Democrats slammed Trump for not sending the National Guard on January 6 now criticize him for deploying it in Los Angeles.

[Nordberg]

Something remarkable is unfolding in America’s political theater exposing a deep well of hypocrisy that rarely makes the evening news. Democrats who just months ago criticized President Trump for not sending the National Guard to Capitol Hill on J6 have now turned on him for deploying the Guard in Los Angeles.

Democrats slammed Trump for not sending the National Guard on January 6 now criticize him for deploying it in Los Angeles. - Citizen Watch Report

Something remarkable is unfolding in America’s political theater exposing a deep well of hypocrisy that rarely makes the evening news. Democrats who just - Citizen Watch Report

citizenwatchreport.com

Bunch of POS hypocrites

I shudder when a thread this stupid is started. Trump refused to send help to the United States Capitol when it was being attacked by an angry mob that was threatening harm or death to the Congressmen and Senators. They were trashing the Capitol and beating the police who were protecting the building.
Trump is sending soldiers to LA for no particular reason, except to lay the ground for doing it bigger soon. It is a local demonstration that the LA cops could have handled easily. Trump was setting a precedent for using the military against civilians. That is why he sent the marines and the National Guard. He is normalizing it. He has a much worse use of the military in his plans.

 

[Lionfish]

The law says the guard is activated through the governor.

I realize this is hard for you but the President took an oath to follow the law. A President is not a governor.

Trump hails ‘big win’ as court rules he can keep control of National Guard troops deployed to LA​

 

[gfm7175]

Your denial of facts is cute.

At least 2 courts have ruled that there is no invasion as used in the AEA. Your argument is that the President can ignore the legal ruling of "invasion" and declare something that is not an invasion as an invasion.

It seems it's you that doesn't understand the English language. If a President doesn't have to rely on the legal meaning invasion but can make up whatever meaning he wants then he can determine your posts are an invasion.

Summarily dismissed. Those activists in black robes are simply attempting to usurp the power of the executive. They aren't ruling based on any law of any sort. All their bogus attempts to usurp power away from the executive are being overturned in appeals.

 

[gfm7175]

Nobody is saying you have to continue.... Just sayin'....

NoNads is now poorly altering my quotes and coming up with a lame name for me because NoNads is so angry and full of RAGE.

Poor NoNads.