DOJ Finds Biden is too Mentally Impaired to be Charged - Open

Poor Richard Saunders said:
Earl's question has nothing to do with why he was not charged.
Biden wasn't charged because there was no crime to charge him with based on the evidence.


Biden Exonerated


Meanwhile Trump indicted on 91 counts
Click to expand...

wrong.

the document explicitly says wrongdoing occurred but he could not be charged because he's incompetent.

it's legally ridiculous and you know it.

will you ever stop lying?
 
Hurr went way outside the lines to jab Biden. He turned it into a political act. Joe had no danger of being charged because, like Pence, he cooperated fully. He was not trying to steal them. Trump was and still is. Misplacing documents is not a big deal. When it was found out, it was rectified. Trump still has classified documents stashed.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
My God, you are an idiot.
Care to tell us which page in the report Hurr said what you just claimed?
Click to expand...
Hur also contradicts himself by claiming Biden willfully retained evidence, then later in the report states they have no evidence that he willfully retained them.

When he goes to the Hill, Democrats are going to chew him up!
 
Nordberg said:
Hurr went way outside the lines to jab Biden. He turned it into a political act. Joe had no danger of being charged because, like Pence, he cooperated fully. He was not trying to steal them. Trump was and still is. Misplacing documents is not a big deal. When it was found out, it was rectified. Trump still has classified documents stashed.
Click to expand...

So if a bank robber is caught and willfully gives the money back, he shouldn't be charged?
 
Phantasmal said:
Hur also contradicts himself by claiming Biden willfully retained evidence, then later in the report states they have no evidence that he willfully retained them.

When he goes to the Hill, Democrats are going to chew him up!
Click to expand...
Link? We know your memory is bad.
 
Nordberg said:
Hurr went way outside the lines to jab Biden. He turned it into a political act. Joe had no danger of being charged because, like Pence, he cooperated fully. He was not trying to steal them. Trump was and still is. Misplacing documents is not a big deal. When it was found out, it was rectified. Trump still has classified documents stashed.
Click to expand...

Nordy, your comments rival that of your president.
 
Phantasmal said:
Hur also contradicts himself by claiming Biden willfully retained evidence, then later in the report states they have no evidence that he willfully retained them.

When he goes to the Hill, Democrats are going to chew him up!
Click to expand...

Err, the reason for that comment was the fact Brandon's mind is so gone that there is no way the word "willfully" can apply. Jesus, get a clue.
I would love to hear your comments if the same diagnosis were made of Trump.
 
Nordberg said:
Hurr went way outside the lines to jab Biden. He turned it into a political act. Joe had no danger of being charged because, like Pence, he cooperated fully. He was not trying to steal them. Trump was and still is. Misplacing documents is not a big deal. When it was found out, it was rectified. Trump still has classified documents stashed.
Click to expand...

Biden kept some of the documents from the time he was a Senator when he obviously smuggled them out of a SCIF AND he told his Ghost witter information from the Classified Documents which he said he had in his basement. So Biden kept some of the documents for decades and others for years.
 
QP! said:
Just as matter of clarification, this was a Special Prosecutor finding which is considered Independent from the DoJ.


To the matter this Special Prosecutor transgressed general Prosecution principles that the DoJ and Special prosecutors are supposed to follow, as he basically wrongly did what James Comey, did to Hillary Clinton, when he said 'we are not charging', but then went on to offer his opinion and view on issues that would NEVER then have a chance to be adjudicate in a court of law.

Anyone reasonable can understand why ANY prosecutor saying "I am not charging but here is what I THINK the person did wrong' should be able to understand why that is generally considered wrong and unfair. 'I am not charging him but i still believe he is a pedophile' should make it clear to anyone why that is problematic as the person accused has no venue (no day in court) to address and beat the charges.


This is not specifically about Biden as it is very much the NORM, in cases where one misstated memory can lead to decades of records scouring to try and find if the person said something different prior, and then a perjury charge can follow. Thus why lawyers recommend clients say 'they cannot remember' even if they seem to recall something but are not 100% sure. And yes it can be abused with people saying 'I don't remember' when they actually do remember, and that is a crime, even if one that is super hard to prove.

that this prosecutor offers his OPINION that Biden 'not remembering' is an age thing is simply wrong to do (true or not). He simply should not speculate as a prosecutor.

For instance what would the same prosecutor have to say about the below?







it is absolutely fair for a prosecutor to believe Donald and Ivanka are suffering dementia and that is why they cannot remember, key details or that they are lying.

What is NOT appropriate is for the prosecutor to offer their guess as to why they could not remember.


(and the guess being correct or not, has no bearing on whether a PROSECUTOR should do it)
Click to expand...

Good for you for opening the thread! Earl is too big a pussy to be confronted with truth. I'll do my part to keep your thread above his.
 
QP! said:
Just as matter of clarification, this was a Special Prosecutor finding which is considered Independent from the DoJ.


To the matter this Special Prosecutor transgressed general Prosecution principles that the DoJ and Special prosecutors are supposed to follow, as he basically wrongly did what James Comey, did to Hillary Clinton, when he said 'we are not charging', but then went on to offer his opinion and view on issues that would NEVER then have a chance to be adjudicate in a court of law.

Anyone reasonable can understand why ANY prosecutor saying "I am not charging but here is what I THINK the person did wrong' should be able to understand why that is generally considered wrong and unfair. 'I am not charging him but i still believe he is a pedophile' should make it clear to anyone why that is problematic as the person accused has no venue (no day in court) to address and beat the charges.


This is not specifically about Biden as it is very much the NORM, in cases where one misstated memory can lead to decades of records scouring to try and find if the person said something different prior, and then a perjury charge can follow. Thus why lawyers recommend clients say 'they cannot remember' even if they seem to recall something but are not 100% sure. And yes it can be abused with people saying 'I don't remember' when they actually do remember, and that is a crime, even if one that is super hard to prove.

that this prosecutor offers his OPINION that Biden 'not remembering' is an age thing is simply wrong to do (true or not). He simply should not speculate as a prosecutor.

For instance what would the same prosecutor have to say about the below?







it is absolutely fair for a prosecutor to believe Donald and Ivanka are suffering dementia and that is why they cannot remember, key details or that they are lying.

What is NOT appropriate is for the prosecutor to offer their guess as to why they could not remember.



(and the guess being correct or not, has no bearing on whether a PROSECUTOR should do it)
Click to expand...

It clearly states in the SC's report that "However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecution of Mr. Biden is also unwarranted based on our consideration of the aggravating and mitigating factors set forth in the Department of Justice's Principles of Federal Prosecution. For these reasons, we decline prosecution of Mr. Biden."

Hur just threw in that memory stuff in order to cast a #ComeySlur on Biden. Should Der Gropingfuehrer prevail in November, he hopes to rise high in the Fourth Reich.
 
ExpressLane said:
So they found Classified Documents that Biden smuggled out of a SCIF when he was a Senator and they have an audio tape of Biden saying he had boxes of classified documents in his basement. Would you rather the Special Prosecutor take Biden to trial?
Click to expand...

I'd like to see them try. Sadly for you deplorables, though...

However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecution of Mr. Biden is also unwarranted based on our consideration of the aggravating and mitigating factors set forth in the Department of Justice's Principles of Federal Prosecution. For these reasons, we decline prosecution of Mr. Biden.
Click to expand...
 
QP! said:
I think Special Prosecutor should treat Trump, Pence and Biden all the same.

There is a reason Pence and Biden WERE NOT charged and Trump was and that reason is the attempt to cover up the crime and NEVER give back the material. As they often say 'the cover up is often worse than the crime'.


Trump, Pence and Biden, all giving back the material when the Archives asked, should lead to charges to none.

If any of Pence, Biden or Trump, lies, has lawyers swear out perjurious documents saying all materials were returned and tries to KEEP the materials than that person should be charged.


the crime here to charge is the OBSTRUCTION, and NOT the initial taking and holding of materials, like it or not.
Click to expand...
They are not the same. Trump had the power to declassify Biden and Pence DID NOT. When Trump declared the materials were his they were then deemed declassified.
 
Diesel said:
Good for you for opening the thread! Earl is too big a pussy to be confronted with truth. I'll do my part to keep your thread above his.
Click to expand...

Aren't you special? Continuing to push a thread on how far Brandon's brain has deteriorated is an honorable thing to do. You and Marty are high on my list of lost hero's
 
Last edited:
Honestly, this is a disaster for Democrats. And they need to wake up.

Right now, they are rolling out the red carpet for 4 more years of Trump.

Biden deserves praise. He inherited the mess Trump left him, and the economy is soaring right now. But he is simply too old. Being President is a big job. He's not up to it for another 4+ years, and Trump will likely beat him handily in the fall.
 
ExpressLane said:
If Trump is more senile they should not prosecute him.
Click to expand...

WRONG.

Again because you are stupid you cannot discern that the prosecution is DUE TO Trump obstructing and not the 'taking' of the documents as Pence and Biden BOTH did.


It could be true that Pence, Trump or Biden are suffering dementia with regards to forgetting about taking doc's and that would be a defense (can't form intent) thus why a prosecutor would use their discretion NOT to charge that.


BUt it cannot be true, that Pence, Trump or Biden could go thru the levels of deceptions to cover up and hide and keep the documents, while lying to their lawyers. A jury will see the clear intent and thus why Prosecutor discretion would pursue that charge.
 
RB 60 said:
So if a bank robber is caught and willfully gives the money back, he shouldn't be charged?
Click to expand...

That's the argument you MAGATs are making as to why Trump shouldn't have been convicted of fraud, or have to pay fines or otherwise be punished for willfully and fraudulently cheating banks out of interest and the state out of taxes. "It's not a crime if he paid back the loans."

Oops.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top