Into the Night
Verified User
Inversion fallacy.Random phrasing. No apparent coherency.
Inversion fallacy.Random phrasing. No apparent coherency.
Musk hatters, last I knew many on the right hated Musk’s EV autos, or, any dimwit on the street, are all mass murderers automatically Republican because Republicans support freer gun lawsWho else would they be? They're your fellow deviants and commies. No use denying it.
Drive by one occasionally, eh, Hugo?Yes.
Science isn't funding, Hawk.So long as the Feds are funding most of science and the fake sciences (which is idiotic) of course.
I guess you are really confused because you think a Tesla is a city, a teenage boy, or a police officer.So you have nothing, just weird spin? Okay, we've already seen all that for decades now, gimp.
We do know it's not Democrats, because nobody tried to burn down the city, chase down teenage boys and try to rape and shoot them, and nobody threw fire bombs at police, except maybe the FBI undercovers. You're pretty sad.
Illiteracy: Use of noun as verb. Use of two nouns in the same sentence. Missing verb.With as badly as America now does science the Han doing better turned out to be not difficult at all.
It takes longer than two years to get through college, anchovies. Instructors are hired for more than two years also.Two years ago, so how is that relevant today?
Nothing in particular about Tesla. About EVs in general and the mandates for them.Musk hatters, last I knew many on the right hated Musk’s EV autos,
A gun is not murder, anchovies. Redefinition fallacy.or, any dimwit on the street, are all mass murderers automatically Republican because Republicans support freer gun laws
Random phrases. No apparent coherency. He's not talking about Teslas or trying to compare them to a city, teenage boy, or police officer.I guess you are really confused because you think a Tesla is a city, a teenage boy, or a police officer.
Fake data is a real problem. It's also known as an argument from randU fallacy. A randU is a random number thought up in someone's head (or an algorithm generating numbers thought up in someone's head).At least 1 out of 12 'academics' will fake their data anyway. Some videos for the illiterate here on fake science, at Harvard and elsewhere.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsJvoNpFBA8
It wasn't.The other question is whether or not the President can take away funding that has been given to them by Congress.
Give them time. It's really only a matter of time.What's interesting is how somebody as stupid as you tards haven't died in some dumbass Darwin Award winning act of mindless idiocy.
Math errors.It is going to increase by more than that over trump's term. 20% is only 4.7% a year for four years. Double digit inflation means a rise of 50% or more.
You are blaming your problem on the Dunning-Kruger effect????? No, Poorboy. You have only yourself to blame.You might want to look up the Dunning-Kruger effect. People that spend a lot of time accusing others of being stupid or "tards" tend to be pretty obvious examples.
RQAASo tell us how did Harvard discriminate based on race, color, or national origin
Random phrase. No apparent coherency. No point made. Try to at least follow the conversion, Pretender.The question is "if" and you do not know enough information to support your claim. That is the point.
RQAACiting a law doesn’t answer the question, the request was to show us how Harvard discriminated, cite what they actually did, what they are guilty of
You can't blame Democrats on Trump, anchovies. Democrats don't vote for Trump. They go out and commit arson.The people that set those fires voted for Trump, they were made because Elon abandoned them to go run DC
Democrats again.Let's see what real terrorism looks like...
These are people attacking the US Capitol for political reasons and attacking and injuring police officers.
I'm not implying anything. I am stating it. They are all Democrats. Every last violent nutcase of them.Why, just as silly implying they are all Democrats