More Black stupidity. BLM attacks Kyle Rittenhouse for killing two WHITE PEOPLE!!!

[Into the Night]

It's not just 2A. Nomad is pro cop to the death. He views anyone who spoke out against the Floyd murder as a 'thug'.

Floyd wasn't murdered. He died of a drug overdose (fentanyl).

He believes that Rittenhouse was well within the scope of normal behavior

Self defense is normal behavior, Sock.

when he purchased an assault weapon for the sole purpose of murdering someone that night.

He didn't, Sock. You are hallucinating again.

He would have preferred black people, but he couldn't find any.

You don't get to speak for Rittenhouse, Sock. He wasn't hunting people at all. You are hallucinating.

 

[Into the Night]

But he was targeting (with the blessing of the local police) anyone who was protesting against the shooting of Jacob Blake. Blake was arguably a fool, but there was no need to shoot him as many times as he was shot in the back.

By default, Rittenhouse was a hero to Nomad.

Fiction. Stop making shit up, Sock.

 

[RB 60]

It's not just 2A. Nomad is pro cop to the death. He views anyone who spoke out against the Floyd murder as a 'thug'.

He believes that Rittenhouse was well within the scope of normal behavior when he purchased an assault weapon for the sole purpose of murdering someone that night. He would have preferred black people, but he couldn't find any.

Couldn't find any "black people" at a BLM protest? Are you fucking stupid? Yes! You certainly are!

 

[Hawkeye10]

Couldn't find any "black people" at a BLM protest? Are you fucking stupid? Yes! You certainly are!

There are almost no black people in Portland...where the Revolutions paramilitary rioted 100 nights in a row....with zero consequences.

It is well past time 4 U 2 wise the fuck up.

I am not optimistic.

 

[LurchAddams]

Yeah, sure. A bunch of brainwashed little SJW pussies who cannot deal with another person's opinions, attend a speaking engagement then start shouting at him from all directions making it impossible for him to speak.

But it's his fault.

Your logic is as backasswards as the shit you call your brain.



It was a UNIVERSITY.

An institution of higher learning where people at one time, were receptive to hearing other views.

How was he supposed to know a bunch of snotty little assholes were going to buy up all the tickets then pack the audience with SJW crybabies who'd throw a mass tantrum while he was trying to speak?



I'm defending a principle here, not Rittenhouse or his views.

I realize that you can't wrap your head around that because you have no principles.



When you're going against a bunch of effeminate panty waists like you and the rest of this sissy-ass bunch, what do you expect a normal man to do?

Stop acting like girls and I'll stop pointing out how fucking gay you homos are.



I've always advocated stricter gun control laws, and rewriting or possibly even repealing 2A, you dishonest, lying little SJW dick sucker.



I'd rather be pro cop than pro ghetto thug cop killer like you.

Any day of the week.

And I will never believe Floyd was murdered.

That's your Kool Aid and you're welcome to drink it till you puke.



Do I?

Is that what I believe?

Please find a quote of me expressing anything close to that.

OR.... admit that you're a liar.

I'll repeat what I said above.... I'm defending a principle here, not Rittenhouse or anything he's done or said.

The reason why you can't understand defending principles, is because you don't have any of your own.

You think having principles means defending black ghetto trash for no other reason than that they're black and you've been brainwashed into thinking that makes you principled and morally superior.

Newsflash: it doesn't.

It just makes you a lover and defender of trash.



Where did you hear that he had the blessing of the local police?

From some bullshit black propaganda website like those liars at The Grio or The Root?

I've never heard that, and given the lies you've been spouting in this thread, I have no reason to believe you now.

Post a source that confirms that.



The angry ape was resisting arrest and tried to go for a knife on the floor of the car. It got exactly what it asked for.



And for a third time.... I'm defending the principle of free speech.

I've never given two shits about Rittenhouse.

And again.... the reason you don't understand defending the principle of allowing someone to exercise their right to free speech even when you disagree with what they're saying, is because you have no principles.

You are a lover and coddler of black ghetto thug cop killers.

And nothing more.

.

tl:dr

Sorry, Charlie. Walls of texts from angry old men are an automatic "scroll-by" for me. Keep your rants shorter.

 

[Nomad]

tl:dr

Sorry, Charlie. Walls of texts from angry old men are an automatic "scroll-by" for me. Keep your rants shorter.

Liar.

It is far from a "wall of text" and you read EVERY FUCKING WORD OF IT.

You refuse to answer because I nailed you flatter than a board.....

Liar.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Maybe you should brush up on your Constitution. Stop whining snowflakes.

you are in the top 5 of morons who know nothing about the Constitution. it's hilariously ironic that you would tell someone to brush up on something he clearly has better knowledge of than you will ever have.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Liar.

It is far from a "wall of text" and you read EVERY FUCKING WORD OF IT.

You refuse to answer because I nailed you flatter than a board.....

Nomad, I empathize with you on this. I truly do. But you are not going to convince these delusional leftist idiots of the point you are making. They are too full of hatred, self righteousness, and racism to believe anything other than what they are told to by their DNC handlers.

 

[Nomad]

Nomad, I empathize with you on this. I truly do. But you are not going to convince these delusional leftist idiots of the point you are making. They are too full of hatred, self righteousness, and racism to believe anything other than what they are told to by their DNC handlers.

Actually, I think that privately, they agree with me on the issue of his freedom of speech being infringed on.

I think that their hatred, self righteousness, and racism is outweighed by their dishonesty, hypocrisy and devotion to "the cause" no matter how flawed that cause might be.

They cannot see their way clear, nor are they honest enough to admit that the people they have appointed themselves as the protectors of, are far from perfect or blameless.

They have convinced themselves that enemies of "the cause" cannot be tolerated or given any benefit of any doubt.

Race and fealty to black people is the what rules their lives.

Anyone who acts or speaks in any way contrary to that, must be stomped out.

 

[LurchAddams]

Liar.

It is far from a "wall of text" and you read EVERY FUCKING WORD OF IT.

You refuse to answer because I nailed you flatter than a board.....

:f Lia

So, let's get down to what this is all about, which is shutting down speech. Which side do you want to be on? Do you want to be on the side of people who are open to sensible gun access rules or on the side of the folks who block any effort with the "slippery slope" argument? Do you want to be on the side of people who realize that we have been both good and bad actors in history, so we can learn from our mistakes or on the side of people who ban books and want to rewrite history they're not proud of?

Sure, the students in Memphis were rude, and they shut down Rittenhouse after he claimed not to know who was sponsoring him. But Rittenhouse was one of the bad actors. He should have been ready to field questions about Charlie Kirk because it was Kirk's organization that set up his appearance.

You want to condemn the students in Memphis and ignore the other side? That's your right. I feel it's intellectually dishonest to do that.

 

[Nomad]

So, let's get down to what this is all about, which is shutting down speech. Which side do you want to be on? Do you want to be on the side of people who are open to sensible gun access rules or on the side of the folks who block any effort with the "slippery slope" argument? Do you want to be on the side of people who realize that we have been both good and bad actors in history, so we can learn from our mistakes or on the side of people who ban books and want to rewrite history they're not proud of?

Sure, the students in Memphis were rude, and they shut down Rittenhouse after he claimed not to know who was sponsoring him. But Rittenhouse was one of the bad actors. He should have been ready to field questions about Charlie Kirk because it was Kirk's organization that set up his appearance.

You want to condemn the students in Memphis and ignore the other side? That's your right. I feel it's intellectually dishonest to do that.

There are good and bad actors on both sides of every issue.

But this is not about which side of the underlying issue one is on.

I'm for stricter gun control and placing limits on the number of guns that can be manufactured and sold in this country. Placing stiff penalties on gun owners who, through their carelessness and failure to properly secure their guns, allow those guns to be stolen and used in other crimes. I am no gun advocate.

But people should be allowed to speak about any issue on either side, without being shouted at and shut down.

That is the only point I'm trying to make.

 

[LurchAddams]

There are good and bad actors on both sides of every issue.

But this is not about which side of the underlying issue one is on.

I'm for stricter gun control and placing limits on the number of guns that can be manufactured and sold in this country. Placing stiff penalties on gun owners who, through their carelessness and failure to properly secure their guns, allow those guns to be stolen and used in other crimes. I am no gun advocate.

But people should be allowed to speak about any issue on either side, without being shouted at and shut down.

That is the only point I'm trying to make.

Point taken.

 

[Althea]

tl:dr

Sorry, Charlie. Walls of texts from angry old men are an automatic "scroll-by" for me. Keep your rants shorter.

Yea. This struck a nerve with him.

File this under 'ironic as hell'.

Shittenhouse is scheduled to give a lecture about how important it is to retain the right to shoot black people at...Kent State!

You know...the infamous site where students were gunned down by the Ohio National Guard in '70.


Be sure to register for your free tickets, and refuse to show up. It worked in Alabama.

Join us as Kyle Rittenhouse speaks to Kent State University's Turning Point USA Chapter about the importance of the Second Amendment.

You may only register one ticket per mobile number per event. All tickets are subject to first come first serve basis.

 

[Althea]

There are good and bad actors on both sides of every issue.

But this is not about which side of the underlying issue one is on.

I'm for stricter gun control and placing limits on the number of guns that can be manufactured and sold in this country. Placing stiff penalties on gun owners who, through their carelessness and failure to properly secure their guns, allow those guns to be stolen and used in other crimes. I am no gun advocate.

But people should be allowed to speak about any issue on either side, without being shouted at and shut down.

That is the only point I'm trying to make.

In this case, a person who basically violated every regulation that you would like to see in place (but never will) is taking a victory lap because we will never have sensible gun regulations in this nation.

In essence, he's bragging that the NRA (now defunct) owns more than half of the govt., and actively plotting to hunt down protestors is legal.

He has the absolute right to spew his nonsense without being carted off to prison. He does NOT have the right to expect people to accept him everywhere he goes.

As I stated before...he needs to know his target audience.

 

[Nomad]

In this case, a person who basically violated every regulation that you would like to see in place (but never will) is taking a victory lap because we will never have sensible gun regulations in this nation.

In essence, he's bragging that the NRA (now defunct) owns more than half of the govt., and actively plotting to hunt down protestors is legal. .

I would be interested in hearing exactly how you know exactly what he was going to speak about given that he never got the chance to speak.

Do you have the text of his prepared speech?

All that notwithstanding, I see you still cannot fathom the concept of allowing people to speak their minds even though you might find what they have to say abhorrent.

You still seem to think you and those who agree with you, have some divine right to decide what is acceptable speech and what should be booed, shouted over and drowned out.

As if the righteousness of your cause automatically gives you the moral authority to make such determinations.

Next time one of our JPP right-wingers calls you a Nazi, stop and think about this thread and the notions you've put forth here.

He has the absolute right to spew his nonsense without being carted off to prison. He does NOT have the right to expect people to accept him everywhere he goes..

He has the absolute right to expect a crowd of supposedly adult college students to act and behave like mature adults rather than the same spoiled little assholes who talked back to and disrespected their parents and school teachers back when they were younger versions of the petulant, spoiled, immature children they are today.

Why am I not surprised that you are simpatico with them?

As I stated before...he needs to know his target audience.

Conservative NRA supporters go to college too. Was he not supposed to expect the crowd to be comprised of a large percentage of them, too?

It wasn't because apparently your sleazy little Nazi trickster compadres snatched up all the tickets.

But as I said before.... the makeup of the audience is irrelevant. Being SJW ghetto thug lovers doesn't give them an excuse to act like the ghetto thug gangsta trash they admire and strive to emulate.

Once again, no surprise they are your brothers and sisters in "the cause".

 

[Nomad]

Yea. This struck a nerve with him.

Nazi behavior always does, no matter what the politics of the Nazis is.

Apparently it doesn't with you, though as long as the Nazis are on the left.

IOW, the difference between me and you.

File this under 'ironic as hell'.

Shittenhouse is scheduled to give a lecture about how important it is to retain the right to shoot black people at...Kent State!

You know...the infamous site where students were gunned down by the Ohio National Guard in '70.

Be sure to register for your free tickets and refuse to show up. It worked in Alabama.

Translation: Hooray for Nazi tactics!!!!

 

[LurchAddams]

Yea. This struck a nerve with him.

File this under 'ironic as hell'.

Shittenhouse is scheduled to give a lecture about how important it is to retain the right to shoot black people at...Kent State!

You know...the infamous site where students were gunned down by the Ohio National Guard in '70.


Be sure to register for your free tickets, and refuse to show up. It worked in Alabama.

It's almost as if his being booed off stage is the intended result. That way, the wacky right can play the victim and say, "look how we're being persecuted and silenced!". And at Kent State? I hear you, it's like when Trump had one of his rallies in Waco on the anniversary of the Waco siege. It's meant to elicit a response by its venue not on its message.

 

[Althea]

It's almost as if his being booed off stage is the intended result. That way, the wacky right can play the victim and say, "look how we're being persecuted and silenced!". And at Kent State? I hear you, it's like when Trump had one of his rallies in Waco on the anniversary of the Waco siege. It's meant to elicit a response by its venue not on its message.

In researching the Kent state engagement, I listened to a few minutes of Shittenhouse lying to the audience in Memphis.

He claimed 'I was asked to come to Wisconsin'.

That's a fucking lie, and he should be booed off of every stage he ever stands on.

 

[Althea]

I would be interested in hearing exactly how you know exactly what he was going to speak about given that he never got the chance to speak.

Do you have the text of his prepared speech?

All that notwithstanding, I see you still cannot fathom the concept of allowing people to speak their minds even though you might find what they have to say abhorrent.

You still seem to think you and those who agree with you, have some divine right to decide what is acceptable speech and what should be booed, shouted over and drowned out.

As if the righteousness of your cause automatically gives you the moral authority to make such determinations.

Next time one of our JPP right-wingers calls you a Nazi, stop and think about this thread and the notions you've put forth here.



He has the absolute right to expect a crowd of supposedly adult college students to act and behave like mature adults rather than the same spoiled little assholes who talked back to and disrespected their parents and school teachers back when they were younger versions of the petulant, spoiled, immature children they are today.

Why am I not surprised that you are simpatico with them?



Conservative NRA supporters go to college too. Was he not supposed to expect the crowd to be comprised of a large percentage of them, too?

It wasn't because apparently your sleazy little Nazi trickster compadres snatched up all the tickets.

But as I said before.... the makeup of the audience is irrelevant. Being SJW ghetto thug lovers doesn't give them an excuse to act like the ghetto thug gangsta trash they admire and strive to emulate.

Once again, no surprise they are your brothers and sisters in "the cause".

Last time. Save the keystrokes. I'm not reading your nonsense past the first paragraph, as it stinks of your 'get off of my lawn!' mentality.

Because your reading comp. skills, or the lack thereof are on full display, instead of typing slower, (it didn't work the last time)I will simply use extremely large font.

Rittenhouse simply needs to know his audience. If he's appearing in order to take a victory lap for winning a bogus trial, then he should expect to be judged by people who know the facts.

Said facts that were not allowed at trial by the loony judge.

Nobody is denying him his rights. He has not been arrested.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

You racist assholes hate free speech


It’s why you ban books like 1984

HAHAHA. The moron did it again. He calls conservatives racist while he supports affirmative action and wants whites denied jobs just for being white!!