Georgia prosecutors plan sweeping racketeering indictment of Trump

Trump will be charged and convicted on racketeering charges

  • Agreed

    Votes: 5 45.5%

  • Disagreed

    Votes: 3 27.3%

  • Maybe/I don't know

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • Total voters
    11
T. A. Gardner said:
Trivial objection. Most arraignments are held in mass with each defendant coming forward, the charges are read, and the defendant enters a plea. Unless the defendant is to be held, that's the end of it. Maybe all of five minutes. It isn't really a true courtroom setting.
Click to expand...

Doesn't that depend upon the charges, Terry? Loud party goers being charged with a public disturbance is one thing. Violent terrorists attempting to take down and murder Congressional reps is another.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Doesn't that depend upon the charges, Terry? Loud party goers being charged with a public disturbance is one thing. Violent terrorists attempting to take down and murder Congressional reps is another.
Click to expand...

I think you are in the wrong conversation or thread...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I think you are in the wrong conversation or thread...
Click to expand...
TBH, Terry, whenever the subject of Trump comes up, you think a lot of weird things.

Do you think anyone who has taken an oath to support and defend the Constitution should be held accountable for that oath even when out of the service?

What if they are a retiree? Should they lose their pay and benefits? I do. I believe in stripping the traitorous, oath-breaking pieces of shit of everything. Do you agree or disagree, Terry?
 
Doc Dutch said:
TBH, Terry, whenever the subject of Trump comes up, you think a lot of weird things.

Do you think anyone who has taken an oath to support and defend the Constitution should be held accountable for that oath even when out of the service?
Click to expand...

No, I don't. An oath of office applies while in that office. That goes for being in the military too.

What if they are a retiree? Should they lose their pay and benefits? I do. I believe in stripping the traitorous, oath-breaking pieces of shit of everything. Do you agree or disagree, Terry?
Click to expand...

Anyone, if convicted of a federal felony--any felony--loses those while imprisoned, including social security. They restart on release. As for Jan 6, it was a three-hour riot, so I disagree entirely with your characterizing it as "traitorous," an "insurrection," or having anything to do with previous oaths taken and no longer valid.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Trivial objection. Most arraignments are held in mass with each defendant coming forward, the charges are read, and the defendant enters a plea. Unless the defendant is to be held, that's the end of it. Maybe all of five minutes. It isn't really a true courtroom setting.
Click to expand...

It occurs in a COURTROOM. Trump was required to appear in a COURTROOM. The case has made it to a COURTROOM.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, I don't. An oath of office applies while in that office. That goes for being in the military too.

Anyone, if convicted of a federal felony--any felony--loses those while imprisoned, including social security. They restart on release. As for Jan 6, it was a three-hour riot, so I disagree entirely with your characterizing it as "traitorous," an "insurrection," or having anything to do with previous oaths taken and no longer valid.
Click to expand...
Figures. While it's never been legally tested, an oath is more than just a contract. I understand why you don't abide by your oath, Terry.

Of course you disagree, Terry. You support the actions. Will you be joining any future violent actions supporting your Geezer Fuhrer? Are you itching to kill grooming, socialist Libruls like your fellow JPP Trumpers?

7qqvyh.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top