Democrats slammed Trump for not sending the National Guard on January 6 now criticize him for deploying it in Los Angeles.

volsrocks

Verified User
Something remarkable is unfolding in America’s political theater exposing a deep well of hypocrisy that rarely makes the evening news. Democrats who just months ago criticized President Trump for not sending the National Guard to Capitol Hill on J6 have now turned on him for deploying the Guard in Los Angeles.


Bunch of POS hypocrites
 
Something remarkable is unfolding in America’s political theater exposing a deep well of hypocrisy that rarely makes the evening news. Democrats who just months ago criticized President Trump for not sending the National Guard to Capitol Hill on J6 have now turned on him for deploying the Guard in Los Angeles.


Bunch of POS hypocrites
The fact you see no distinction shows how fucking stupid you are.
 
Something remarkable is unfolding in America’s political theater exposing a deep well of hypocrisy that rarely makes the evening news. Democrats who just months ago criticized President Trump for not sending the National Guard to Capitol Hill on J6 have now turned on him for deploying the Guard in Los Angeles.


Bunch of POS hypocrites
They never think through what they say.
 
Something remarkable is unfolding in America’s political theater exposing a deep well of hypocrisy that rarely makes the evening news. Democrats who just months ago criticized President Trump for not sending the National Guard to Capitol Hill on J6 have now turned on him for deploying the Guard in Los Angeles.


Bunch of POS hypocrites
So immigration protests being adequately policed by local authorities is to Trump a rebellion and threat of rebellion but the events of 1/6 inwhich the Capitol is violently breached, Congress flees the building for its safety, and the nation’s VP is escorted out of the building in fear of his physical safety, is not?

You can sugarcoat it all you want, frame it as a “normal tourist visit,” but it is what it was
 
... but he has the lawful authority to take over command of the California National Guard under certain circumstances.
Are you saying a Democratic President can call up the Wisconsin National Guard and have you arrested because he doesn't like one of your online posts? That appears to be your stance on the legitimacy of Trump's calling up the guard.
 
Are you saying a Democratic President can call up the Wisconsin National Guard and have you arrested because he doesn't like one of your online posts? That appears to be your stance on the legitimacy of Trump's calling up the guard.
Can't hear you, Pobre...too far down the irrelevancy hole.
 
Any time a Red Hat Clubber purposely leaves off his source you know it is a lie they are posting

Fact is the Governor called in the Guard to assist in the resettlement and care of the immigrants DeSantis airlift to Martha’s Vines as a publicity stunt. Anyone who has ever been or knows anything about Martha’s Vineyard they’d know the local authorities could not address the idiocy on their own (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...grant-marthas-vineyard-desantis-b2168915.html)
 
but he has the lawful authority to take over command of the California National Guard under certain circumstances.
This is not close to being lawful. But back to the point, trump did not take responsibility when it was his responsibility, but is interfering when it is someone else's responsibility.

And he did not even have the paperwork filled out to federalize the Guard. They are not being paid. It will take them years to get paid, and by that time it will be too late to file for reimbursement for their expenses. People will lose their houses over this.
 
Something remarkable is unfolding in America’s political theater exposing a deep well of hypocrisy that rarely makes the evening news. Democrats who just months ago criticized President Trump for not sending the National Guard to Capitol Hill on J6 have now turned on him for deploying the Guard in Los Angeles.


Bunch of POS hypocrites
But wait! I thought you said trump couldn't call in the national guard and that the Capitol rioters were just "peaceful tourists"?

Did you forget your lie again?
 
Any time a Red Hat Clubber purposely leaves off his source you know it is a lie they are posting

Fact is the Governor called in the Guard to assist in the resettlement and care of the immigrants DeSantis airlift to Martha’s Vines as a publicity stunt. Anyone who has ever been or knows anything about Martha’s Vineyard they’d know the local authorities could not address the idiocy on their own (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...grant-marthas-vineyard-desantis-b2168915.html)
Poor anchovies
"Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker then activated the National Guard, which voluntarily relocated the foreigners by ferry to Joint Base Cape Cod where support services existed."
 
So immigration protests being adequately policed by local authorities is to Trump a rebellion and threat of rebellion but the events of 1/6 inwhich the Capitol is violently breached, Congress flees the building for its safety, and the nation’s VP is escorted out of the building in fear of his physical safety, is not?

You can sugarcoat it all you want, frame it as a “normal tourist visit,” but it is what it was
Very well said.
 
Back
Top