T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Those are two out of 20 to 30+ typical topics metaphysics typically debates.Agree. And whether God and free will are actually determinate objects.
Those are two out of 20 to 30+ typical topics metaphysics typically debates.Agree. And whether God and free will are actually determinate objects.
I referred to the two you mentioned.Those are two out of 20 to 30+ typical topics metaphysics typically debates.
Yea, I got that. I was just pointing out that was two examples out of dozens to choose from.I referred to the two you mentioned.
okYea, I got that. I was just pointing out that was two examples out of dozens to choose from.
^^^Is heavily into "metaphysics".^^stalker
^^stalker^^^Is heavily into "metaphysics".
you're an idiot.The laws of logic are believed to be the basis of rational thought. But what grounds logic itself? Surely logic cannot be grounded in logic, for that would be circular reasoning, and therefore illogical. Yale Professor Jacob McNulty argues there is no logical foundation for logic. Instead we should look to Hegel for a solution to this dilemma, according to which logic is derived from metaphysics.
No. But you do not know grade school grammar.you're an idiot.
nihilists hate logic itself.Cause and effect is a logical system that was a fundamental underlying first principle of this universe long before humans showed up.
Says the person who does not know basic grammar.nihilists hate logic itself.
that's why they're so dumb.
omg.No. But you do not know grade school grammar.
bye trollomg.
you think capitalization is grammar.
How hilariously ignorant you are.
very entertaining indeed.
^Illiterate buffoon.all your ponderings amount to nothing meaninful.
![]()
^proto-moronic homunculus.^Illiterate buffoon.
^Illiterate buffoon.^proto-moronic homunculus.
You might be attempting to convey a complex idea about the interplay between time, genetics, and human existence, but the message is so garbled that extracting a clear, logical argument or point from it is nearly impossible for this 'less intelligent' member. If this is meant to be a serious inquiry or statement, it really needs significant clarification to be understood or debated rationally.Rational thoughts are incomplete narratives used ancestrally to govern outcomes of each generation gap alive daily here so far about living eternally separated while genetically inhabiting space daily.
Let me break this down. The physical time the planet rotates each time is 3 minutes and 56 seconds less than the intellectual 24/7 space time continuum is defined by humanity since dawn of civilization started corrupting evey great great grandchild lived since conception replacing its specific 30 ancestors lived previous 4 generations as their 16 great great grandparents, 8 great grandparents, 4 grandparents, 2 creating the conception of each great great grandchild in the whole populaiton living daily here.
Series parallel time the fifth generation gap added develops into the next 2 parenting generation of 5th generation gap added as the original 16 great great grandparents died off after been 1 of 2 parents of the following 4 generations carrying their chromosomes in inverted proportions of thermodynamic use of periodic elements sustaining forms shaped universally here now as norganic universal positions and ancestral displacements inhabiting with the specificity of eacy existing at the same time never same total sum twice, now
'serenity' is mentally ill. He posts nothing but nonsense, for years.You might be attempting to convey a complex idea about the interplay between time, genetics, and human existence, but the message is so garbled that extracting a clear, logical argument or point from it is nearly impossible for this 'less intelligent' member. If this is meant to be a serious inquiry or statement, it really needs significant clarification to be understood or debated rationally.
Can you clarify how you believe the discrepancy between physical Earth rotation time and human-defined time relates to the genetic evolution across generations, where each person's unique genetic makeup from ancestors is somehow tied to thermodynamic principles and the periodic table, suggesting a universal pattern where no two generations are exactly the same?
I'm really trying to understand for some unknown reason, but what the hell.
Good luck!You might be attempting to convey a complex idea about the interplay between time, genetics, and human existence, but the message is so garbled that extracting a clear, logical argument or point from it is nearly impossible for this 'less intelligent' member. If this is meant to be a serious inquiry or statement, it really needs significant clarification to be understood or debated rationally.
Can you clarify how you believe the discrepancy between physical Earth rotation time and human-defined time relates to the genetic evolution across generations, where each person's unique genetic makeup from ancestors is somehow tied to thermodynamic principles and the periodic table, suggesting a universal pattern where no two generations are exactly the same?
I'm really trying to understand for some unknown reason, but what the hell.
This is essentially philosophical realism, where an objective existence is independent of whether humans recognize or understand them. It is contrary to a more nominalist view where these principles are considered human inventions or useful fictions. At least we're dealing with a real debate of legitimate differences of thought.Seems perfectly self evident to me that the principles of logic, the laws of physics, and mathematics itself exist independently of the human brain, in what might be called a metaphysical, Platonic, or ontological reality.