White House won’t release evidence that Biden family payments were for loans

They interviewed a lot of people who voted yes on the abortion bill... and asked you basic questions... no one knew what was really in it... they just knew that they were told to vote Yes...
 
It has not been valued by the Court.

Are you starting to learn something here?

Yes it has dipshit. The judge is the "court" and he decided it's worth $18 million. He decided it's "market value". $18 million is NOT it's market value exception that idiots court room.

Are you starting to learn anything here?
 
White House won’t release evidence that Biden family payments were for loans

White House officials will not provide evidence to support President Joe Biden's claim that a pair of large payments he received from his brother represented paybacks for loans, according to a letter from the White House to the House Oversight Committee.

The request for documents to explain $240,000 in checks from James Biden to his brother "concerns a financial transaction between two family members at a time when both individuals were private citizens," White House special counsel Richard Sauber wrote in the letter obtained by the Washington Examiner.


Sauber refused to answer questions from House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) about whether Joe Biden had any documents to back up his explanation for the two checks he received, one totaling $40,000 and the other $200,000, from his brother in 2017 and 2018, respectively.

The checks had been labeled as loan repayments.


In his letter on Friday to Comer, Sauber cited a claim from Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) that suggested the Oversight Committee already has records to prove the payments were loan repayments.

However, a person familiar with the committee's work said lawmakers have no such records.

"Contrary to the White House's and Ranking Member Raskin's claims, nothing within the Oversight Committee's possession clearly shows that Joe Biden did indeed loan his brother large sums of money," the person told the Washington Examiner. "The White House and Democrats have peddled a false narrative instead of providing the loan documents."

Comer has said the payments raise concerns regardless of whether Joe Biden had lent his brother the money, as the timing of the checks would suggest the president's financial standing was directly tied to the fortunes of his family's business dealings.....


========================
Who saw this coming?:laugh: If it was a legit loan it would comply with IRS rules. It did not. The White House could easily clear this up....if Joe had really loaned his brother money....IF he did.

Why should they, as the WH attorney stated, it “concerns a financial transaction between two family members at a time when both individuals were private citizens”
 
Yes it has dipshit. The judge is the "court" and he decided it's worth $18 million. He decided it's "market value". $18 million is NOT it's market value exception that idiots court room.

Are you starting to learn anything here?

THe judge AKA "The Court" did not decide those things, you are really an idiot. Show us where the judge said that? The only thing the judge did was math, e pointed out the percentage difference between the assessed value and Trumps state value. He did not find an actual value.

Why are you so dumb?

Show me a quote where any judge said "the market Value is 18 Million"???
 
The Judge did not indicate what he thinks about about the County Assessor's assessed value, he just listed it as one of the points of evidence.

Why do you pretend?

Even if you are duped into believing your claims... 18-27 is not 18.

Please cite where he claimed Trump overvalued the property by 2300% and how he came to that number. According to your article he only said that Trumps evaluation was 2300% over the tax assessors value... not that the Tax assessor was correct.

It's not worth 18-27. The retard said that was the "market value" it's not. The judge is quoted.
 
THe judge AKA "The Court" did not decide those things, you are really an idiot. Show us where the judge said that? The only thing the judge did was math, e pointed out the percentage difference between the assessed value and Trumps state value. He did not find an actual value.

Why are you so dumb?

I quoted the judge you retarded cockroach.

How retarded are you exactly?
 
THe judge AKA "The Court" did not decide those things, you are really an idiot. Show us where the judge said that? The only thing the judge did was math, e pointed out the percentage difference between the assessed value and Trumps state value. He did not find an actual value.

Why are you so dumb?

Show me a quote where any judge said "the market Value is 18 Million"???

It's the figure he used to determine trump over estimated the property by at least 2300% asshole. Are you really this stupid? Does your fucking brain work?
 
It's not worth 18-27. The retard said that was the "market value" it's not. The judge is quoted.

He is not quoted saying "the market value is 18 million."

That is a flat out lie. I feel sorry for you. He says that the property appraiser said it was worth 18 to 27 million dollars. Then he says that Trump claimed it was between 426 million and 612 million. Then he noted that the difference here is 2,300%.

The Judge did not say the Property Appraiser was correct or that Trump was correct.
 
It's the figure he used to determine trump over estimated the property by at least 2300% asshole. Are you really this stupid? Does your fucking brain work?

He did not say that Trump "over estimated" by any amount. The Judge simply noted how far apart the two numbers were.

If you really believe that you are one dumb fuck.
 
He is not quoted saying "the market value is 18 million."

That is a flat out lie. I feel sorry for you. He says that the property appraiser said it was worth 18 to 27 million dollars. Then he says that Trump claimed it was between 426 million and 612 million. Then he noted that the difference here is 2,300%.

The Judge did not say the Property Appraiser was correct or that Trump was correct.

Yes he is.

Yes he did.
 
Yes he did, called "overvaluation"

You did not include the entire sentence... The judge wrote... "An overvaluation of at least 2,300%, compared to the assessor's appraisal". Not an overvaluation, only an overvaluation compared to...


The moon is very bright, compared to the darkness of space. That does not mean the moon is very bright objectively, in fact the moon is dim, compared to the Sun.


You cant understand basic written English, I understand now why you are so easily manipulated.
 
Wrong. Trump was proven guilty many times. He was found guilty of fraud in the latest case. They are determining what the punishment will be.
In fact, denial of Trump's overt guilt is how he stays in the race. He is simply a scofflaw and an immature bully. You know Trump is guilty in the Georgia case. He practically did it in public. We all heard the audios of his trying to overthrow the election.
He also was blatant in the documents case, stealing truckloads of documents and denying the authorities while trying to keep what he stole.
Yeah, Trump is in fact a repeating criminal and we know it.

Not what I implied you retard.
 
Yes, even then. He has not been found guilty yet.

Now, if your name is Biden, you are guilty even before they uncover any evidence.

Or if you do not have an illegal act to charge him with. The rightys think the ridiculous charges should be adjudicated in the public forum. They have spent years investigating him and have come up empty. Now they want their outrageous lies to be presented to the people while pretending they are doing the work of justice. The right is a bit loonie.
 
So, is he required to prove his innocence before evidence of guilt?

no......but to avoid prosecution he might want to disclose some simple facts.......like maybe a notarized loan agreement......even in that event, does it look good to you that Jim used obvious bribe money to pay off Joe's loan?........
 
no......but to avoid prosecution he might want to disclose some simple facts.......like maybe a notarized loan agreement......even in that event, does it look good to you that Jim used obvious bribe money to pay off Joe's loan?........
Bank records of money going from Joe's account and going to James account would be nice.
 
You did not include the entire sentence... The judge wrote... "An overvaluation of at least 2,300%, compared to the assessor's appraisal". Not an overvaluation, only an overvaluation compared to...


The moon is very bright, compared to the darkness of space. That does not mean the moon is very bright objectively, in fact the moon is dim, compared to the Sun.


You cant understand basic written English, I understand now why you are so easily manipulated.

Look dipshit the assessors evaluation was 18-27 million. That is NOT the what the property is worth. Yes the idiot judge is claiming trump overvalued the property by 2300% compared to the assessors value but the property IS worth 2300% more than the assessors value you retarded cockroach.
 
Look dipshit the assessors evaluation was 18-27 million. That is NOT the what the property is worth. Yes the idiot judge is claiming trump overvalued the property by 2300% compared to the assessors value but the property IS worth 2300% more than the assessors value you retarded cockroach.

Even on the sliding scale you slipped off of from what you originally claimed the judge did, you are still wrong. You are lying.
 
Last edited:
Look dipshit the assessors evaluation was 18-27 million. That is NOT the what the property is worth. Yes the idiot judge is claiming trump overvalued the property by 2300% compared to the assessors value but the property IS worth 2300% more than the assessors value you retarded cockroach.

The Judge simply did not find that the value of Mar-A-Lago wsa 18 Million you lying cockroach.
 
Back
Top