Musk has 58 times as much money.Soros is one of the billionaires who tells DC what to do.
Musk has 58 times as much money.Soros is one of the billionaires who tells DC what to do.
Nostradamus fallacy. I still believe that a flock of birds will be spotted flying south over a body of water, with a storm brewing in the east.I still believe there will be a crash, followed by a rise with double digit inflation.
Musk has 58 times the bubble as Soros.Musk has 58 times as much money.
My predictions are specific. They might be right, or they might be wrong. When investing, we make predictions about the future.Nostradamus fallacy. I still believe that a flock of birds will be spotted flying south over a body of water, with a storm brewing in the east.
Your "prophecy" is totally vague. You have a lot of doom and gloom to define. Let's look.My predictions are specific.
If my "prophecy" comes true, it is specific enough to make me a lot of money.Your "prophecy" is totally vague.
I would predict a 20+% drop in the overall market. Probably closer to 40%, if the inflation does not start hitting before the crash.What constitutes a "crash"?
With double digit inflation, we would expect at least a 10% rise in the market... But I would guess much higher. The market is a good place to hide from inflation, and there will be a lot of money needing hiding.What constitutes a "rise"?
And that is the question. When will the retail investors run out of money to prop up the markets? I am guessing one to two years. A lot of other people I trust are saying the same thing.On what respective dates will the crash and rise happen
In 1929, the stock market tripled... Before dropping by 90%. Testing new highs in an unstable market is often comes right before the crash.That seems like a rather odd conclusion from the current state of the markets.
Will you agree the US was bankrupt in 1929 and needed a world war to destroy the global economy? Funny that the US is bankrupt once again almost 100 years to the date.In 1929, the stock market tripled... Before dropping by 90%. Testing new highs in an unstable market is often comes right before the crash.
No. The government had few large debts, and was able to service them easily. That is not bankruptcy.Will you agree the US was bankrupt in 1929
No, we did not need a world war.and needed a world war to destroy the global economy?
We have a lot more debt now, so you would think we are in bankruptcy now, but not then. That being said, back then we needed to pay back the debt in gold, which is limited. Now we need to pay back the debt in Dollars, which the US Government creates from nothing.Funny that the US is bankrupt once again almost 100 years to the date.
You're pulling shit out of both sides of your ass. The US is bankrupt and needs a nuclear WW3.No. The government had few large debts, and was able to service them easily. That is not bankruptcy.
No, we did not need a world war.
We have a lot more debt now, so you would think we are in bankruptcy now, but not then. That being said, back then we needed to pay back the debt in gold, which is limited. Now we need to pay back the debt in Dollars, which the US Government creates from nothing.
In neither case were we even close to bankruptcy.
A nuclear WWIII would be devastating to the economy. It would kill a large part of the American people, and thus the American economy. The people left would be in teams which were missing most of the team, so would be ineffective. It would be worse than the Fall of the Western Roman Empire, the Mongol Invasion of the West, and the Bronze Age Collapse combined. I cannot think of a worse economic disaster.You're pulling shit out of both sides of your ass. The US is bankrupt and needs a nuclear WW3.
The west went from slavery to feudalism and then capitalism which led to globalism. Nothing stays the same with the exception of money being funneled from the working class up to the ruling class. I want to believe this is about to change.A nuclear WWIII would be devastating to the economy. It would kill a large part of the American people, and thus the American economy. The people left would be in teams which were missing most of the team, so would be ineffective. It would be worse than the Fall of the Western Roman Empire, the Mongol Invasion of the West, and the Bronze Age Collapse combined. I cannot think of a worse economic disaster.
During the first half of feudalism, most peasants never saw a single piece of money in their lives. Obviously, most (but not all) slaves never had any access to money.Nothing stays the same with the exception of money being funneled from the working class up to the ruling class.
I am laughing at you, Wally. The S&P is currently at 6587 and has been climbing since you made this post.I predict that the S&P 500 will be well under 5,000 by September 30th, and I put my money where my mouth is. I have bought a bunch of SPY puts centering around a strike price of $500, all expiring on September 30th. If the S&P goes down to around 4,000, I will make quite a bit of money.
If the S&P 500 stays above 5,000, then you can laugh at me![]()
I can.A nuclear WWIII would be devastating to the economy. It would kill a large part of the American people, and thus the American economy. The people left would be in teams which were missing most of the team, so would be ineffective. It would be worse than the Fall of the Western Roman Empire, the Mongol Invasion of the West, and the Bronze Age Collapse combined. I cannot think of a worse economic disaster.
Wally, people don't ask for your financial advice for obvious reasons.I do not have any insider information, but no one needs insider information to trade options. I am not considered an insider, but I do have my trades more monitored because of my job... But again, no insider information.
I am not quite sure how someone would get insider information on the 500 or so companies in the S&P 500.
It did sink down once, and I could have walked away with a profit, but I thought there would be a bigger profit.I am laughing at you, Wally. The S&P is currently at 6587 and has been climbing since you made this post.
I cannot think of a worse economic disaster, so you respond with something you think we will chose that will be a worse economic disaster? Why would we do it if it would be a worse economic disaster than losing most of America's population?The worldwide rejection of fiat currency.