WOULD YOU SLEEP WITH STORMY DANIELS IF SHE OFFERED YOU A "FREEBIE"

signalmankenneth said:
There is no petri dish problem, if she spanks your ass with a Forbes magazine?!! And you can also wear a rubber too?!!:)
Around the World with Stormy?
View attachment 26421
Click to expand...
Stormy has a latex allergy she cannot use a condom. She said she raw dogged Trump. Doubtful. She has had hundreds of sexual partners with no condoms. She is a walking petri dish. A not very attractive petri dish. She said Trump was so good she fainted.
 
zappasguitar said:
If a man (Trump) can't keep the vows he swears to (forsaking all others) during a wedding ceremony, then how can anyone believe he'd honor the vows he makes when sworn in as President?
Click to expand...
Who thought he would? Certainly, nobody who knew him or did deals with him. He was a well-known crook and cheater.
 
Stone said:
I have NEVER threatened anyones life here. THAT is a LIE.
Click to expand...
Stone,

Think of it like this...

You are happily married in a genuinely loving relationship with your wife. When you make love with your wife it is not just a physical thing; it ia a spiritual AND physical thing. Right? (also, of course, sex between a husband and wife is how they produce children).

Now, on the contrary, if you see a prostitute who is dressed in a very sexy, salacious manner, and who has a great body, etc; if you paid her to have sex, it would simply be a matter of satisfying the desires of your libido. This is because you have probably never met this woman before and certainly do not have any kind of meaningful relationship with her. The sex you paid her to have with yourself would be merely a soulless, physical/"mechanical" procedure. You do not know the prostitute, you have no feelings of affection or love for her, and she has none for you. The 10-15 minutes of sex you have in your car is just a sordid business transaction. In a very real sense, having sex with a prostitute like this (or any other prostitute) - is no different from manual masturbation.

The prostitute uses YOU (for money) and YOU use the prostitute ( merely for the experience of raw, "fleshy", physical pleasure...to satiate the sensations and libidinal urgings of lust).

I guess the only thing that is IMMORAL about it, is that paying for sex with a prostitute is mutually OBJECTiFYING and therefore mutually destructive of the innate dignity (worth) that all human beings are said to possess in equal measure. Right?.

My point is that if your wife discovered you'd had sex with a prostitute, why would she (like most women in this situation) become hysterically upset and perhaps divorce you? It's hardly as though you had a 15 - min loving, spiritual "relationship" with the prostitute, is it? What you did was not that different at all to two dogs "humping" - it had no more ultimate meaning that the carnal gratification of animal lust in the achievement of an orgasm You and the prostitute will probably feel mutually degraded by what you have done , because when people use each other instrumentally for sex (and/or other material wants/desires - (i.e. purely as a "means to an end") - their conscience tends to haunt them because they have disrespected and degraded the sacred value of another human being/life (which is an "end in itself.)

This is the REAL moral transgression in a married man's having sex outside his marriage with a prostitute/one night stand. And he will eventually pay for it through the lash of his (moral) conscience. But I cannot see - if the man sincerely loves his wife - how sleeping with a prostitute/one night stand represents any kid of serious betrayal of marital trust ?

To make myself clear, I'm not saying that it's a good for men to pay for sex with prostitutes. Paying for sex with a prostitute is wrong (immoral) because the human dignity of both the prostitute and the "John" are devalued....sold for a few lousy bucks. If you pay for prostitutes on a regular basis, your conscience will come gunning for you with a BIG STICK (and it always catches you). My beef is the misplaced moral trauma a wife (or partner) claims to feels when she discovers that her husband has been visiting prostitutes.I would have thought women , IN PARTICULAR, - whose moral and emotional sensibilities are FAR more acute delicate than those of males- would surely realise that for men, having ( "quick- and - dirty ") sex with a standard prostitute is like having sex with a "blow-up sex doll"- there is no exchange of genuine love, nor of the other tender emotions, and is no "higher" spiritual communion (in the act of coitus) etc
 
Just to clarify a few points in my post above...



I used the term "libido" which was coined by Sigmund Freud. Today it is used to refer to an individual's SEX DRIVE or DESIRE FOR SEXUAL ACTIVITY. The libido seeks only one ...immediate gratification of Sexual Desire. Sexual desire is a subjective emotion. Sexual Desire is primarily defined as desire for the pleasure that this contact brings. Sexual Activity is that which fulfils sexual desire for contact with another person's body. Freud located the libido in the unconscious section of his model of the human mind. So the libido was not conscious, nor did it have any inherent SEXUAL MORALITY. To put it another way, there's no morality special to SEX. No act is WRONG purely because of its sexual nature.




Sex is morally neutral, it has no moral category....



What this means is that a man who is having casual sex with a woman he has only met that night is not doing anything immoral when he sucks her bosoms or licks her clitoris, nor is the female committing a moral act per se, when she performs fellatio on her male lover. And what is the act of coitus that takes place between them, buy the insertion of one anatomical piece of flesh (an erect male penis) into the the woman's vagina (another anatomical structure. The different bits and pieces of male and female genitalia, do bot ponder moral precepts while they are engaged in sexual activity. It is not as though while they are making love in a haystack, a tiny moral organ located inside the glans of the male's penis sends up urgent, little messages to the man's brain saying : "Stop this at once ! What you are doing is very bad. What would your wife think !?"




The fact that sex tends to involve one person inserting or rubbing their genitalia on the body of their sexual partner/s, or licking and sucking the other's breasts, nipples or genitalia, or inflicting doses of regulated pain (BDSM) or urinating/defecating on each other's bodies (I think you get the idea of how diverse and "recherche" sexual activity has increasingly become in the West !) all sorts of practices that you might disapprove of, does not alter it status as being MORALLY NEUTRAL. However sex can place individuals in RELATIONS IN WHICH MORAL CONSIDERATIONS APPLY. In other words, sex provides people with an opportunity to do what is otherwise regarded as WRONG: TO HARM, DECEIVE or MANIPULATE or EXPLOIT others against their. For instance the sexual assault or rape of a male or female minor or adult; the sex-trafficking of minors/adult women, paedophilia, deceiving persons into having sex on false pretences, taking advantage of a person's inebriation or drug intoxication to have sex with them without their rational consent. Also, there is the example of the College Professor who has sex with one of his 18 y.o. female students or the Physician who enters into a sexual relationship with a vulnerable patient; likewise, a Lawyer with one of his clients or a Boss with one of his worker. Here exploitation or coercion may be involved and, if so, render this conduct wrongful.




BESTIAL BEHAVIOUR




In ancient ATHENS, the famous Western philosopher, Plato, argued that sex without love expresses our animal natures. The ancient Greek philosophers believe that only man was gifted with reason - the ability to think rationally and logically. They thought that animals did not possess any reason - (well, certainly nothing like what humans had) And reason was a BIG DEAL for philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Socrates and Co. Plato was concerned that while having sex with a woman, a man's reason tended to be largely blotted out of his mind (NB: ancient Athens was a patriarchy, that's why I use the example of a male's mind being sapped of reason during sex with a woman). If you think about it, Plato's right. Think back to the last time you were "going for it" with some stray Hottie you picked up at a TRUMP RALLY ;). What was going through your ming while you were giving this sex-kitten a damn, good seeing to? I bet it wasn't Calculus or Rocket-Science equations. Right? Your capacity for reasoning was probably on a par with my Dachshund's when it is humping a bitch in heat ! A lot of people in America still argue that the loss of rational control during sex has led to casual sex posing a risk for sexual promiscuity, which in turn has created legion social problems in US cities like teenage pregnancy,sexual assault, rape, etc. BTW: NOTE PLATO SAID THAT SEX WITHOUT LOVE WAS THE PROBLEM.




SEXUAL ACTIVITY + LOVE = ROMANTIC LOVE




Imagine a happily-married American couple who are in their early 40s and have been married for a little over 10 years. They have a successful partnership. Their intimate relations as husband and wife could not be properly described as mindless sexual intercourse (and whatever other purely physical sexual activities they enjoy). They do not just fuck each other - this way and that) in order to derive sexual pleasure culminating in orgasm Although SEX-IN-ITSELF is MORALLY NEUTRAL, in the case of a happily-married couple, PHYSICAL SEX and LOVE can fuse into a mutually enhancing shared experience. that you might call MAKING LOVE.




In the case of the married couple I mentioned above, regular sex helps to cement their emotional bond, this boost derives in part from the physical sexual activity they engage in IN THE SENSE that it expresses: INTIMACY; OPENNESS; TRANSPARENCY; VULNERABILITY; POSITIVE COMMUNICATION and a commitment to maintain EROTIC ENERGY. Also, what happens after they have sexual relations - as LOVE-MAKING - is vital as well. Recent research on "after-glow - including pillow talk and cuddling - has found that the feeling of enhanced sexual satisfaction following a sexual encounter can leave partners feeling better for weeks or even months. Where partners worry about why they may not be having sex as often as they once did, interestingly, the research indicates a decline in a couples sex life is more commonly a reflection of problems in the relationship NOT the cause.




Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter
 
Stone said:
I have NEVER threatened anyones life here. THAT is a LIE.
Click to expand...
First he claims it was only a joke, and now he claims it never even happened.

Back to Stone demanding a second chance(or maybe we should call it a millionth chance). He never apologized, or even admitted why he needed a fresh start. I guess when you are a 59 year old trust fund kid, you do not even consider responsibility.
 
Nope. With all the extraordinarily large dicks she's had, this average white man ain't
gonna make her moan in ecstasy (like so many others I've been with) :smile:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top