How was Hunter indicted if they never investigated? The whistleblowers claims can't be true based on the facts in evidence.
Several people have testified or stated that the whistleblower was wrong about several things.
US says missing GOP whistleblower is arms trafficker, Chinese agent
- Thread starter Nomad
- Start date
How was Hunter indicted if they never investigated? The whistleblowers claims can't be true based on the facts in evidence.
Several people have testified or stated that the whistleblower was wrong about several things.
Luft is the alleged whistleblower related to the bribery investigation. Claiming he has nothing to do with the alleged bribery is ridiculous since it would mean Luft knows nothing about anything and can't testify to anything.
Tinkerpeach
Member
did
He was investigated for those charges but not the other claims.
And if there was no proof then why is congress investigating Hunter and coming up with evidence based on the whistleblowers statements?
Why did the FBI not follow up on them?
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
But if he was involved in the bribery scheme then Bagman (Hunter) was too, along with business associates, and possibly Joke himself as well. Certainly Bagman deserves indictment for the same charges as Luft in this case.
Tinkerpeach
Member
They don't need him to testify.
He was simply a guy that made claims which started this whole thing.
Congress is gathering all the evidence they need from interviewing many people from the FBI and the DOJ.
Consider Luft to be the Deepthroat of this investigation, simply someone who brought this issue to light.
QP!
Verified User
Again you show your inability to follow a conversation.
My last post was not about Trump challenging an election. It was about ALL THINGS republican in terms of challenges, investigations, court cases and hiring.
Republi'cans' are losing across the board in ALL areas.
It is a Republican POTUS (Trump) along with his Republi'can' AG who picks the life long republican head of the FBI.
Because that FBI head, like those Republi'cans'' before him, do not find Dem criminality and DO FIND boat loads of republi'can' criminality when they launch investigations, you then suggest that republi'can' is a deep state Dem and "covering" for the Dems.
That points to the republi'cans' Trump et al, being hopeless inept and stupid, and the Dems operating at genius level, that even when the Republi'cans' control every level (POTUS, AG, Courts, SC, FBi head), they cannot get any wins while the Dems rack up win after win after win, and the convictions pile up.
QP!
Verified User
Tinker is the person who claimed that Wray was lying constantly to congress.
When asked to cite one single lie he told the response was that 'since he was lying, Tinker could not know which of the statements were true or not but because liars never admit...voila Wary is guilty of lying'.
the poster is either a troll or just the worst and most stupid debater ever. I mean painfully stupid posts, so maybe 'both'?
Deep Throat wasn't under indictment and on the lam.
QP!
Verified User
Marjorie Greene or Lauren Boeberts account, maybe?
He was investigated on everything. For five years. They found nothing related to the President. Your 'whistleblowers' either don't exist or are indicted felons. The FBI did not follow up because there was nothing to follow up on. TRUMPS DOJ did the investigating and found nothing.
You lose, Nora.
Tinkerpeach
Member
Tinkerpeach
Member
We also didn't have a corrupt DOJ and FBI back then either.
Congress is putting on a show for stupid fucks like you. They have found nothing. And they embarrassingly fell for a Chinese Agent who is on the run from authorities. Stupid is as stupid does.
So Trumps DOJ was corrupt, Nora?
Tinkerpeach
Member
QP!
Verified User
Republi'cans' learned a tough lesson with the Giuliani drunk lady whistleblower, that it is far better to never have the whistleblower found or show up, so they can claim they are 'immensely credible', and not have that fall apart when the public sees them and laughs at the republi'cans' over it.
Lets never forget that the Republi'cans' assessed this lady and found her credible ENOUGH, in their view to present and none of the whistleblowers since her have they thought are as credible as her and presentable...
Tinkerpeach
Member
Yes