Florida plans to become first state to eliminate all childhood vaccine mandates

Neurodivergence has been around as long as humanity. I doubt if we will ever come up with a single cause. My now-five-yo g-son is on the spectrum. Twenty years ago he would not have been diagnosed, but just thought to be "sensitive," as I was told I was as a kid too. He is super intelligent, curious, loving, with a strong sense of self and great ability to bond with others.
Mine is about the same, can yours tell you what day of the week any date is, mine does,
 
Mine is about the same, can yours tell you what day of the week any date is, mine does,

That's cool! No, he doesn't do that but like his mom when she was little, he can tell you the names of countries on a globe or map without being able (yet) to read their names. When he was three, he was very angry that he couldn't watch his favorite cartoon because mom and dad had canceled the service (I think it was Netflix) that showed it. So when they were busy elsewhere, he climbed up on the bookcase, got the remote, ordered the service, and charged it to his dad's account. They found him happily perched on the couch with a bag of chips (which they also thought that they'd secured out of reach), watching his favorite show. lol

He just started preschool last week. He already knows the letters (and sounds they make) and numbers and several sight words. They are going to keep an eye out for boredom and give him interesting things to do if it occurs since he's ahead of his peers already.
 
That's cool! No, he doesn't do that but like his mom when she was little, he can tell you the names of countries on a globe or map without being able (yet) to read their names. When he was three, he was very angry that he couldn't watch his favorite cartoon because mom and dad had canceled the service (I think it was Netflix) that showed it. So when they were busy elsewhere, he climbed up on the bookcase, got the remote, ordered the service, and charged it to his dad's account. They found him happily perched on the couch with a bag of chips (which they also thought that they'd secured out of reach), watching his favorite show. lol

He just started preschool last week. He already knows the letters (and sounds they make) and numbers and several sight words. They are going to keep an eye out for boredom and give him interesting things to do if it occurs since he's ahead of his peers already.
I tell ya these kids are amazing at what they can do some times.
 
Sorry, Scott, I'm not wasting my time reading nutso flack.
You're too busy writing it.

I'm a college-educated licensed health care professional.
You're an undereducated intellectual coward who, by your own emphatic advocacy for death, is probably a healthcare serial murderer. Your infatuation with ensuring as many children as possible can be unalived leaves open the serious question as to why you really became a nurse.

I've taken several biology, microbiology, A&P and chemistry courses. Apparently you have not.
You took some courses. You consider yourself "college educated." Too funny.

Please stop believing in and spreading this sort of dangerous rubbish.
What are you declaring "rubbish" based on your having taken some courses?

Imagine a gullible mom reading this tripe and refusing to have her child vaccinated
Imagine you saying that to healthy adults who were not vaccinated, but who had childhood friends who either suffered severe permanent debilitating side effects, or who died from some vaccine. Each year there are thousands worldwide who die from a vaccine. It's a gamble.

Imagine a mom who would rather her child get chicken pox the old fashioned way, i.e. from other kids, and develop a much stronger immunity to it. It's how humanity has produced its healthiest and strongest people, while avoiding diseases has produced weak people with weak immune systems.

Your rubbish is potentially harmful. Imagine how a mother might feel if her child were to die or become permanently injured because of a government-mandated medical experiment. Would you feel guilty then for contributing to that tragedy because you pushed the DNC disinformation you were ordered to preach? No, of course not. You and your party want children to die.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TOP
I tell ya these kids are amazing at what they can do some times.

Seriously. I don't have a clue how to even access Netflix or any of the various services we have. The TV up here is not a smart TV so it comes witht a dozen remotes and connected peripherals, most of which I'm clueless about. That's Mr. Owl's job to know these things. lol The downstairs TV though is a lot easier as it's a smart one. Smarter than me. lol

I left my phone laying on the couch once and my g-son picked it up, called up the apps, and started playing a game I didn't even know I had. He was four. I think his eccentricities are really interesting. He cannot stand to have any type of liquid on his clothing. He is very sensitive to loud noises and discordant singing. (He tells me to stop when I try to sing as I'm woefully tone deaf.) He is musically gifted like his parents and can play simple songs on their keyboard.

He'll only eat certain foods and abhors others. He needs extra time when transitioning from one task to another. He had a full blown meltdown at the beach last month when he sat on the sand to watch a crab and got his shorts wet. Thankfully my youngest daughter, who is a special ed teacher who deals with this every day, was able to swaddle him in a towel and gently restrain him till he cried it out and we could get dry pants on him. Later on he sat in a puddle to play with the sand and build a little city and thought nothing of it.. Spectrum kids are a challenge!
 
I think at this point you're just trolling IBD :-p.
... or you could hazard an answer.

Why do you think contract killings are OK?

[ for purposes of discussion, a "contract killing" is defined as the killing of living human A by living human B who was paid by living human C for his "unaliving" services. Furthermore, living human A does not get a say in the matter, the killing fee is negotiated between humans B and C, and the entire matter is human C's choice. ]

As to myself, I like to say I'm pro choice.
... or you could say that you are pro-contract-killings. What about contract killings do you find justifiable?

If someone were to ask me what IBD asked you, I'd just say that when it comes to abortion, I'm glad I'm not a woman so I will never have to make a decision as to whether or not to abort a fetus myself.
...and if someone were to say to me what you said to me, I would wonder why you find contract killings acceptable. Personally, I find that alone to make someone a shitty person who should not be walking around in a free society.

From what I've read, most if not all women don't relish having to make this type of choice either.
From what I've read, the Mafia makes these decisions with great care as well.

Again from what I've read, it seems the general reason women who -do- get an abortion is for economic reasons.
Well, the unbrella reason women have for putting a hit out on their own children is "convenience." Less than 1% do so because the mother's life is somehow at risk.
 
I agree with you on a -lot- of what you posted, with 1 caveat- whether it was a planned scam or just an accidental one.
It was a planned scam, the purpose of which was to either get Trump out of office or to ensure he was not reelected.

In other words, when the congressmen who passed the laws that enabled this really trying to create a panic?

Jensen said, "Hospital administrators might well want to see COVID-19 attached to a discharge summary or a death certificate. Why? Because if it's a straightforward, garden-variety pneumonia that a person is admitted to the hospital for – if they're Medicare – typically, the diagnosis-related group lump sum payment would be $5,000. But if it's COVID-19 pneumonia, then it's $13,000, and if that COVID-19 pneumonia patient ends up on a ventilator, it goes up to $39,000."
Yes, so hospitals and counties gave their doctors and medical examiners respectively specific guidance (which actually came from the CDC) to simply hard-code "COVID-19" in the "Cause of Death" section of the death certificate below the actual cause of death, to get it into the "Cause of Death" section. The giveaway is its position under the actual cause of death, i.e. it's fraud, plain and simple.

Jensen clarified in the video that he doesn't think physicians are "gaming the system" so much as other "players," such as hospital administrators, who he said may pressure physicians to cite all diagnoses, including "probable" COVID-19, on discharge papers or death certificates to get the higher Medicare allocation allowed under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act. Past practice, Jensen said, did not include probabilities.
Yes, but don't forget medical examiners (county) who were similarly instructed so that the county would get a financial windfall.
 
The extreme rise in autism numbers is very concerning... It is such a complex issue and there needs to be studies pertaining to more accurate diagnosis... (Not just labeling to give in
to pressures from parents and teachers.)
 
Last edited:
People with an attached brainstem (so not you) will understand that there was never and has never been a childhood vaccine mandate for coronavirus.
You stupid, stupid, stupid fucktard ... or whatever that's supposed to be ... The COVID jab mandate was for adults, not children.
 
The extreme rise in numbers is very concerning... It is such a complex issue and there needs to be studies pertaining to more accurate diagnosis... (Not just labeling to give in
to pressures from parents and teachers.)

The extreme rise in numbers in what? Autism?
 
Good to know.

I get it, you think I'm mistaken and that vaccines are "safe and effective", as the mainstream media puts it.

The road to hell is frequently paved with good intentions. Here's some information about polio and polio vaccines I imagine you haven't heard of:
**
DDT as a possible cause of polio

There is a theory that DDT poisoning was a major contributor to paralysis diagnosed as polio. The timeline supports it, and it is one of those cases where I have to humbly accept not knowing the definitive answer at this very second.

The Salk vaccine was introduced in 1954. DDT was banned in the U.S. in 1972. Polio was officially eradicated in the U.S. in 1979. (The vaccine-derived version of polio (!) is reported to be spreading now in developing countries, and
according to ABC News, “More polio cases now caused by vaccine than by wild virus.”)

In 2021, Ryan Matters published an excellent, in-depth article called, “mRNA ‘Vaccines,’ Eugenics & the Push for Transhumanism,” in which he looked at the link between polio and DDT, among other things. (I very highly recommend reading his entire article.) Matters wrote:

“One crop pesticide in widespread use at the time was DDT, a highly toxic organochlorine that was widely publicized as being ‘good for you,’ but eventually banned in 1972. In 1953, Dr. Morton Biskind published a paper in the American Journal of Digestive Diseases pointing out that:

“‘McCormick (78), Scobey (100-101) and Goddard (57), in detailed studies, have all pointed out that factors other than infective agents are certainly involved in the etiology of polio, varying from nutritional defects to a variety of poisons which affect the nervous system.’

“The danger of toxic pesticides, including DDT, and their disastrous effects on the environment were illustrated by Rachel Carson in her 1962 book, Silent Spring.

“In more recent times, researchers, Dan Olmstead, co-founder of the Age of Autism, and Mark Blaxill conducted two brilliant investigations into the polio epidemics of the 20th century, reaching a similar conclusion to Scobey and Biskind, namely that the disease was caused by the widespread use of neurotoxic pesticides such as arsenite of soda and DDT.

“Although Salk’s vaccine was hailed as a success, the vaccine itself caused many cases of injury and paralysis. And though there does appear to be a convincing correlation between the timing of the vaccine and the reduction in polio cases, as all good scientists know, causation doesn’t equal correlation [sic], especially considering the fact that DDT was phased out, at least in the US, over the same period.”

**

Full article:
Sorry, Scott, I'm not wasting my time reading nutso flack [snip]

Insulting an ideological opponent's beliefs and calling it a day is by far the easiest way of addressing their concerns. That being said, well researched articles and studies don't go away by simply insulting those who bring them up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
I use social media mainly for entertainment purposes. When it comes to the subject of vaccines, I mainly read articles, many of which cite studies. Speaking of articles citing studies, I got a link to the following article in my email today:
A study that did not undergo peer review, that was not even published. How come?

I'm glad you asked. Let's see what the article has to say on the matter:
**
In a U.S. Senate hearing today, attorney Aaron Siri revealed the results of a large study that found vaccinated children were far more likely to develop chronic disease than unvaccinated kids.

The study never underwent peer review and was never published, because the authors — staunch vaccine supporters — told Siri they were concerned about losing their jobs or reputations because their findings contradicted the official public health narrative and vaccine policy.

Siri’s testimony, delivered during Tuesday’s Senate hearing, “How the Corruption of Science has Impacted Public Perception and Policies Regarding Vaccines,” addressed the study’s origins, findings and suppression.

The study involved over 18,000 children enrolled in Henry Ford Health system’s insurance plan in Michigan.

“The results are astonishing,” Siri told The Defender. “For example, vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease (a group of allergic conditions), 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorder.”

These findings were statistically significant — even when accounting for gender, race, birthweight, premature birth, and respiratory distress or trauma at birth.

But rather than publishing the results, the study authors and their bosses at Henry Ford Health refused to make them public — even though the lead author previously assured Siri and Del Bigtree he would publish the results, whatever the findings.

**

Full article:
 
Back
Top