anonymoose
Classical Liberal
So basically to keep a Ponzi scheme solvent.The more Americans born in the US the more workers there will be in 18 years making contributions to Social Security which will help keep it solvent.
So basically to keep a Ponzi scheme solvent.The more Americans born in the US the more workers there will be in 18 years making contributions to Social Security which will help keep it solvent.
If that's the way you look at it, you can just refuse to take it when you are eligible.So basically to keep a Ponzi scheme solvent.
Then the theft of my hard earned money would be complete.If that's the way you look at it, you can just refuse to take it when you are eligible.
You need to lay-off the drugs.Your signature statement should say 'No Leftist Communist Movement' as Trump is currently destroying that Leftist movement.
Who is your rising star in your Communist Party? Would it be the Communist anti Semite ZOHRAN MAMDANI who is vying to
become N.Y.C.'s next mayor?
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Barely graduated high school
You must of graduated from Trump university.I didn't realize that the lefty communist barely graduated from high school. However, he seems to be quite efficient in his
support for communist ideals as he's trying to incorporate them into N.Y.C.'s highly radical leftist agenda.
Where is this Trump university?You must of graduated from Trump university.
So now, Trump university never existed.Where is this Trump university?
So now, Trump university never existed.
Having an "anchor baby" rewards the parents for their crime.It's interesting that you ignore the Constitution as well. We don't punish children for the crimes of their parents.
Does that invalidate his post?Having an "anchor baby" rewards the parents for their crime.
Taking money from what you know is a ponzi scheme would appear to be a crime.Then the theft of my hard earned money would be complete.
At least I get some of it back by taking it.
Yes. The point of the crime was to have the child so the parents and family could use that child as an excuse to remain in the US.Does that invalidate his post?
So punish the child?Yes. The point of the crime was to have the child so the parents and family could use that child as an excuse to remain in the US.
Knowing involvement in a Ponzi scheme is a crime.Taking money from what you know is a ponzi scheme would appear to be a crime.
We don't punish children for the crimes of the parents.Having an "anchor baby" rewards the parents for their crime.
That isn't. It's not rewarding the parents for their crime. The child being born is still born either way. The child doesn't need to be a citizen of the United States regardless of the citizenship of the parents. In this case, the parents being foreigners deliberately set out to have their child in the US in contravention of US immigration law with the knowing intent the child would become a US citizen and that would confer benefits and advantages to the parents.We don't punish children for the crimes of the parents.
No, don't reward the parents. Think of it this way. The parents rob a bank. Do they get to keep the money even after being caught?So punish the child?
Have you ever existed????Correct, Trump University never existed. Glad to see you're finally catching on.
I can tell you that America has survived for centuries with birthright citizenship being the way it is. It's only an issue for you because it "trolls the libs". My bus boy does not wish to kill me. You fuckers are fucking looney!Not asking to debate the constitution. Forget about that for a minute. Or the intent of the 14th.
And without mentioning DJT.
The stand alone question is: Exactly in what way is it beneficial to America and Americans to have the babies of illegal aliens automatically be citizens?
Go ahead and list the ways it's detrimental too if you're a naysayer to the concept.