Democrats slammed Trump for not sending the National Guard on January 6 now criticize him for deploying it in Los Angeles.

Poor Richard Saunders said:
An online post is an invasion when a President says it is.
Click to expand...
That makes absolutely no sense.

You can do better than this, Poor Richard...... Ehhh, maybe you can't...
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Undocumented persons being in the US is an invasion when the President says it is.
Click to expand...
There is no such thing as "undocumented persons". These are ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS, Richard... I hope that you let them invade and take over your home instead of removing them from your home because they are trespassing, breaking, and entering.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Either the President can declare anything he wants to be an invasion
Click to expand...
WRONG. He can only declare invasions to be invasions, and that's what he's done.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
or he has to rely on the definition being an army with weapons entering the US.
Click to expand...
Invasions do not require armies or weapons.

I hope that you allow illegal alien invaders to invade and take over your home rather than removing them from your home because they are trespassing, breaking, and entering.
 
gfm7175 said:
That makes absolutely no sense.

You can do better than this, Poor Richard...... Ehhh, maybe you can't...

There is no such thing as "undocumented persons". These are ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS, Richard... I hope that you let them invade and take over your home instead of removing them from your home because they are trespassing, breaking, and entering.
Click to expand...
There are no such thing as online posts, they are "illegal invader" posts. See how this works?
gfm7175 said:
WRONG. He can only declare invasions to be invasions, and that's what he's done.
Click to expand...
Wrong. He has declared something that does not meet the definition of invasion to be an invasion. Several courts have already ruled there is no invasion as defined by the law. You are arguing that a President can make up whatever definition he wants when it comes to claiming an invasion. If he can declare something that is not an invasion as an invasion then he can declare anything to be an invasion. There is no gray area there.
gfm7175 said:
Invasions do not require armies or weapons.

I hope that you allow illegal alien invaders to invade and take over your home rather than removing them from your home because they are trespassing, breaking, and entering.
Click to expand...
Aren't you cute wishing violence on me. Your mother must be so proud.
 
Lionfish said:
Poor anchovies,

I can explain it to you, I can't understand it for you.
Click to expand...
You can explain how someone who is not a governor is the governor? I can't wait to hear your explanation.

The law says the guard is activated through the governor. When the governor activates the guard the law is followed.
 
volsrocks said:
Something remarkable is unfolding in America’s political theater exposing a deep well of hypocrisy that rarely makes the evening news. Democrats who just months ago criticized President Trump for not sending the National Guard to Capitol Hill on J6 have now turned on him for deploying the Guard in Los Angeles.

citizenwatchreport.com

Democrats slammed Trump for not sending the National Guard on January 6 now criticize him for deploying it in Los Angeles. - Citizen Watch Report

Something remarkable is unfolding in America’s political theater exposing a deep well of hypocrisy that rarely makes the evening news. Democrats who just - Citizen Watch Report
citizenwatchreport.com citizenwatchreport.com

Bunch of POS hypocrites
Click to expand...
Those assholes don't give a how hypocritical they are the ONLY thing that matters is "get trump".
 
archives said:
So immigration protests being adequately policed by local authorities is to Trump a rebellion and threat of rebellion but the events of 1/6 inwhich the Capitol is violently breached, Congress flees the building for its safety, and the nation’s VP is escorted out of the building in fear of his physical safety, is not?

You can sugarcoat it all you want, frame it as a “normal tourist visit,” but it is what it was
Click to expand...
You mean they were caught up in the exuberanc of the moment on jan 6 just like in LA as nancy piglosi said.
 
Yakuda said:
You mean they were caught up in the exuberanc of the moment on jan 6 just like in LA as nancy piglosi said.
Click to expand...
“exuberanc of the moment,” yeah, if you call busting into the Capitol, forcing Congress to flee, and threatening the safety of the VP of the Nation “exuberance”
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
There are no such thing as online posts, they are "illegal invader" posts. See how this works?
Click to expand...
All I see is your inability to comprehend the English language.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Wrong. He has declared something that does not meet the definition of invasion to be an invasion.
Click to expand...
Wrong.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Several courts have already ruled there is no invasion as defined by the law.
Click to expand...
Wrong.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You are arguing that a President can make up whatever definition he wants when it comes to claiming an invasion.
Click to expand...
Continued inability to comprehend English.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
If he can declare something that is not an invasion as an invasion
Click to expand...
He can't and he didn't.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
then he can declare anything to be an invasion.
Click to expand...
He can't and he didn't.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
There is no gray area there.
Click to expand...
Right. Only invasions are invasions.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Aren't you cute wishing violence on me. Your mother must be so proud.
Click to expand...
Continued inability to comprehend English.
 
archives said:
“exuberanc of the moment,” yeah, if you call busting into the Capitol, forcing Congress to flee, and threatening the safety of the VP of the Nation “exuberance”
Click to expand...
Piglosi was quite comfortable saying burning vehicles and looting was exuberance of the moment. There is no difference. Then the retarded monkeys stormed an ICE field office recently. Piglosi blamed the riots on anarchists not the protestors. You people are ridiculous
 
gfm7175 said:
All I see is your inability to comprehend the English language.

Wrong.

Wrong.

Continued inability to comprehend English.

He can't and he didn't.

He can't and he didn't.

Right. Only invasions are invasions.

Continued inability to comprehend English.
Click to expand...
Your denial of facts is cute.

Federal judge rules against Trump administration in Alien Enemies Act case | Constitution Center

On May 2, a federal judge in Texas determined that the Trump administration is improperly relying on a founding-era law in order to deport Venezuelan nationals living in the United States suspected of gang-related activities.
constitutioncenter.org

Rodriguez concluded the president’s executive order exceeded the powers granted to him under the AEA, based on the judge’s interpretation of the words “invasion” or “predatory incursion” for purposes of the AEA “based on the plain, ordinary meaning of those terms in the late 1790s.”


“For these reasons, the Court concludes that the President’s invocation of the AEA through the Proclamation exceeds the scope of the statute and, as a result, is unlawful,” Rodriguez wrote.
abcnews.go.com

2nd judge rules Trump's use of Alien Enemies Act for deportations is unlawful

A judge has ruled that the Alien Enemies Act "was not validly invoked" by the Trump administration, marking the second time its use of the AEA has been deemed unlawful.
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com
Tuesday's ruling comes after a Trump-appointed federal judge in Texas last week permanently blocked the Trump administration from detaining, transferring or removing Venezuelans targeted for deportation under the Alien Enemies Act in the Southern District of Texas -- ruling that the administration's invocation of the AEA "exceeds the scope" of the law.

At least 2 courts have ruled that there is no invasion as used in the AEA. Your argument is that the President can ignore the legal ruling of "invasion" and declare something that is not an invasion as an invasion.

It seems it's you that doesn't understand the English language. If a President doesn't have to rely on the legal meaning invasion but can make up whatever meaning he wants then he can determine your posts are an invasion.
 
Yakuda said:
Piglosi was quite comfortable saying burning vehicles and looting was exuberance of the moment. There is no difference. Then the retarded monkeys stormed an ICE field office recently. Piglosi blamed the riots on anarchists not the protestors. You people are ridiculous
Click to expand...
And once again, did any of what you are talking about compare to storming the Capitol, forcing elected Congressmen to flee for their own safety, stopping elected representatives from executing their Constitutional responsibilities, and threaten the VP on the nation?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top