You lied - we both know it.
Lying is what you do.
You have your party - which is all you care about. But you don't have even a shred of integrity.
^^^
I❤Irony
JPP's biggest lying wife-beating Nazi calling others liars and lacking integrity.

You lied - we both know it.
Lying is what you do.
You have your party - which is all you care about. But you don't have even a shred of integrity.

I never saw any Trump stockings. He must not acknowledge any of his kids.
Well stated
“The pets have political value. The little girl does not. Can't collect bribes off of an illegitimate child..“
LOL. You keep bringing up the stockings hung on the mantle. When I grew up, we only put up stockings for those who were going to be there to get in their stockings. It wasn't a crime to not put up a stocking for someone that wasn't going to be there on Christmas.
When did Trump put up any stockings?
I am in another thread where they are mocking that Joe could be 'proud' of Hunter as if the history of his failure makes it wrong for a parent to be proud if that child survives all that disfunction is on the road to recovery.
The same person who claimed how they would have sorted out Hunter much earlier by simply putting their foot down... then says or kicked him out of the house.
So 'it is easy to succeed in these tough parental issues if you just follow our instructions and do X', but if the kid does not succeed 'just kick them out'.
But if instead the kid does not succeed right away and you stand by them as best you can and help them until they do finally come out of it, you are to be mocked for being 'proud' as they would have kicked them out long before and if they die, they die.
No one wants 'easy parenting' advice from right wingers. They are the worst examples to get it from. All empty 'easy' talking points while kicking out kids who do not succeed. And the next day turning and judging others again and telling them how easy their issues are to solve.
But they do deny her.. as he states many times he has six grandchildren... he names them... he brags about them and talks about how much he loves them.. he denies her... there is no excuse.. stop making them for him... and Jill... it's even worse that she doesn't correct the situation...
LOL. You keep bringing up the stockings hung on the mantle. When I grew up, we only put up stockings for those who were going to be there to get in their stockings. It wasn't a crime to not put up a stocking for someone that wasn't going to be there on Christmas.
When did Trump put up any stockings?
I don’t care enough to prove it to you, if you want to know, you can easily look it up.
See but that is what TOP does.
In my family stockings too were only for those attending as they held the night before xmas gifts we would open. Everyone got their stocking on xmas eve.
TOP is the person who would visit my family home and see stockings for 15 family members, some kids, some cousins, etc, and assume the kids stocking not up or cousins not up meant we did not like or love them as much.
TOP would have no clue it was because those family members were not attending our home, and thus did not get a stocking hung.
TOP would not GAF about telling others outside our family how we only cared about certain cousins and not others, certain kids and not others based on nothing more than TOPs assumption that any kid or cousin who gets no stocking must be not liked or neglected.
That is why say people like TOP are the worst type of people in a community and i mean that with no hyperbole. They SEE bits of inter family dynamics and assume the rest and are perfectly ok with then sharing their guesses as if factual.
Fine concluding and telling other neighbors, 'oh the neighbors only like their oldest child and not their youngest'. Based on TOPs determination that is what a missing stocking means. TOP needs no facts beyond that. That the youngest might be with other family that xmas holiday and thus no stocking will not deter TOP telling others the parents do not love the youngest like they do the older child. Facts be damned.
So you didn't put up stockings for let's say someone who was in the military or in college? The good point she should have been there for Christmas...I guess that rests that case...
![]()
So you didn't put up stockings for let's say someone who was in the military or in college? The good point she should have been there for Christmas...I guess that rests that case...
![]()
Bottom line.. the Bidens deny there 7th grandchild...
Can you point us to a time when Biden mentions his 6 grandchildren?
They got daddy issues.
I guess if you completely ignore the court rulings and the wishes of the girl's family, then you could make that case. You are too interested in abusing a 4 year old to make political points rather then looking at what is in the best interest of the child.
In 2019, the court ruled to keep the child's name secret in the best interests of the child.
In 2023 the court ruled to keep the child's name secret in the best interests of the child.
It would appear Biden is interested in the best interests of the child while you are determined to abuse that child.
Bottom line.. the Bidens deny there 7th grandchild...
The Clerk of the Court shall keep the unredacted version of this Order and all other sealed documents filed in the record of this case in a secure location inaccessible by the public and shall permit no one but the Court, essential members of the Clerk's staff, the parties, or the attorneys of record for the parties from accessing the unredacted copy of this Order. Such action is in the best interest of the child.
Bottom line dividends denied their 7th grandchild... everyone knows her name she knows who her father and Grandparents are... it is clear that the Biden's best interests are not for the child... I blame Hunter more than them though he's the one that ramped all this up... all they had to do was acknowledge her and no one would have said a word... but Joe goes out of his way to be all about the 6...
I guess if you completely ignore the court rulings and the wishes of the girl's family, then you could make that case. You are too interested in abusing a 4 year old to make political points rather then looking at what is in the best interest of the child.
In 2019, the court ruled to keep the child's name secret in the best interests of the child.
In 2023 the court ruled to keep the child's name secret in the best interests of the child.
It would appear Biden is interested in the best interests of the child while you are determined to abuse that child.