Gini Thomas is implicated in fake electors gig

Sure.. If only those mob bosses had just sent a million emails, they wouldn't have been indicted in zymurgy's version of the justice system.

Several people have been convicted for conspiracy to commit insurrection because they sent a lot fewer than a million messages to others.

derp derp
 
ROFL

You Nazis are such fucking retards.

Come out of the closet, Down Under Nazi.

7txrg0.gif
 
I can send the same emails with the same wording to the same people as she did what law would I break?

I am a private citizen she is a private citizen

https://definitions.uslegal.com/c/criminal-solicitation/
A person is guilty of solicitation to commit a crime if, with the purpose of promoting or facilitating its commission, he commands, encourages or requests another person to engage in specific conduct which would constitute such crime or an attempt to commit such crime or which would establish his complicity in its commission or attempted commission. It is immaterial that the actor fails to communicate with the person he solicits to commit a crime if his conduct was designed to effect such a communication.
 
the private citizen could of sent a million emails to a million influential people and it would not be illegal to do so

you are a wack job

Hey stupid.

Conspiracy is a crime and CAN use email as key part.

Simply saying 'I am a private citizen and thus can send any emails i want' is not a defense but a stupid person might think it is.


If she was spreading the "Fake Electors" plan to influence people who could effectuate it, she would be part of the scheme and subject to charges.

You are just wrong... and stupid.
 
Has Gina done anything criminal, why hasn't Biden's secret police arrested her yet?

I suspect she has, but even the article said she's not being investigated.

Every time you run from a question, it proves your dishonesty, Herr Volsrock.
 
Hey stupid.

Conspiracy is a crime and CAN use email as key part.

Simply saying 'I am a private citizen and thus can send any emails i want' is not a defense but a stupid person might think it is.


If she was spreading the "Fake Electors" plan to influence people who could effectuate it, she would be part of the scheme and subject to charges.

You are just wrong... and stupid.

But spreading lies about a Russian conspiracy to possible influence an election is okay
 
Did they do anything criminal, Herr Vols? Why didn't Trump have the secret police arrest them?

Herr Vols needs to understand a Conspiracy charge has two parts.

First is more than one person discussing the commission of a crime.

Second is any actions taken in furtherance of that crime.


That second part is key. It is fine for any two people to just talk about doing a crime. 'We should rob a ban;', 'we should steal this election', but as soon as any ACTIONS are taken in furtherance of that, or towards making it happen, then the conspiracy can be charged to all the people who discussed and planned it.
 
Last edited:
Hey stupid.

Conspiracy is a crime and CAN use email as key part.

Simply saying 'I am a private citizen and thus can send any emails i want' is not a defense but a stupid person might think it is.


If she was spreading the "Fake Electors" plan to influence people who could effectuate it, she would be part of the scheme and subject to charges.

You are just wrong... and stupid.

stating your opinion on election laws and options afforded is never going to be a crime

you retards always look like idiots when it comes to legal issues
 
Herr Vols needs to understand a Conspiracy charge has two parts.

First is more than one person discussing the commission of a crime.

Second is any actions taken in furtherance of that crime.


That second part is key. It is fine for any two people to just talk about doing a crime. 'We should rob a ban;', 'we should steal this election', but as soon as any ACTIONS are taken in furtherance of that, or towards making it happen, then the conspiracy can be charged to all the people who discussed it.
Not a lawyer but that sounds fair to me.

BTW, I suspect the only legal expertise Herr Vols has is standing next to his Public Defender.
 
stating your opinion on election laws and options afforded is never going to be a crime

you retards always look like idiots when it comes to legal issues
Agreed. OTOH, if she participated in a conspiracy to overthrow the election, the it is a crime.
 
stating your opinion on election laws and options afforded is never going to be a crime

you retards always look like idiots when it comes to legal issues

If you are forwarding a criminal scheme that is part of a conspiracy, (Fake Electors Plot), then no amount of hiding behind 'its just my opinion and options' will help from charges for breaking crimes.

Stupid people like you should never opine on legal issues.
 
If you are forwarding a criminal scheme that is part of a conspiracy, (Fake Electors Plot), then no amount of hiding behind 'its just my opinion and options' will help from charges for breaking crimes.

Stupid people like you should never opine on legal issues.

bullshit

you can call a chain email a criminal scheme all you want, but that is just asinine

how many more years of her not being in trouble will it take for your shit heads to realize you are shit heads?
 
bullshit

you can call a chain email a criminal scheme all you want, but that is just asinine

how many more years of her not being in trouble will it take for your shit heads to realize you are shit heads?

Wow are you ever stupid.

Let me explain how the law works and break it down as 'Law for Idiots' for you.


What DOES NOT matter is how many years you lived prior without doing a crime or those crimes not be discovered, as you seem to think is an important part. Ginni's potential crimes are only recently being uncovered and it does not matter if in the years or decades prior she did no crimes.


And to dumb it down even more in the hopes you will comprehend, lets take the example of Bernie Madoff.

As per your point he had about 70 years of 'not being in trouble' before his crimes were found.

It would take a real stupid shit head to say 'he had 70 years of not being in trouble and thus the crimes they are pursuing now (2009) will not happen'.


You really need to do two things. First shut up. Second get smarter.
 
Wow are you ever stupid.

Let me explain how the law works and break it down as 'Law for Idiots' for you.


What DOES NOT matter is how many years you lived prior without doing a crime or those crimes not be discovered, as you seem to think is an important part. Ginni's potential crimes are only recently being uncovered and it does not matter if in the years or decades prior she did no crimes.


And to dumb it down even more in the hopes you will comprehend, lets take the example of Bernie Madoff.

As per your point he had about 70 years of 'not being in trouble' before his crimes were found.

It would take a real stupid shit head to say 'he had 70 years of not being in trouble and thus the crimes they are pursuing now (2009) will not happen'.


You really need to do two things. First shut up. Second get smarter.

let me break it down for you

it is 2023

how many more years of this going nowhere before you shit heads will admit it will never be going anywhere?

the link in this thread even admits it is a nothing burger
 
An FBI agent who worked on the special counsel's Russia probe texted another investigator that 'We'll stop' Donald Trump from getting elected president.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cn...-well-stop-trump-from-becoming-president.html


Have they been charged?

What specific crime are they suggesting with that statement? Who are they urging to commit a crime? There needs to be a crime that is being solicited by the person writing the email.


It is a crime for false electors to file a certificate saying they are the real electors - MI just filed criminal charges against the people that committed that crime.
Did Ginni urge anyone to commit that crime? If so, then she solicited a crime.
 
Even Gini Thomas gets to have an opinion, and they get to have these opinions even if they disagree with Desh. I know that Desh finds it shocking that we allow that kind of thing rather than just bowing down holding our hair back and spewing whatever Desh is vomiting on the internets each day, but we do.
 
Back
Top