment plans into forbearance instead. The company agreed to pay a $120 million fine, but said it didn’t agree with the CFPB’s findings.

Betancur’s federal student-loan payments were always part of an income-driven repayment plan. Though he paid the recommended amount, it was never enough to beat the interest. He resigned himself to the idea that he’d be paying off his student loans for the rest of his life.

From promising to past due​

In 2006, the federal government once again expanded borrowing, allowing graduate and professional students to take out loans up to the total cost of attendance, including tuition, room and board and books.

It coincided with a rise in nontraditional students seeking degrees. That included people older than 24, those employed full-time outside of school and parents like Christopher Fausone.

Fausone got his bachelor’s degree in applied behavior analysis when he was in his 30s to help him as he home-schooled his son, who has autism. Nearly a decade later, he received an M.B.A., hoping it would advance his career.

But the higher-paying roles he dreamed of slipped through his grasp because they required years of work experience, he said.

Today, the 49-year-old lives in Marysville, Wash., and works in commercial pest control. He makes $80,000 a year, and owes around $130,000 in student loans.

Like many borrowers, he hasn’t been paying his loans since the pandemic pause. He focused instead on paying off his car and other debt.

When the pause ended last year and he failed to resume payments, his credit score dropped more than 200 points. Fausone was surprised when he received a notification saying he’d fallen six months behind. He put his loans in a 3-month forbearance.

About five million of the 44.7 million student-loan borrowers are more than 90 days past due, according to Federal Student Aid data. Borrowers who are 50 and older are more likely than other age groups to be seriously delinquent on their loans, according to the New York Fed.

Fausone says he regrets going to graduate school and taking out student loans. He has nothing saved for retirement and doesn’t think he will be able to afford to buy a house. He was hoping to refinance his car to get a lower interest rate, but after his credit score dropped, he believes he wouldn’t qualify.

Now out of forbearance, he worries he won’t be able to keep up with his monthly loan payments and may have some of his paycheck withheld by the government. Loan holders can instruct employers to hold up to 15% of a defaulted borrower’s paycheck.

“I’m going to be working until the day I die,” Fausone said.

Spiraling debt​

Now decades into their adult lives, many Gen Xers have accumulated other types of debt, often causing student-loan payments to fall down the priority list after credit cards and auto and personal loans. The middle-age crunch of caring for both children and parents has added to the load.

Gen X had a median nonmortgage debt of $26,207 as of this year, higher than all other generations, according to a LendingTree analysis of people in the largest 100 metro areas. They also held the highest average credit-card debt last year, at $9,557, according to Experian.



One thing I never understood is how one got themselves into such debt. Do they miss something when they agreed to the loans? Didn’t read the find print? When one purchases a house they understand the financial obligations, so how could this guy let a $74, 000 debt balloon into $300,000? Guess I’m missing something
 
When I went to school, I could get a part-time job and cover most or all of the costs. College was not that expensive. Inflation does not explain it. After graduating, I took night school classes just to learn. It was not a financial burden.
 
One thing I never understood is how one got themselves into such debt. Do they miss something when they agreed to the loans? Didn’t read the find print? When one purchases a house they understand the financial obligations, so how could this guy let a $74, 000 debt balloon into $300,000? Guess I’m missing something

I think a lot of students have higher career aspirations than what they end up achieving. They see a big amount, but think they'll make a lot of money & it won't be a problem. The idealism of youth.

I'm not sure how I feel about the idea of free education - but college costs are so out of control now. Even public universities. I remember when I went, it was pretty Spartan. No frills dorm rooms, the food was bad, etc. Now, it seems like colleges have to make it like a country club to attract applicants, and they have sushi and sirloin at the dining halls, workout areas like the finest hotels have, the best of everything.

To me, this story is more about how college costs have outpaced incomes more than anything.
 
One thing I never understood is how one got themselves into such debt. Do they miss something when they agreed to the loans? Didn’t read the find print? When one purchases a house they understand the financial obligations, so how could this guy let a $74, 000 debt balloon into $300,000? Guess I’m missing something
Without going into the weeds, I don’t think it’s the same as a mortgage where the payments are straightforward. My understanding is the rules are more complex, and loan servicers don’t always make it clear when your payments aren’t enough. So even though you keep paying, the interest can keep increasing.
 
When I went to school, I could get a part-time job and cover most or all of the costs. College was not that expensive. Inflation does not explain it. After graduating, I took night school classes just to learn. It was not a financial burden.
Yeah, it was a different time. A smaller percentage of the population went to college, and there weren’t nearly as many international students as there are today. On top of that, tuition and fees have grown much faster than both inflation and income.
 
I think a lot of students have higher career aspirations than what they end up achieving. They see a big amount, but think they'll make a lot of money & it won't be a problem. The idealism of youth.

I'm not sure how I feel about the idea of free education - but college costs are so out of control now. Even public universities. I remember when I went, it was pretty Spartan. No frills dorm rooms, the food was bad, etc. Now, it seems like colleges have to make it like a country club to attract applicants, and they have sushi and sirloin at the dining halls, workout areas like the finest hotels have, the best of everything.

To me, this story is more about how college costs have outpaced incomes more than anything.
I think you summed it up well. College costs have gone way beyond what incomes can support, and that comes from a mix of things. I agree with you on the country club part, since schools spend a fortune on amenities and build it into tuition. Bureaucracies have grown too, because of federal mandates and because schools keep hiring more administrators. It's no wonder debt has become such a problem.

Free college sounds good in theory, but it is not sustainable while schools keep raising tuition, adding these expensive amenities, and expanding their bureaucracies. Making college free just shifts the bill to taxpayers without fixing the cost problem.
 
We hear about student loan debt all the time when it comes to Millennials and Gen Z, but rarely in reference to Gen X. I’m Gen X, and I can’t recall a single conversation with people my age that revolved around student debt.



Student-Loan Debt Is Strangling Gen X

Free-flowing student loans promised upward mobility. Instead, they left the ‘forgotten generation’ with a mountain of debt and regret; ‘I’m going to be working until the day I die.’

And you believed them and voluntarily took on that debt. Now you want to welch on it.

TANTSAAFL.
 
I think you summed it up well. College costs have gone way beyond what incomes can support, and that comes from a mix of things. I agree with you on the country club part, since schools spend a fortune on amenities and build it into tuition. Bureaucracies have grown too, because of federal mandates and because schools keep hiring more administrators. It's no wonder debt has become such a problem.

Free college sounds good in theory, but it is not sustainable while schools keep raising tuition, adding these expensive amenities, and expanding their bureaucracies. Making college free just shifts the bill to taxpayers without fixing the cost problem.
Welcher.

Instead of taking on a debt you can't afford and wasting your time in college, you could've learned a good trade and be making excellent money right now.
 
I think you summed it up well. College costs have gone way beyond what incomes can support, and that comes from a mix of things. I agree with you on the country club part, since schools spend a fortune on amenities and build it into tuition. Bureaucracies have grown too, because of federal mandates and because schools keep hiring more administrators. It's no wonder debt has become such a problem.

Free college sounds good in theory, but it is not sustainable while schools keep raising tuition, adding these expensive amenities, and expanding their bureaucracies. Making college free just shifts the bill to taxpayers without fixing the cost problem.
I paid for my own college. I didn't take on any debt. Why should I pay for your's welcher?
 
When I went to school, I could get a part-time job and cover most or all of the costs. College was not that expensive. Inflation does not explain it. After graduating, I took night school classes just to learn. It was not a financial burden.
When the govt got involved in the student loan business that when things got crazy Poindexter
 
We hear about student loan debt all the time when it comes to Millennials and Gen Z, but rarely in reference to Gen X. I’m Gen X, and I can’t recall a single conversation with people my age that revolved around student debt.



“Back then college was a must,” said Betancur. “You were either going to college or sweeping floors.”

Decades later, the promise is an albatross for many, thanks in part to years of student-loan policy changes, conflicting information from servicers and system backlogs. And it’s becoming more burdensome as the instability of America’s student-loan apparatus comes into sharp focus.

The Education Department under President Trump has threatened to confiscate wages from millions of borrowers if they haven’t made payments since the pandemic, when the Biden administration extended the pause on student-debt repayment. A new tax-and-spending law, signed in July, restricts some borrowing and repayment plans, marking a retreat from federal student lending.

“Repaying federal student loans is not a political football—it’s the law,” an Education Department spokesperson said. “The Trump Administration is providing borrowers with clarity and consistency.” Citing record-high loan defaults and delinquencies, the department in early September announced a new initiative to educate borrowers about the benefits and risks of federal student-loan borrowing.

It has been a particularly jarring shift from the Biden era, when monthly loan payments for low-income borrowers were reduced and a sweeping student-loan forgiveness plan briefly raised hopes for a reprieve before it was blocked.

“Ten to 15 years ago it was widely accepted that student loans were a good form of debt,” said James Kvaal, under secretary of education during the Biden administration. “A lot has changed.”

Expanding access—and debt​

The unpaid federal student-loan balance has swelled to $1.66 trillion, from $516 billion nearly two decades ago. For millions, the loans helped them earn degrees that lifted their earnings potential, making the debt burden more than worth it. But paying it down has strained borrowers of all ages.

That wasn’t what policymakers had in mind 60 years ago when President Johnson signed legislation that opened access to loans, allowing students to sign up for a degree without worrying about whether they could afford it. The rising cost of higher education and the broadening of loan access shifted the scales.

Betancur, whose parents immigrated to the U.S. from South America when he was a toddler, was the first in his family to attend college. He got a full scholarship to study English literature at the College of New Jersey. Later, when he was deciding whether to go to graduate school, a tour guide at Life Chiropractic College West in California encouraged him to take out loans to finance his degree.

“I was excited,” Betancur said. “I was looking at the education and what I was going to do with it, and I wasn’t really thinking about the money.”

That money was especially free-flowing when he was a student. Federal loans went from being a tool for lower-income families to a standard way many people paid for higher education.


A 1981 law had extended the loans to independent undergraduate, graduate and professional students. Two other key changes came in the 1990s: The government introduced direct lending to students, signaling a shift from federally backed loans from private banks. Unsubsidized loans were also added to the mix. While available to everyone regardless of income, the loans put borrowers on the hook for interest accrued while they were in school, as opposed to subsidized loans, where the government covers the interest while they’re enrolled.

Since Betancur’s parents weren’t helping him pay and he was pursuing graduate school, he was eligible for higher borrowing limits. Betancur took the maximum allowable and added private loans to cover the rest. He wasn’t alone.

Between 1990 and 2000, when many Gen Xers were in college, student debt more than doubled, according to the American Council on Education. It also took on a longer life.

When Betancur opened his chiropractic practice in the early 2000s, a loan servicer advised him to put his federal student loans into a payment pause to get his business off the ground, he said. Betancur focused instead on his private loans, which took about 10 years to pay off.

He spent 15 years in and out of forbearance, deferment and repayment on his federal loans. In the years when his business did well, he would make payments toward the debt. When money was tight, he was advised to pause or defer those payments. All the while interest was accruing on his seemingly unchanged balance.

His loans were held by Navient, one of the country’s largest student-loan servicers. Last year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau banned Navient from servicing federal student loans, saying it misled borrowers, processed their payments incorrectly and steered those who may have qualified for income-driven repayment plans into forbearance instead. The company agreed to pay a $120 million fine, but said it didn’t agree with the CFPB’s findings.

Betancur’s federal student-loan payments were always part of an income-driven repayment plan. Though he paid the recommended amount, it was never enough to beat the interest. He resigned himself to the idea that he’d be paying off his student loans for the rest of his life.

From promising to past due​

In 2006, the federal government once again expanded borrowing, allowing graduate and professional students to take out loans up to the total cost of attendance, including tuition, room and board and books.

It coincided with a rise in nontraditional students seeking degrees. That included people older than 24, those employed full-time outside of school and parents like Christopher Fausone.

Fausone got his bachelor’s degree in applied behavior analysis when he was in his 30s to help him as he home-schooled his son, who has autism. Nearly a decade later, he received an M.B.A., hoping it would advance his career.

But the higher-paying roles he dreamed of slipped through his grasp because they required years of work experience, he said.

Today, the 49-year-old lives in Marysville, Wash., and works in commercial pest control. He makes $80,000 a year, and owes around $130,000 in student loans.

Like many borrowers, he hasn’t been paying his loans since the pandemic pause. He focused instead on paying off his car and other debt.

When the pause ended last year and he failed to resume payments, his credit score dropped more than 200 points. Fausone was surprised when he received a notification saying he’d fallen six months behind. He put his loans in a 3-month forbearance.

About five million of the 44.7 million student-loan borrowers are more than 90 days past due, according to Federal Student Aid data. Borrowers who are 50 and older are more likely than other age groups to be seriously delinquent on their loans, according to the New York Fed.

Fausone says he regrets going to graduate school and taking out student loans. He has nothing saved for retirement and doesn’t think he will be able to afford to buy a house. He was hoping to refinance his car to get a lower interest rate, but after his credit score dropped, he believes he wouldn’t qualify.

Now out of forbearance, he worries he won’t be able to keep up with his monthly loan payments and may have some of his paycheck withheld by the government. Loan holders can instruct employers to hold up to 15% of a defaulted borrower’s paycheck.

“I’m going to be working until the day I die,” Fausone said.

Spiraling debt​

Now decades into their adult lives, many Gen Xers have accumulated other types of debt, often causing student-loan payments to fall down the priority list after credit cards and auto and personal loans. The middle-age crunch of caring for both children and parents has added to the load.

Gen X had a median nonmortgage debt of $26,207 as of this year, higher than all other generations, according to a LendingTree analysis of people in the largest 100 metro areas. They also held the highest average credit-card debt last year, at $9,557, according to Experian.



Tuition has skyrocketed because the schools know student loan money is there to tap into.

Personally I think the government needs to make a QUALITY free online four year University. Students could attend for free as long as they maintained a 3.0 average. That way if you are smart and live in a remote town you have access to an upper education. I'd also require that schools that took federal funds would be required to accept the first two years for students that want to transfer. It could basically cut the cost of a college degree to almost zero or cut it in half if you transfer to another university after your first 2 years of online work.
 
We hear about student loan debt all the time when it comes to Millennials and Gen Z, but rarely in reference to Gen X. I’m Gen X, and I can’t recall a single conversation with people my age that revolved around student debt.



Student-Loan Debt Is Strangling Gen X

Free-flowing student loans promised upward mobility. Instead, they left the ‘forgotten generation’ with a mountain of debt and regret; ‘I’m going to be working until the day I die.’


One of the most enduring relationships of Rick Betancur’s adult life is with his student debt.

The federal loans have followed him for more than 26 years, longer than he’s been married. While his family has doubled with the addition of two children, his $74,000 in graduate school debt has more than quadrupled to $300,000.

When the 55-year-old New Jersey chiropractor looks at his current balance, he is stupefied. He’s made enough payments toward the loan throughout the years to cover the initial amount he borrowed, but it’s been buried in decades of mounting interest.

His balance continues to accrue interest—and repercussions, most recently the denial of a home-equity loan application. Decades of payments meant Betancur wasn’t able to save for retirement until later in life. Today he has a little over $200,000 saved, a fraction of the seven times one’s salary Fidelity Investments recommends workers have by 55.

Gen X is barreling toward retirement with an excruciating student-loan burden. The six million-plus borrowers aged 50 to 61 have the highest average balance of any age group, at $47,857, according to Federal Student Aid data. Now, as parents and grandparents, they are passing along a skepticism toward higher education and its hefty price tag, part of the broader unraveling of America’s “college for all” ideology.

Student loan debt per borrower, by age group​


The oldest Gen Xers were born in 1965, the same year the Higher Education Act created the modern student-loan system. The baby boomers older than them didn’t have the same access, and the millennials younger than them had greater awareness of the long shadow debt can cast. But for a brief window when the “forgotten generation” was reaching college age, student loans conveyed all of the promise of American upward mobility with none of the pitfalls.

“Back then college was a must,” said Betancur. “You were either going to college or sweeping floors.”

Decades later, the promise is an albatross for many, thanks in part to years of student-loan policy changes, conflicting information from servicers and system backlogs. And it’s becoming more burdensome as the instability of America’s student-loan apparatus comes into sharp focus.

The Education Department under President Trump has threatened to confiscate wages from millions of borrowers if they haven’t made payments since the pandemic, when the Biden administration extended the pause on student-debt repayment. A new tax-and-spending law, signed in July, restricts some borrowing and repayment plans, marking a retreat from federal student lending.

“Repaying federal student loans is not a political football—it’s the law,” an Education Department spokesperson said. “The Trump Administration is providing borrowers with clarity and consistency.” Citing record-high loan defaults and delinquencies, the department in early September announced a new initiative to educate borrowers about the benefits and risks of federal student-loan borrowing.

It has been a particularly jarring shift from the Biden era, when monthly loan payments for low-income borrowers were reduced and a sweeping student-loan forgiveness plan briefly raised hopes for a reprieve before it was blocked.

“Ten to 15 years ago it was widely accepted that student loans were a good form of debt,” said James Kvaal, under secretary of education during the Biden administration. “A lot has changed.”

Expanding access—and debt​

The unpaid federal student-loan balance has swelled to $1.66 trillion, from $516 billion nearly two decades ago. For millions, the loans helped them earn degrees that lifted their earnings potential, making the debt burden more than worth it. But paying it down has strained borrowers of all ages.

That wasn’t what policymakers had in mind 60 years ago when President Johnson signed legislation that opened access to loans, allowing students to sign up for a degree without worrying about whether they could afford it. The rising cost of higher education and the broadening of loan access shifted the scales.

Betancur, whose parents immigrated to the U.S. from South America when he was a toddler, was the first in his family to attend college. He got a full scholarship to study English literature at the College of New Jersey. Later, when he was deciding whether to go to graduate school, a tour guide at Life Chiropractic College West in California encouraged him to take out loans to finance his degree.

“I was excited,” Betancur said. “I was looking at the education and what I was going to do with it, and I wasn’t really thinking about the money.”

That money was especially free-flowing when he was a student. Federal loans went from being a tool for lower-income families to a standard way many people paid for higher education.


A 1981 law had extended the loans to independent undergraduate, graduate and professional students. Two other key changes came in the 1990s: The government introduced direct lending to students, signaling a shift from federally backed loans from private banks. Unsubsidized loans were also added to the mix. While available to everyone regardless of income, the loans put borrowers on the hook for interest accrued while they were in school, as opposed to subsidized loans, where the government covers the interest while they’re enrolled.

Since Betancur’s parents weren’t helping him pay and he was pursuing graduate school, he was eligible for higher borrowing limits. Betancur took the maximum allowable and added private loans to cover the rest. He wasn’t alone.

Between 1990 and 2000, when many Gen Xers were in college, student debt more than doubled, according to the American Council on Education. It also took on a longer life.

When Betancur opened his chiropractic practice in the early 2000s, a loan servicer advised him to put his federal student loans into a payment pause to get his business off the ground, he said. Betancur focused instead on his private loans, which took about 10 years to pay off.

He spent 15 years in and out of forbearance, deferment and repayment on his federal loans. In the years when his business did well, he would make payments toward the debt. When money was tight, he was advised to pause or defer those payments. All the while interest was accruing on his seemingly unchanged balance.

His loans were held by Navient, one of the country’s largest student-loan servicers. Last year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau banned Navient from servicing federal student loans, saying it misled borrowers, processed their payments incorrectly and steered those who may have qualified for income-driven repayment plans into forbearance instead. The company agreed to pay a $120 million fine, but said it didn’t agree with the CFPB’s findings.

Betancur’s federal student-loan payments were always part of an income-driven repayment plan. Though he paid the recommended amount, it was never enough to beat the interest. He resigned himself to the idea that he’d be paying off his student loans for the rest of his life.

From promising to past due​

In 2006, the federal government once again expanded borrowing, allowing graduate and professional students to take out loans up to the total cost of attendance, including tuition, room and board and books.

It coincided with a rise in nontraditional students seeking degrees. That included people older than 24, those employed full-time outside of school and parents like Christopher Fausone.

Fausone got his bachelor’s degree in applied behavior analysis when he was in his 30s to help him as he home-schooled his son, who has autism. Nearly a decade later, he received an M.B.A., hoping it would advance his career.

But the higher-paying roles he dreamed of slipped through his grasp because they required years of work experience, he said.

Today, the 49-year-old lives in Marysville, Wash., and works in commercial pest control. He makes $80,000 a year, and owes around $130,000 in student loans.

Like many borrowers, he hasn’t been paying his loans since the pandemic pause. He focused instead on paying off his car and other debt.

When the pause ended last year and he failed to resume payments, his credit score dropped more than 200 points. Fausone was surprised when he received a notification saying he’d fallen six months behind. He put his loans in a 3-month forbearance.

About five million of the 44.7 million student-loan borrowers are more than 90 days past due, according to Federal Student Aid data. Borrowers who are 50 and older are more likely than other age groups to be seriously delinquent on their loans, according to the New York Fed.

Fausone says he regrets going to graduate school and taking out student loans. He has nothing saved for retirement and doesn’t think he will be able to afford to buy a house. He was hoping to refinance his car to get a lower interest rate, but after his credit score dropped, he believes he wouldn’t qualify.

Now out of forbearance, he worries he won’t be able to keep up with his monthly loan payments and may have some of his paycheck withheld by the government. Loan holders can instruct employers to hold up to 15% of a defaulted borrower’s paycheck.

“I’m going to be working until the day I die,” Fausone said.

Spiraling debt​

Now decades into their adult lives, many Gen Xers have accumulated other types of debt, often causing student-loan payments to fall down the priority list after credit cards and auto and personal loans. The middle-age crunch of caring for both children and parents has added to the load.

Gen X had a median nonmortgage debt of $26,207 as of this year, higher than all other generations, according to a LendingTree analysis of people in the largest 100 metro areas. They also held the highest average credit-card debt last year, at $9,557, according to Experian.



Seriously? I thought we were doing better than that. I'm Gen X and mine are paid off. Have been for decades.
 
Back
Top