More Black stupidity. BLM attacks Kyle Rittenhouse for killing two WHITE PEOPLE!!!

Nomad said:
Explain how denying someone else their rights by trampling on them, is a right in itself.

How is yelling louder than someone else can talk considered "free speech"?

Especially when the one being shouted down was invited to be there by the institution.

You are very confused.



So rather than have an intelligent discussion, you'd rather just hurl petty insults, eh?

You're doing pretty much what you accused Rittenhouse of doing.... avoiding the issue.

Rather than give honest, rational responses based in reality, you hide behind hyperbole, rhetoric and snide put downs because you know you cannot respond rationally. Irrational behavior cannot be defended rationally.

So, just as you accused Rittenhouse of doing, you're in a sense, tucking tail and running too.

Only rather than walking off of a stage, you're deflecting and moving the goal posts.

I talk about his right to free speech being infringed upon, you respond by calling him a poopy head who doesn't deserve rights.

You, Concert, Evince and the other proggies here truly illustrate the depth to which the SJW indoctrination has taken hold of your minds.
Click to expand...

Maybe you should brush up on your Constitution. Stop whining snowflakes.
 
Concart said:
Maybe you should brush up on your Constitution. Stop whining snowflakes.
Click to expand...

IOW, you cannot give a reasonable or intelligent answer to my question.

How is infringing on someone's else's right, a right in itself?

Please answer or admit that you can't.
 
Nomad said:
So basically you progressives just couch your own narrow-mindedness in the jargon of social justice and petty insults.

Got it. :thup:

Explain to me now, how those immature tantrum throwers somehow had the right to disallow him his right to speak publicly.

What is it that gives them or you or anyone else the right to decide who is and is not worthy of the right to free speech?
Click to expand...

He had 30 whole minutes before he shit the bed and had to leave. You can drop a lot of Nazi propaganda in 30 minutes. Not to worry, kiddo!
 
Nomad said:
Explain how denying someone else their rights by trampling on them, is a right in itself.

.
Click to expand...
Nothing here worth responding to.

Think of the reception you would get if you chose to appear before a room full of black people and gave spewed your 'black bastards are thieves, and Floyd died of natural causes' nonsense.

You would know your audience, and stick to cop meetings to spew your opinions.

Rittenhouse is either whoring for negative attention, or he's delusional. Nobody besides you and the others in the MAGA crowd want to hear him speak. The room looked almost empty in the video I saw.
 
LurchAddams said:
He had 30 whole minutes before he shit the bed and had to leave. You can drop a lot of Nazi propaganda in 30 minutes. Not to worry, kiddo!
Click to expand...

Did he?

Or did he put up with their shit for thirty minutes before saying fuck this?

Prove your claim.
 
Nomad said:
IOW, you cannot give a reasonable or intelligent answer to my question.

How is infringing on someone's else's right, a right in itself?

Please answer or admit that you can't.
Click to expand...
I hope you understand that the right to free speech simply means you cannot be incarcerated for speaking your opinions in public. As you would be in Putin's Russia, and trump's America
 
Althea said:
Nothing here worth responding to.

Think of the reception you would get if you chose to appear before a room full of black people and gave spewed your 'black bastards are thieves, and Floyd died of natural causes' nonsense.

You would know your audience, and stick to cop meetings to spew your opinions.

Rittenhouse is either whoring for negative attention, or he's delusional. Nobody besides you and the others in the MAGA crowd want to hear him speak. The room looked almost empty in the video I saw.
Click to expand...

So according to you, black people have an inherent right to shout people down when they don't like what's being said.

How does your attempt at an example equate to respecting the rights of others?

According to what I've seen out of them and you in the past, black people are not required to respect other people's rights.

But 1) I'm not in the MAGA crowd despite your limp wristed attempt at an insult and 2) you are still avoiding the issue.

But it's not going away.

Rittenhouse has the same free speech rights as anyone else and the SJW pussies trampled them.

And you're defending them.

So typical.
 
Althea said:
Nothing here worth responding to.

Think of the reception you would get if you chose to appear before a room full of black people and gave spewed your 'black bastards are thieves, and Floyd died of natural causes' nonsense.

You would know your audience, and stick to cop meetings to spew your opinions.

Rittenhouse is either whoring for negative attention, or he's delusional. Nobody besides you and the others in the MAGA crowd want to hear him speak. The room looked almost empty in the video I saw.
Click to expand...

He was actually invited by Turning Point USA, an organization founded by Charlie Kirk in order to spew right-wing and pro-trump propaganda.

Here's a little snippet on Chuck K. for ya:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk

Promotion of falsehoods and conspiracy theories
Kirk promotes the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, and has described universities as "islands of totalitarianism".[4][39][40]


In a 2015 speech at the Liberty Forum of Silicon Valley, Kirk stated that he had applied to the United States Military Academy in West Point, New York, and was not accepted.[41] He said that "the slot he considered his went to 'a far less-qualified candidate of a different gender and a different persuasion'" whose test scores he claimed he knew.[42] He told The New Yorker in 2017 that he was being sarcastic when he said it.[42] He told the Chicago Tribune in 2018 that "he was just repeating something he'd been told,"[9][43] while at a New Hampshire Turning Point event featuring Rand Paul in October 2019 he claimed that he never said it.[43]

On July 7, 2018, Kirk falsely claimed on social media that Justice Department statistics showed an increase in human trafficking arrests from 1,952 in the year 2016 to 6,087 in the first half of 2018. He deleted the tweet without an explanation the next day, after a fact-checker had pointed out that the false 2018 number had originated on conspiracy site 8chan.[44][45]

In December 2018, Kirk falsely claimed that protesters in the French yellow vests movement chanted "We want Trump." These false claims were later repeated by President Trump himself.[46]

In defending the Trump administration's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Kirk falsely stated that during the H1N1 swine flu pandemic it "took President Barack Obama 'millions infected and over 1,000 deaths'" to declare a public health emergency.[47][48]

Kirk has spread falsehoods about voter fraud[49][50] and the COVID-19 pandemic.[51] According to Forbes, Kirk is known for "his repudiation of liberal college education and embrace of pro-Trump conspiracy theories."[51]

Racial issues

Charlie Kirk in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, November 3, 2022
Kirk has said that the concept of white privilege is a myth and a "racist lie".[52][53][54] Kirk served on President Donald Trump's 1776 Commission, a response to the 1619 Project."[55] During a September 2021 episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, he called for Texas to create a "citizen force" and have them deport Haitians.[56] Assuming "more hard-right positions", he said that Democratic immigration policies were aimed at "diminishing and decreasing white demographics in America".[32][56] In October 2021, Kirk began the "Exposing Critical Racism Tour" of a number of campuses and off-campus venues to "fight racist theories on America's college campuses!!"[57][58] On the Minnesota leg of the tour on October 5, 2021, Kirk called George Floyd a "scumbag" and appeared to refer to the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol when he said that "if you dare walk into the U.S. Capitol building and take a selfie, they'll put you in solitary confinement."[59]

In November 2021 Fox News article, Kirk wrote that state power should be used to stop teachers from indoctrinating children with critical race theory: "directly confronting the left, and promising to fight their illiberal ideology with state power when necessary, is the key to winning everyday Americans."[60][61]

Kirk used to praise Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. prior to December 2023, variously calling him a "hero" and a "civil rights icon"; by December 2023 however, he began to have a negative assessment of King, using a speech at that year's AmericaFest to describe him as "awful [...] not a good person" and as someone who is admired only because he "said one thing he didn't actually believe". The speech also saw Kirk condemn the Civil Rights Act of 1964, calling its passage a "huge mistake" and alleging that it had created a "permanent DEI-type bureaucracy"; he also spoke of the Act as being something that "really weak" federal courts "just yield to [...] as if it's the actual American Constitution" and as having the supposed ultimate aim of "re-found[ing] the [United States] [...] get[ting] rid of the First Amendment".[61] In January 2024, Kirk said that a "myth" had been created around King which had "grown totally out of control" and that King was currently "the most honored, worshipped, even deified person of the 20th century" despite "most people" supposedly disliking him during his life. Responding to accusations by Malcolm Kenyatta that he was working to undermine King and the Voting Rights Act, Kirk called this claim "a lie" and "fear-mongering", and added that telling the "truth" about King "should not be trampling sacred ground" since he was "just a man [...] a very flawed one at that" and a "mythological anti-racist creation of the 1960s". Kirk later claimed to have "found the sacred cow of modern America" in criticizing King.[62]
Click to expand...
 
Althea said:
I hope you understand that the right to free speech simply means you cannot be incarcerated for speaking your opinions in public. As you would be in Putin's Russia, and trump's America
Click to expand...

It also means that you nor anyone else is supposed to hinder anyone else's.

But respect for the rights of others is not something narrow-minded partisan extremists deal in.
 
Nomad said:
Did he?

Or did he put up with their shit for thirty minutes before saying fuck this?

Prove your claim.
Click to expand...

It was in the article you posted. Try to keep up now, I know it's hard as you're getting your ass handed to you in these Rittenhouse threads, Tiger.
 
LurchAddams said:
It was in the article you posted. Try to keep up now, I know it's hard as you're getting your ass handed to you in these Rittenhouse threads, Tiger.
Click to expand...

No it isn't.

He was there for thirty minutes.

It didn't say how long the shouting went on for.

And again, it's beside the point.

They shouted over any attempt he might have made to respond.

How do you respond to several people shouting questions at you simultaneously?

You don't.

They knew what they were doing.
 
Nomad said:
So according to you, black people have an inherent right to shout people down when they don't like what's being said.
Click to expand...
Save the keystrokes. Rittenhouse's rights were not violated. He wasn't thrown in prison.

You and the MAGA crowd might worship him, but in the real world he will never live down his legacy.

Were the 'very fine people' who shouted "Jews will not replace us!" thrown in prison?

No. Many of them were fired from their jobs.

Actions/consequences.

Stop affording people you adore rights that they simply do not have.
 
LurchAddams said:
It was in the article you posted. Try to keep up now, I know it's hard as you're getting your ass handed to you in these Rittenhouse threads, Tiger.
Click to expand...

Fuck your fake-ass chest thumping, Tiger.

The only ass you've ever handed is your queer boyfriend's.
 
Nomad said:
The university agreed to have him there, so your point is irrelevant.
Click to expand...

He should have responded to the question about his sponsor, Charlie Kirk. His pussing out was his own fault.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...houses-turning-point-usa-speaking-appearance/

“Charlie Kirk has said a lot of racist things,” one student in the audience said while addressing Rittenhouse, who responded, “What racist things has Charlie Kirk said? We’re going to have a little bit of dialogue of what racist things that Charlie Kirk said,” Rittenhouse continued.

The student then listed off a series of allegations of racist comments about Charlie Kirk to which Rittenhouse said he does not “know anything about that.”

Pressed again by the student, Rittenhouse said, “I’m not going to comment on that,” and left the stage amid boos from the crowd.
Click to expand...

Rittenhouse should have responded to questions about the racist fuck who sponsored him. You can't blame the University for the little shit's cowardice.
 
Nomad said:
So according to you, black people have an inherent right to shout people down when they don't like what's being said.

How does your attempt at an example equate to respecting the rights of others?

According to what I've seen out of them and you in the past, black people are not required to respect other people's rights.

But 1) I'm not in the MAGA crowd despite your limp wristed attempt at an insult and 2) you are still avoiding the issue.

But it's not going away.

Rittenhouse has the same free speech rights as anyone else and the SJW pussies trampled them.

And you're defending them.

So typical.
Click to expand...

Don’t worry little snowflake white racists like you can shout people down too!
 
Nomad said:
They knew what they were doing.
Click to expand...
Correct. The question is, 'what the hell did he think he was doing?'

Can't wait to see his next engagement.

His agent should have him selling Tee shirts outside of the next MAGA rally.
 
Althea said:
Save the keystrokes. Rittenhouse's rights were not violated. He wasn't thrown in prison.

You and the MAGA crowd might worship him, but in the real world he will never live down his legacy.

Were the 'very fine people' who shouted "Jews will not replace us!" thrown in prison?

No. Many of them were fired from their jobs.

Actions/consequences.

Stop affording people you adore rights that they simply do not have.
Click to expand...

All you can do is deflect.

If it had been a crowd of Trumpers shouting down some black, ghetto thug praising cop killers, you'd be wringing the tears out of your panties.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top