10 Ways the Marxist Left Manipulates Words to change history and compel behavior

[Flash]

Blatant lie.

There was no election in 2020. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats. I have already shown you evidence of it. Don't try to deny it. Trump did not overturn anything. No crime.
Paying a porn star is not a crime.

Everybody knows we had an election in 2020 despite your crazy proclamations. No state or federal law or constitution "faults" elections.

You have never shown anybody any proof of election fraud. All we ever got was "RQAA."

 

[Flash]

A paycheck is not embezzlement. Redefinition fallacy.

Exactly my point. You can't embezzle money from company funds for personal benefit and call it a paycheck. It is an illegal activity--one of Trump's indictments.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

[h=2]10 Ways the Marxist Left Manipulates Words to change history and compel behavior[/h]

It is the responsibility of the Marxist Left to change history from dystopia to civilization.
That's why it exists, is it not?

Whatever methods they use, this is an example of where the end justifies the means.
The methods may only be judged by how effective they ultimately are.

POWER TO THE PROLETARIAT, COMRADES.

 

[Into the Night]

Delusional.

You are describing yourself again.

You mean Trump made some statements, declarations, speeches that we did not hear because somebody suppressed them?

No, Dimwit.

What did he say and how do you know he said them if it was suppressed?

Irrelevant question, Dimwit.

He says anything he wants on Truth Social. Nobody is suppressing Trump.

Blatant lie.

 

[Into the Night]

Everybody knows we had an election in 2020 despite your crazy proclamations.

You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy. There was no election in 2020. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

No state or federal law or constitution "faults" elections.

Blatant lie. See Article II.

You have never shown anybody any proof of election fraud.

Blatant lie.

All we ever got was "RQAA."

Because you keep mindlessly asking the same question over and over even though it's already been answered. RAAA.

 

[Into the Night]

Exactly my point. You can't embezzle money from company funds for personal benefit and call it a paycheck. It is an illegal activity--one of Trump's indictments.

Pivot fallacy. You never made that point until now.
Trump did not embezzle money. You can't 'embezzle money' from your own company.

 

[gfm7175]

Exactly my point. You can't embezzle money from company funds for personal benefit and call it a paycheck. It is an illegal activity--one of Trump's indictments.

I'm not going to let you wander off into diversions...

Flash: "A person cannot take money from a company and use it for personal benefit."

ITN: "Yes they can. It's called a 'paycheck'."

gfm7175: "A paycheck is "tak[ing] money from a company and us[ing] it for personal benefit", of which [Flash] incorrectly claimed a person cannot do.

Wish to amend that statement of yours? Wish to pretend that you never made that statement? Wish to double down on stupid? The choice is yours...


This is where we are at. So far, you seem to be taking the route of attempting a diversion. It is not working.

 

[Flash]

Because you keep mindlessly asking the same question over and over even though it's already been answered. RAAA.

None of your answers were ever correct. You never once gave us the name of one county that had more votes than registered voters and still cannot.

It is not mindlessly asking the same question when you never gave us one correct answer.

 

[Flash]

I'm not going to let you wander off into diversions...

Flash: "A person cannot take money from a company and use it for personal benefit."

ITN: "Yes they can. It's called a 'paycheck'."

gfm7175: "A paycheck is "tak[ing] money from a company and us[ing] it for personal benefit", of which [Flash] incorrectly claimed a person cannot do.

Wish to amend that statement of yours? Wish to pretend that you never made that statement? Wish to double down on stupid? The choice is yours...


This is where we are at. So far, you seem to be taking the route of attempting a diversion. It is not working.

Money embezzled from a company for personal benefit cannot be defined as a paycheck. It is still illegal

 

[PostmodernProphet]

To Kill a Mockingbird, is pornography?

it is sad you felt compelled to lie.......however, it is not unexpected........

 

[Flash]

Pivot fallacy. You never made that point until now.
Trump did not embezzle money. You can't 'embezzle money' from your own company.

You obviously lied when you said you read all the indictments. Falsifying business records is illegal under NY law.

 

[Into the Night]

None of your answers were ever correct. You never once gave us the name of one county that had more votes than registered voters and still cannot.

RQAA.

It is not mindlessly asking the same question when you never gave us one correct answer.

Blatant lie, Dimwit.

 

[Into the Night]

Money embezzled from a company for personal benefit cannot be defined as a paycheck. It is still illegal

You can't embezzle from a company you own, Dimwit. There is nothing illegal about it withdrawing money from your own company.

 

[Into the Night]

You obviously lied when you said you read all the indictments.

Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Falsifying business records is illegal under NY law.

He didn't. No crime.

 

[Flash]

You can't embezzle from a company you own, Dimwit. There is nothing illegal about it withdrawing money from your own company.

A trust designed to hold the Trump organization assets while he was president is not his "own company."
Even the owner of a company cannot legally falsify financial records by declaring campaign related expenses as "legal expenses."

You have a very perverted view of the law. Prisons are full of business owners who used the company money for "paychecks."

If you really read all those indictments you would know this.

 

[Flash]

Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Argument of the Stone fallacy.

He didn't. No crime.

You don't get to make this decision. That is the job of the judge/jury.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

The Biden administration through its intelligence agencies and departments of State, Health, and Education--promote a certain acceptable word speak and ideology. They work hand in hand with social media giants and a compliant liberal media to force this tyrannical suppression of speech.

Below are 10 ways in which the Marxists and Leftists have changed the meaning of words in America today:

1.) Keeping pornography out of school is redefined as "book banning."

2.) Illegal aliens are redefined as "asylum-seekers."

3.) Opposing the genital mutilation of minors is redefined as opposing healthcare for trans kids and supporting LGBTQ+ legislation.

4.) Opposing the idea of having female athletes overpowered by biological male competitors is redefined as discriminating against trans athletes.

5.) Being opposed to a regulation requiring mortgage applicants with good credit scores subsidizing those with bad scores is being against efforts
to bolster home-ownership for the disadvantaged.

6.) Criticizing the Los Angeles Dodgers for giving an award to a drag queen company that mocks the crucified Jesus Christ, nuns, and Catholics is
redefined as being intolerant to gays.

7.) Parents who complain about their white children being taught they are racist and Black children being taught they are helpless victims are
redefined as being domestic terrorists.

8.) Pedophiles are redefined as "people attracted to minors."

9.) A mother is redefined as a "birthing person."

10.) A girl is redefined as "assigned female at birth."


If you scoffed at ever believing you could succumb to the state's will by saying two plus two equals five, ask yourself if you are now unwittingly
repeating any of the left's new acceptable word speak listed above.

More than pretty creepy, isn't it?


Steve Levy, President of Common Sense Strategies

In my experience all that’s usually needed to persuade 90% of the American public on any completely idiotic idea on any idiotic issue is to be able to speak two syllable words.

My number 1 culture war issue is goofy boys name. It’s a leftist feminazi plot to soften our men up and make sissies out of them.

And I'm getting really sick of guys named Todd!


It's just a goofy - it's a goofy fucking name, OK?

Hi, what's your name?
Todd. I'm Todd. And this is Blake, and Blaire and Blaine and Brent.

Where all these goofy fucking boys names coming from?! Taylor, Tyler, Jordan, Flynn. These are not real names!

You want to hear a real name? Eddie. Eddie is a real name, whatever happened to Eddie, he was here a minute ago. Joey and Jackie and Johnny and Phil. Bobby and Tommy and Danny and Bill, what happened?

Todd. And Cody, and Dylan, and Cameron, and Tucker!

Hi Tucker, I'm Todd. Hi Todd, I'm Tucker. Fuck Tucker, Tucker sucks.

And fuck Tucker's friend, Kyle. that's another soft name for a boy, Kyle. Soft names make soft people. I'll bet you anything that ten times out of ten, Nicky, Vinnie, and Tony would beat the shit out of Todd, Kyle, and Tucker!

That’s why we need to get together and pass a Constitutional Amendment banning women from naming male children. She may bear him for nine months but that poor mother fucker has to live with that name for rest of his life.

That’s why I’m advocating for “The Boy Named Sue” Amendment and I hope I can count on your support!

 

[Jade Dragon]

In my experience all that’s usually needed to persuade 90% of the American public on any completely idiotic idea on any idiotic issue is to be able to speak two syllable words.

My number 1 culture war issue is goofy boys name. It’s a leftist feminazi plot to soften our men up and make sissies out of them.

And I'm getting really sick of guys named Todd!


It's just a goofy - it's a goofy fucking name, OK?

Hi, what's your name?
Todd. I'm Todd. And this is Blake, and Blaire and Blaine and Brent.

Where all these goofy fucking boys names coming from?! Taylor, Tyler, Jordan, Flynn. These are not real names!

You want to hear a real name? Eddie. Eddie is a real name, whatever happened to Eddie, he was here a minute ago. Joey and Jackie and Johnny and Phil. Bobby and Tommy and Danny and Bill, what happened?

Todd. And Cody, and Dylan, and Cameron, and Tucker!

Hi Tucker, I'm Todd. Hi Todd, I'm Tucker. Fuck Tucker, Tucker sucks.

And fuck Tucker's friend, Kyle. that's another soft name for a boy, Kyle. Soft names make soft people. I'll bet you anything that ten times out of ten, Nicky, Vinnie, and Tony would beat the shit out of Todd, Kyle, and Tucker!

That’s why we need to get together and pass a Constitutional Amendment banning women from naming male children. She may bear him for nine months but that poor mother fucker has to live with that name for rest of his life.

That’s why I’m advocating for “The Boy Named Sue” Amendment and I hope I can count on your support!

Libhater doesn't strike me as a Carlin fan.

 

[Into the Night]

A trust designed to hold the Trump organization assets while he was president is not his "own company."

It is his own company, Dimwit.

Even the owner of a company cannot legally falsify financial records by declaring campaign related expenses as "legal expenses."

He did not falsify any records. It was not a campaign expense.

You have a very perverted view of the law.

You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.

Prisons are full of business owners who used the company money for "paychecks."

A paycheck is not a crime.

If you really read all those indictments you would know this.

An indictment is not a conviction nor prison, Dimwit.

 

[Into the Night]

You don't get to make this decision. That is the job of the judge/jury.

But I do. You have not shown a crime. Negative proof fallacy.