Are Trumppers claiming Trump didn't...

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it... Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. 18 USC 793(e)
 
Of course they deny it. He magically declassified everything just by thinking about. Thankfully for national security, though, we have JOE!

Tgx9I41.jpg
 
Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it... Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. 18 USC 793(e)

What confuses you Jarod - beyond your abysmal grasp of the law, is that you have been programmed to reject the reality that Donald Trump was in fact President of the United States, as such the Commander in Chief with every legal authority to classified documents.
 
Are you claiming that Australian billionaires ARE entitled to received TOP SECRET classified information about US nuclear subs???

Moreso that Chinese dictators are entitled to buy the nuclear launch codes to America's arsenal from Quid Pro Biden.

And I have every bit as much evidence that this happened as you do that Trump gave information about US nuclear subs.
 
What confuses you Jarod - beyond your abysmal grasp of the law, is that you have been programmed to reject the reality that Donald Trump was in fact President of the United States, as such the Commander in Chief with every legal authority to classified documents.

Not when he showed them to Journalists and Australian Business men, not when he acknowledged on tape that they were still classified. All after he was no longer PRESIDENT.... You are so easily fooled.
 
Are you claiming that Australian billionaires ARE entitled to received TOP SECRET classified information about US nuclear subs???

It's only a silly law that Trump doesn't have to follow like all the other laws Trump doesn't have to follow. Surely you must recognize the the founders stated we are a nation of laws (except when it comes to the orange god.)
 
It's only a silly law that Trump doesn't have to follow like all the other laws Trump doesn't have to follow. Surely you must recognize the the founders stated we are a nation of laws (except when it comes to the orange god.)

Oh, you were being sarcastic.

I thought that might be the case, but things are so messed up right now, I wasn't sure.

Jesus H. Christ. We are now in the position of saying that the newly chosen Speaker of the House...is a better choice than...



...wait for it...


...coming...


...Jim fucking Jordan.

How does one deal with that?
 
What confuses you Jarod - beyond your abysmal grasp of the law, is that you have been programmed to reject the reality that Donald Trump was in fact President of the United States, as such the Commander in Chief with every legal authority to classified documents.

Then why is he in court fort it?


Stupid russian tool
 
What confuses you Jarod - beyond your abysmal grasp of the law, is that you have been programmed to reject the reality that Donald Trump was in fact President of the United States, as such the Commander in Chief with every legal authority to classified documents.

So all ex presidents can take top secret documents with them and show them to whomever they wish?



Prove our laws say that
 
Not when he showed them to Journalists and Australian Business men, not when he acknowledged on tape that they were still classified. All after he was no longer PRESIDENT.... You are so easily fooled.

There is no more evidence to support your claim than there is to support my claim that Biden sold the Nuclear Launch codes to Xi Jinping.

On tape he did nothing other than refer to boxes of documents. But you Marxists lie it into a fiction that you can attack him for.
 
Then why is he in court fort it?

He is the enemy of the Fascist democrat Reich and the opposition candidate leading in the polls. Just like Idi Amin or Baby Doc, Xi's man Joe throws his opposition in prison.

Stupid russian tool

You couldn't find Russia on a map if I put your finger on Finland. You drooling retard.
 
All ex-presidents HAVE taken top secret documents.

Your lie about Trump showing them is dismissed.

1) absolutely untrue. Some have.

2) Does that make it legal?

3) How many refused to return those documents?

4) How many tried to destroy their copies of those documents after they were subpoenaed?
 
1) absolutely untrue. Some have.

Lying again, Jarod?

All modern presidents have.

2) Does that make it legal?

I urge you to take an introduction to law class.

When you do, you'll be exposed to a concept known as "precedent."

3) How many refused to return those documents?

It took Obama 3 years to return them.

It only became an issue when an enemy of the Reich was involved

4) How many tried to destroy their copies of those documents after they were subpoenaed?

Oh look, you're lying again. How droll.
 
Lying again, Jarod?

All modern presidents have.



I urge you to take an introduction to law class.

When you do, you'll be exposed to a concept known as "precedent."



It took Obama 3 years to return them.

It only became an issue when an enemy of the Reich was involved



Oh look, you're lying again. How droll.

1) you said ALL.

2) Precedent does not make Felonies legal.

3) Obama admitted he had documents (prove any were classified?) and never tried to hide them or erase tapes of them being moved or drain a pool onto them.
 
Back
Top