WTF? New House Speaker Johnson has an ADOPTED BLACK SON

It because Johnson used him as an example of a black person who did not support reparations, so people are curious who his son is, they started to ask questions, which led to more questions. Politicians should expect to be researched when they are put in a position of power.

Johnson truly does not respect his request that he left out of politics when he uses him as an example.

And when was this discussion about reparation support? And do we know if his son was unhappy that he used his comments as an example? You just don't like Mike Johnson as the new Speaker of the House... so if anyone is wrongly using this young man as a prop of some sorts you (and others)are...
 
When Johnson was picked, many congressmen looked him up on their phones. They did not know who he is. It showed he is a MAGA inside and out. He is dangerous to the continuation of America as we know it. Somehow he is 2nd in line today from being essentially an unknown the day before. Who picked him?

The people who picked Johnson were themselves picked by the people in their districts.

This shit show was made possible by voters, not politicians.

Any ideas as to what to do with the staggeringly stupid voters in red districts?
 
And when was this discussion about reparation support? And do we know if his son was unhappy that he used his comments as an example? You just don't like Mike Johnson as the new Speaker of the House... so if anyone is wrongly using this young man as a prop of some sorts you (and others)are...
Johnson stated his “son” stated when Johnson began his career as a politician that he requested not to be involved.

Newsweek: "When Speaker Johnson first ran for Congress in 2016, he and his wife, Kelly, spoke to their son Michael — who they took in as newlyweds when Michael was 14 years old."

https://www.businessinsider.com/spe...ns-relationship-adopted-black-son-2023-10?amp
 
I like their coffee much more than the burnt tasting Starbucks.

Me too.
I buy their coffee, and at home, I use their K Cups.

Their donuts are not up to the quality that we once got from mom and pop donut shops back in the day,

but they're VERY available, and that's enough to do me in.
 
Johnson stated his “son” stated when Johnson began his career as a politician that he requested not to be involved.

Newsweek: "When Speaker Johnson first ran for Congress in 2016, he and his wife, Kelly, spoke to their son Michael — who they took in as newlyweds when Michael was 14 years old."

https://www.businessinsider.com/spe...ns-relationship-adopted-black-son-2023-10?amp
So yes you're still using him as a prop... Mike Johnson isn't... and we haven't heard a word that his son was upset that he mentioned him...
And when was the reparations comment?
 
Michael is now 40 years old and he does appear in photos when he was first taken in by Johnson. Micheal has lived on his own for YEARS now. So sorry if the fact that he isn't in resent family photos offends your sensibilities. If he was in recent family photos I'm sure you would again say Johnson is virtue signalling. The very fact that Michael is not in the photo points to two possible explanations. Micheal does not live close enough for a family photo or Johnson respects Micheal's privacy more than he wants to virtue signal. Johnson is good man and you are a foul woman.

1. It's spelled "Michael."
2. It's spelled "recent."
3. See #1
4. See #1
5. Should read "Johnson is a good man."

See me after class, "doctor." And bring proof of your bullshit with you. :laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:
 
Do you also hate Johnson for his religious beliefs like your fellow hateful and bigoted leftists do?
Except for the occasional spark, you're starting to sound more like a leftist every day. You should drop the racist shtick.

Oh please don't be so dumb.
 
Johnson certainly made it sound like that sort of relationship. He did not adopt Michael, so legally that was not the relationship. Johnson said adopting Michael was too much trouble. And Michael did not legally reside with Johnson. So did not get access to better schools.

I do not know what their emotional relationship was like. It was 26 years ago, and emotional relationships do not have clear legal records.



You don't even know Michael's last name, so how would you know this?

Toxic doesn't know any of this; she is mostly quoting from Johnson's press secretary's words. The press secretary is white and RW so is believable, unlike that black lady who speaks for Biden, who is "nutty" and "a liar."

I don't know whether Johnson's story of Michael has any truth to it or not. It does appear that he has taken flak from the other racist RWers for his stances on discrimination and racial issues. For instance, he caught hell from his own side for stating that George Floyd was murdered. So whether Michael is a real guy, or some passing kid from long ago that Johnson uses as a prop, at least it appears that Johnson is likely not a racist.
 
Johnson basically used him as a prop is correct. It’s disgusting.

If so, I definitely agree. But... (notice correct use of ellipses here) if he used him as a prop to show sympathy for those experiencing racial discrimination, then I suppose maybe his heart was in the right place.

I'm amused, btw, at how quickly this particular RW talking point spread like a virus. Johnson is against SSM and equal rights for homosexuals. But when a LWer points that out, he's "attacking Johnson's Christian religion."
 
It because Johnson used him as an example of a black person who did not support reparations, so people are curious who his son is, they started to ask questions, which led to more questions. Politicians should expect to be researched when they are put in a position of power.

Johnson truly does not respect his request that he left out of politics when he uses him as an example.

You're right. That didn't occur to me.
 
And when was this discussion about reparation support? And do we know if his son was unhappy that he used his comments as an example? You just don't like Mike Johnson as the new Speaker of the House... so if anyone is wrongly using this young man as a prop of some sorts you (and others)are...

"I know you are but what am I?" Seriously, how old are you, Toxic? At least 70, right?

We don't like frauds. We don't like racists. We don't like treasonous MAGATs. So what? I never heard of the guy till two days ago. Couldn't have cared less if he adopted a Black kid, or not. But when ppl start using a supposed family member in order to excuse racism, like saying it's okay to tell racist jokes because you have an imaginary black husband, people will comment on it.
 
1. It's spelled "Michael."
2. It's spelled "recent."
3. See #1
4. See #1
5. Should read "Johnson is a good man."

See me after class, "doctor." And bring proof of your bullshit with you. :laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:
Righ!. When your debate opponent resorts to becoming a spelling or grammar teacher you have won the debate. ;) I notice you didn't address the issues of the post. Foulwoman.

Note to self: Don't post and watch TV at the same time or Foulwoman will correct your spelling and grammar to avoid the issue. :rofl2: OK I'll bring my diplomas if you bring your LVN license.
 
Last edited:
Righ!. When your debate opponent resorts to becoming a spelling or grammar teacher you have won the debate. ;) I notice you didn't address the issues of the post. Foulwoman.

Note to self: Don't post and watch RV at the same time or Foulwoman will correct your spelling and grammar to avoid the issue. :rofl2: OK I'll bring my diplomas if your bring you LVN licenses.

Dooooccccccctooooooorrrrrr!
 
Back
Top