DOJ announces plans to prioritize cases to revoke citizenship

You don't know what I am talking about because you read none of the articles... Obama used this same law to revoke the citizenship of white supremacists that lied to get naturalization.
I have nothing to substantiate this. I'm not saying that it couldn't have happened, but that I remember no such event, my quick research revealed nothing and I didn't catch the articles you are referencing.

Might the articles you read been partisan disinformation crap? Just wondering.
 
But is it not the DOJ who is planning to revoke another’s citizenship? I know that it has been done sporadically in the past, but the conveyed intentions here appear more wide in scope. It’s scary stuff, especially given this Administration’s direction of punishing critics and political opponents
No, just like it isn't the DOJ "planning" to take away the murderer's freedom. Someone has committed a crime and there will be a trial like any other crime.

You have yet to just simply read the articles that were provided at the beginning to understand what is happening. You've read a headline and got hyperexcited and are ready to "fight" to defend folks that may lose their illegally obtained citizenship because they broke the law.

I'll leave it to you to defend pedophiles and white supremacists, you get ON wit' your bad self.
 
But is it not the DOJ who is planning to revoke another’s citizenship?
No.
I know that it has been done sporadically in the past, but the conveyed intentions here appear more wide in scope.
Lying on a citizenship application is a federal crime, anchovies. Distributing child pornography violates most State laws, anchovies.
It’s scary stuff, especially given this Administration’s direction of punishing critics and political opponents
You are describing Democrats, anchovies.
 
El Salvador is the place where a Democratic senator goes to have cocktails with a Tren De Aragua terrorist and human trafficker who beats his wife.

The “Maryland dad” hero of the far left loons.
Did you see where Tennessee wants to release him from jail pending trial but his lawyers are fighting it?

They say Tom Homan is waiting outside the gates and will deport him.


:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 
LOL

fucking clown shoes

no. Had you said - they can be removed for fraud - you would of been correct on why the story was allowed

but nope. you dumbed it down to words that aren't actually supportable. being racist isn't enough
You are a moron who didn't read the article, Obama used it to revoke the citizenship of folks who lied about being part of White Supremacist groups, you know because they are terrorists... I commented on that little tidbit while noting how the law is applied, per the article.

Obama expanded it. You simply never read the story, knee jerked your response, and pretended to be some sort of expert on "goal posts".

Again. I bullet pointed the original story, you went double down on ignorance for your response. You probably still haven't read the story and will still respond and pretend you have some knowledge that you do not.

Let's see if I'm right and you will do it again.

Your turn.
 
You are a moron who didn't read the article, Obama used it to revoke the citizenship of folks who lied about being part of White Supremacist groups, you know because they are terrorists... I commented on that little tidbit while noting how the law is applied, per the article.

Obama expanded it. You simply never read the story, knee jerked your response, and pretended to be some sort of expert on "goal posts".

Again. I bullet pointed the original story, you went double down on ignorance for your response. You probably still haven't read the story and will still respond and pretend you have some knowledge that you do not.

Let's see if I'm right and you will do it again.

Your turn.
He ran away…just a crybaby who needs to grow up and stop whining.

He also needs to learn that he will get eaten alive when he does not read the story…as you just did.
 
You are a moron who didn't read the article, Obama used it to revoke the citizenship of folks who lied about being part of White Supremacist groups, you know because they are terrorists... I commented on that little tidbit while noting how the law is applied, per the article.

Obama expanded it. You simply never read the story, knee jerked your response, and pretended to be some sort of expert on "goal posts".

Again. I bullet pointed the original story, you went double down on ignorance for your response. You probably still haven't read the story and will still respond and pretend you have some knowledge that you do not.

Let's see if I'm right and you will do it again.

Your turn.
your tired stand on "the article" is sophomoric

stand by your own words clown shoes

or is cut and pasting articles and saying read the article all you are good for?
 
your tired stand on "the article" is sophomoric

stand by your own words clown shoes

or is cut and pasting articles and saying read the article all you are good for?
Translation: Your stance of sticking to the facts presented makes me look bad so I'll pretend I have some magical moral high ground based on the "ignorance is good" rule.
 
Translation: Your stance of sticking to the facts presented makes me look bad so I'll pretend I have some magical moral high ground based on the "ignorance is good" rule.
the facts presented are the facts you presented dip shit
forcing people to comb through pages of prior posts because your words were not sufficient is a cop out
 
the facts presented are the facts you presented dip shit
forcing people to comb through pages of prior posts because your words were not sufficient is a cop out
No... You didn't bother reading the articles... Again. Your believe you have some moral high ground because you ignored the facts on which others based opinions and because of your ignorance had little to offer other than blather.

If you plan on participating in a conversation with people who actually have information, and make it available to you, take advantage of the information so you don't sound like a moron. Just an FYI, there is no "ignorance is good" rule that gives you the moral high ground.

This advice is free.

At this point. You can once again get upset at me for positing based on information readily available to you and tell me how awful I am for doing such a thing... but you are just noise at this point. You insist that your ignorance is better than an informed opinion. I defer to your expertise on how ignorance makes you better, I'll continue to remain informed and likely disappoint you more thereby.
 
No... You didn't bother reading the articles... Again. Your believe you have some moral high ground because you ignored the facts on which others based opinions and because of your ignorance had little to offer other than blather.

If you plan on participating in a conversation with people who actually have information, and make it available to you, take advantage of the information so you don't sound like a moron. Just an FYI, there is no "ignorance is good" rule that gives you the moral high ground.

This advice is free.

At this point. You can once again get upset at me for positing based on information readily available to you and tell me how awful I am for doing such a thing... but you are just noise at this point. You insist that your ignorance is better than an informed opinion. I defer to your expertise on how ignorance makes you better, I'll continue to remain informed and likely disappoint you more thereby.
no. I did read the article. your single sentence summary was in no a reasonable summary of the article. It was a horse shit summary as you missed the key ingredient - FRAUD. not racism. FRAUD

so fuck off shit stain. last word on this is yours. you are a bore this 4th of July to thinking people
 
Back
Top