Women could even vote when the 14th was writtenThe amendment isn't 5 separate laws, it is one. Each section builds on the others. You cannot take section 1 in isolation and ignore the rest.
Women could even vote when the 14th was writtenThe amendment isn't 5 separate laws, it is one. Each section builds on the others. You cannot take section 1 in isolation and ignore the rest.
I already addressed that.And Congress felt that American Indians prior to the Snyder Act were not citizens regardless of where they were born so there is your Congressional example.
That's not what section 2 says. It clearly states that all--ALL--male inhabitants of a state that was part of the rebellion are ineligible to vote and don't count towards apportionment of members of Congress.So you're saying that females can be denied citizenship?
You cannot ignore the "all persons" part.The amendment isn't 5 separate laws, it is one. Each section builds on the others. You cannot take section 1 in isolation and ignore the rest.
A moment of weakness on my part. I should have realized you are to stupid to know. My bad.Why ask me????
And now lets watch all our resident MAGA legal eagles try and parse and dissect this in order to fit the decrees of their Cheeto Jeezus.
Why did CONGRESS DISAGREE with your interpretation of the 14th?I already addressed that.
@T. A. Gardner says I have to look at the rest of the Amendment.And now lets watch all our resident MAGA legal eagles try and parse and dissect this in order to fit the decrees of their Cheeto Jeezus.
Already addressed.Why did CONGRESS DISAGREE with your interpretation of the 14th?
" Some tribes were treated as separate, sovereign nations, leading to the exclusion of Native Americans from the protections of the Fourteenth Amendment. "
There's your answer
And you can not ignore the and subject to our laws exclusionary phrase. Who does it exclude then. Why were the Indians excluded. If they murdered or raped they were subject to our laws. If they raped or murdered they were sent to prison or hung. Why did CONGRESS pass a act to give them citizenship.You cannot ignore the "all persons" part.
Anyone born in the US is a citizen. No exceptions. Trump is powerless. Period. Only the Congress can amend or add an act.
Your explanation was inadequate. I destroyed your reason. Give a better reason.Already addressed.
They were considered a separate nation. They had to correct it.And you can not ignore the and subject to our laws exclusionary phrase. Who does it exclude then. Why were the Indians excluded. If they murdered or raped they were subject to our laws. If they raped or murdered they were sent to prison or hung. Why did CONGRESS pass a act to give them citizenship.
BIG DEAL El Salvador is a sovereign nation too.Already addressed.
You ignore how the 14th amendment clearly applies to the Civil War (aka "Rebellion") and is not specific to anything else. Post cases like Elk are examples.You cannot ignore the "all persons" part.
Anyone born in the US is a citizen. No exceptions. Trump is powerless. Period. Only the Congress can amend or add an act.
Is it your contention that a child isn't a citizen if it is born to non-citizens in the US, despite the 14th Amendment?BIG DEAL El Salvador is a sovereign nation too.
You do. It is taken as a whole. You can't simply cite one sentence and ignore the rest.@T. A. Gardner says I have to look at the rest of the Amendment.
AI OverviewYou ignore how the 14th amendment clearly applies to the Civil War (aka "Rebellion") and is not specific to anything else. Post cases like Elk are examples.
They were considered a separate nation. They had to correct it.
"All persons".You do. It is taken as a whole. You can't simply cite one sentence and ignore the rest.