Ronald Reagan said, "We are One Nation Under God"

Reagan's "Peace through Strength" and Strategic Defense Initiative AKA "Star Wars" programs, among political initiatives, broke the economic back of the Soviet Union leading to their collapse.

Not quite, the Soviets were already heading in that direction, Gorbachev saw the handwriting on the wall. Did Reagan’s measures bring it about, no, they may have accelerated its demise, but it was going to happen soon anyway, if anyone won the Cold War it was George Kennan
 
you need to stop and rethink what you think you know..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm_Owners_Protection_Act

Signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on May 19, 1986

this banned possession of a machine gun by a civilian if the machine gun was manufacured AFTER May 19, 1986

Although we seldom agree, I am going to help you out here, exchanging with “pidgin” is useless, even when shown his errors, he’ll deflect with something else, using making it all about semantics, or, quickly turning to his Google list of fallacies
 
Not quite, the Soviets were already heading in that direction, Gorbachev saw the handwriting on the wall. Did Reagan’s measures bring it about, no, they may have accelerated its demise, but it was going to happen soon anyway, if anyone won the Cold War it was George Kennan

Debatable.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/reagan-and-gorbachev-shutting-the-cold-war-down/
Ronald Reagan was widely eulogized for having won the cold war, liberated Eastern Europe and pulled the plug on the Soviet Union. Margaret Thatcher, Joe Lieberman, John McCain, Charles Krauthammer and other notables offered variations of The Economist‘s cover headline: “The Man Who Beat Communism.”

Actually, Jack F. Matlock Jr. writes in Reagan and Gorbachev, it was “not so simple.” He should know. A veteran foreign service officer and respected expert on the Soviet Union, he reached the pinnacle of his career under Reagan, serving first as the White House’s senior coordinator of policy toward the Soviet Union, then as ambassador to Moscow. In both the title of his memoir and the story it tells, he gives co-star billing to Mikhail Gorbachev.

Reagan himself went even farther. Asked at a press conference in Moscow in 1988, his last year in office, about the role he played in the great drama of the late 20th century, he described himself essentially as a supporting actor. “Mr. Gorbachev,” he said, “deserves most of the credit, as the leader of this country.”

https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/8774
More than a decade has passed since the Cold War ended, with America's rival of a half century, to the astonishment of even the most optimistic Cold Warriors, slipping into oblivion with barely a struggle, melting to the floor like some Wicked Witch of the East. The archives of the nonexistent Soviet Union are yielding some of their secrets. Though much remains under lock and key, scholars can now thumb through once top-secret documents, including records of Gorbachev-era Politburo meetings.

So what conclusions do the professors now come to? How much credit do they give Ronald Reagan? Few academics of prominence buy the theory (popularized by Peter Schweizer in his book Victory) that Reagan ran the Soviet economy into the ground with his massive defense budget increases and other pressure tactics. Reagan's hard line may have pushed the Soviet Union toward reform. But the consensus is that it was Gorbachev's hare-brained way of going about it that destroyed the Soviet system.

But that doesn't mean Reagan gets no credit for ending the Cold War. He receives some surprisingly high marks for his overall strategy and flexibility in dealing with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. And research by scholars who don't praise Reagan directly lends support to his case.
 
You forgot "Ended the Cold War". :flagsal:
No, he didn’t

[FONT=&quot]In fact, the antagonism of Reagan's early presidency likely prolonged the Cold War by elevating hardline, anti-American voices over those of moderate reformers like Gorbachev. Reagan's true Cold War legacy is rooted in his deeply personal diplomatic engagement with Gorbachev.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Jan 19, 2020[/FONT]

0QcknmAG0IABAJbDMq1Pm QKAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

https://thehill.com › international




[h=3][/h]




















 
Not quite, the Soviets were already heading in that direction, Gorbachev saw the handwriting on the wall. Did Reagan’s measures bring it about, no, they may have accelerated its demise, but it was going to happen soon anyway, if anyone won the Cold War it was George Kennan

No one 'won' the cold war. It's a cold war.
 
No, he didn’t

[FONT="]In fact, the antagonism of Reagan's early presidency likely prolonged the Cold War by elevating hardline, anti-American voices over those of moderate reformers like Gorbachev. Reagan's true Cold War legacy is rooted in his deeply personal diplomatic engagement with Gorbachev.[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#5E5E5E][FONT="]Jan 19, 2020[/FONT]

0QcknmAG0IABAJbDMq1Pm QKAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

https://thehill.com › international




[h=3][/h]














Disagreed but I'm willing to read anything you have to say. Your link isn't working for me.
 

Debatable. The authors seem biased: "Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev’s famous line in the late 1950s that “we will bury you” was not a threat of war, but a reflection that—over the past few decades up to that time—the Soviet economy was growing faster than its Western capitalist counterparts and was projected to surpass that of the West within a couple of decades."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_will_bury_you
While addressing the Western states at the embassy on November 18, 1956, in the presence of communist Polish politician Władysław Gomułka (with Poland being a Soviet satellite state at the time), Nikita Khrushchev said: "About the capitalist states, it doesn't depend on you whether or not we exist. If you don't like us, don't accept our invitations, and don't invite us to come to see you. Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!"[4][5] The speech prompted the envoys from twelve NATO nations and Israel to leave the room.[4][5][6]

During Khrushchev's visit to the United States in 1959, the Los Angeles mayor Norris Poulson in his address to Khrushchev stated: "We do not agree with your widely quoted phrase 'We shall bury you.' You shall not bury us and we shall not bury you. We are happy with our way of life. We recognize its shortcomings and are always trying to improve it. But if challenged, we shall fight to the death to preserve it".[7] Many Americans meanwhile interpreted Khrushchev's quote as a nuclear threat.[8]

In another public speech Khrushchev declared: "We must take a shovel and dig a deep grave, and bury colonialism as deep as we can".[9] In a 1961 speech at the Institute of Marxism–Leninism in Moscow, Khrushchev said that "peaceful coexistence" for the Soviet Union means "intense, economic, political and ideological struggle between the proletariat and the aggressive forces of imperialism in the world arena".[10] Later, on August 24, 1963, Khrushchev remarked in his speech in Yugoslavia, "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own working class will bury you,"[11] a reference to the Marxist saying, "The proletariat is the undertaker of capitalism" (in the Russian translation of Marx, the word "undertaker" is translated as a "grave digger", Russian: могильщик,) based on the concluding statement in Chapter 1 of the Communist Manifesto: "What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable". In his memoirs, Khrushchev stated that "enemy propaganda picked up the slogan and blew it all out of proportion".[12]

Some authors suggest that an alternative translation is "We shall be present at your funeral".[13][14][15][16] Authors have suggested the phrase, in conjunction with Khrushchev's overhead hand clasp gesture meant that Russia would take care of the funeral arrangements for capitalism after its demise.[17]
 
No, he didn’t

[FONT="]In fact, the antagonism of Reagan's early presidency likely prolonged the Cold War by elevating hardline, anti-American voices over those of moderate reformers like Gorbachev. Reagan's true Cold War legacy is rooted in his deeply personal diplomatic engagement with Gorbachev.[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#5E5E5E][FONT="]Jan 19, 2020[/FONT]

0QcknmAG0IABAJbDMq1Pm QKAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

https://thehill.com › international




[h=3][/h]





















So the Berlin wall is still being used by the Russians?
 
Debatable. The authors seem biased: "Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev’s famous line in the late 1950s that “we will bury you” was not a threat of war, but a reflection that—over the past few decades up to that time—the Soviet economy was growing faster than its Western capitalist counterparts and was projected to surpass that of the West within a couple of decades."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_will_bury_you
Is isn’t just this writer, there are numerous historians who have written the same thing. Reagan didn’t cause the end of the Cold War.
 
Is isn’t just this writer, there are numerous historians who have written the same thing. Reagan didn’t cause the end of the Cold War.

He was instrumental in its demise. Now tell me Obama didn't end the Iraq War and Biden the Afghanistan War. :)
 
Is isn’t just this writer, there are numerous historians who have written the same thing. Reagan didn’t cause the end of the Cold War.

Reagan didn't do anymore than any of the other seven Cold War presidents. They all practiced the policy of containment as originally envisioned by Truman.

The USSR came apart at the seams because Gorbachev's reforms unintentionally unleashed a pent up latent nationalism in the republics of the USSR, and Gorby was conciously pursuing a butter over guns strategy which backfired.
 
Reagan didn't do anymore than any of the other seven Cold War presidents. They all practiced the policy of containment as originally envisioned by Truman.

The USSR came apart at the seams because Gorbachev's reforms unintentionally unleashed a pent up latent nationalism in the republics of the USSR, and Gorby was conciously pursuing a butter over guns strategy which backfired.

this crap sounds just as contrived as die hard leftists like evince trying to tell us that the revolutionary war started because of taxes, not attempts to confiscate guns.
 
Back
Top