Florida plans to become first state to eliminate all childhood vaccine mandates

... or you could hazard an answer.

Why do you think contract killings are OK?

[ for purposes of discussion, a "contract killing" is defined as the killing of living human A by living human B who was paid by living human C for his "unaliving" services. Furthermore, living human A does not get a say in the matter, the killing fee is negotiated between humans B and C, and the entire matter is human C's choice. ]


... or you could say that you are pro-contract-killings. What about contract killings do you find justifiable?


...and if someone were to say to me what you said to me, I would wonder why you find contract killings acceptable. Personally, I find that alone to make someone a shitty person who should not be walking around in a free society.


From what I've read, the Mafia makes these decisions with great care as well.


Well, the unbrella reason women have for putting a hit out on their own children is "convenience." Less than 1% do so because the mother's life is somehow at risk.
Too funny! This guy calls abortion a contract killing. :laugh:
 
There have actually been quite a few studies that get into plausible associations between vaccines and autism. There's a website that claims to have "a list of abstracts from 239 papers demonstrating the multiple associations between vaccines and autism"
What associations? So there's a website publishing crap. It's like THAT's never happened before!
I personally haven't counted the papers in question, but it certainly does appear to be quite a few. Feel free to take a look:

What I'd like to stress is that no one, to my knowledge, has ever claimed that vaccines are the -only- cause of autism.
Non-sequitur fallacy. Attempted proof by Holy Link.
 
I just pulled up an article on reasons why women have abortions. Convenience was not one of the reasons mentioned.
All of the reasons you cited fall under "convenience," i.e. it would have been inconvenient to keep the baby (for some reason) and thus it was more convenient to just kill the baby and let the killer dispose of the body.
 
It was a planned scam, the purpose of which was to either get Trump out of office or to ensure he was not reelected.
I haven't seen any evidence for either of those positions.
You do that a lot, i.e. turn a blind eye to mountainous evidence surrounding you.

I think the main issue here is that you fail to account for the fact that not everyone sees what you see. We use the term points of view for a reason. There are ways to -change- a person's point of view, however. You believe there are mountains of evidence to support your position? Show me.
 
Alright, so your argument is that hospitals and counties engaged in a scam by giving their doctors and medical examiners respectively [a] specific guide to simply hard-code- "Covid-19" in the cause of death section of the death certificate, but you do mention they were following the CDC's guidance- so was the CDC the true perpetrator and the hospitals and counties were... co-conspirators?
That is a good way to phrase it. Every doctor should know that it is wrong to list falsehoods on a death certificate, e.g. listing "contributing factors" as "the cause of death" or adding "diagnoses" for which were never tested.

An interesting point of view. I wonder if we'll ever hear from one of the people responsible for listing these causes of death. I for one would definitely like to hear what these people have to say for themselves.
 
Alright, so your argument is that hospitals and counties engaged in a scam by giving their doctors and medical examiners respectively specific guide to simply hard-code- "Covid-19" in the cause of death section of the death certificate, but you do mention they were following the CDC's guidance- so was the CDC the true perpetrator and the hospitals and counties were... co-conspirators? I admit that I'm not sure what to believe in all of this, but I definitely think what they did is wrong. I'm just not sure if they saw it that way.
You can be sure. The CDC flat out instructed all doctors and medical examiners to hard-code "COVID-19" under the cause of death in the "Cause of Death" section, just to get it in the "Cause of Death" section when it wasn't the cause of death, and wasn't even a contributing factor.

Can you provide evidence for your beliefs here?
 
Since I don't agree that biological viruses exist [snip]
... then you really have no other position to hold than it was all a hoax.

Yes and no. I see it as akin to religions- I think we might be able to agree that at best, only 1 can be 100% right. The rest either have to at least be partially mistaken. That doesn't mean that all of these religions are trying to deceive anyone, it just means that they believe some things that simply aren't true.

That doesn't mean that some journalists I've come to respect haven't called the Covid pandemic a fraud, it just means that I think it may be more accurate to say that what many people believed regarding Covid simply isn't true. There is one journalist in particular that started looking into the evidence for the Cov 2 virus in particular. He published it near the end of 2020. It's here if you're interested:
 
Back
Top