One is okay the other is awfull!

Noone has placed RUsh and Immanuel on the same level, the only point was that Palin was okay with what Rush said and not with Immanuel.

It illistrates her bias.
 
Noone has placed RUsh and Immanuel on the same level, the only point was that Palin was okay with what Rush said and not with Immanuel.

It illistrates her bias.

no it does not. are you saying that everytime palin or someone criticizes obama's chief of staff for something, that if ANY shock jock says the same thing they must issue press releases condemning every shock jock in the world?!?!
 
Has Obama or the admin made a statement on Palin's double standard? Futher, I have not heard anyone argue that Rahm's comments are okay because Rush said it. The point is, why is Palin defending him while condemning Rahm.

I agree, Rahm's position makes his statement different, but that is not how Palin rationalized it.

please show me where palin defended rush
 
no it does not. are you saying that everytime palin or someone criticizes obama's chief of staff for something, that if ANY shock jock says the same thing they must issue press releases condemning every shock jock in the world?!?!

???

Rush is not just any shock jock, gimme a break. She was asked directly for her opinion on Rush and she defended him.
 
What was that comeback you just tossed at me in the discussion about Palin...oh yeah, you said I "couldn't know what she was thinking".

Right back at ya...you couldn't possibly know what Emmanuel was thinking.
I know it wasn't a parody. Don't be fucking retarded.
 
you equated kook with retard, that you can't figure it out, says alot

I did no such thing. I pointed out that she called them kooks then denounced name calling. No where did I compare much less equate kook and retard.

southernman said:
Its hilarious they way you libtards try to attack conservatives with these lame arguments!

Do you realize that you contribute nothing to do the discussion.

He clearly said that the people Rahm was referring to were retards. If you can show us how that is satire, please do so.
 
I did no such thing. I pointed out that she called them kooks then denounced name calling. No where did I compare much less equate kook and retard.



Do you realize that you contribute nothing to do the discussion.

He clearly said that the people Rahm was referring to were retards. If you can show us how that is satire, please do so.

like i said, which you're too dense to figure out....is all name calling the same? hence is calling someone a nigger the same/equal as calling someone stupid?

she didn't say anything about simple name calling, try again.
 
...

He clearly said that the people Rahm was referring to were retards. If you can show us how that is satire, please do so.
Rahm's comment wasn't satire; it was what he actually thinks about liberal activists for daring to admit the true Liberal agenda.
 
Back
Top