Experts baffled by White House invoking Hatch Act to dodge Hunter cocaine question: '

You lied - we both know it.

Lying is what you do.

You have your party - which is all you care about. But you don't have even a shred of integrity.

^^^
IIrony

JPP's biggest lying wife-beating Nazi calling others liars and lacking integrity. :laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:
 
Well stated

I am in another thread where they are mocking that Joe could be 'proud' of Hunter as if the history of his failure makes it wrong for a parent to be proud if that child survives all that disfunction is on the road to recovery.

The same person who claimed how they would have sorted out Hunter much earlier by simply putting their foot down... then says or kicked him out of the house.

So 'it is easy to succeed in these tough parental issues if you just follow our instructions and do X', but if the kid does not succeed 'just kick them out'.

But if instead the kid does not succeed right away and you stand by them as best you can and help them until they do finally come out of it, you are to be mocked for being 'proud' as they would have kicked them out long before and if they die, they die.


No one wants 'easy parenting' advice from right wingers. They are the worst examples to get it from. All empty 'easy' talking points while kicking out kids who do not succeed. And the next day turning and judging others again and telling them how easy their issues are to solve.
 
LOL. You keep bringing up the stockings hung on the mantle. When I grew up, we only put up stockings for those who were going to be there to get in their stockings. It wasn't a crime to not put up a stocking for someone that wasn't going to be there on Christmas.

When did Trump put up any stockings?

So you didn't put up stockings for let's say someone who was in the military or in college? The good point she should have been there for Christmas...;) I guess that rests that case...;)
 
I am in another thread where they are mocking that Joe could be 'proud' of Hunter as if the history of his failure makes it wrong for a parent to be proud if that child survives all that disfunction is on the road to recovery.

The same person who claimed how they would have sorted out Hunter much earlier by simply putting their foot down... then says or kicked him out of the house.

So 'it is easy to succeed in these tough parental issues if you just follow our instructions and do X', but if the kid does not succeed 'just kick them out'.

But if instead the kid does not succeed right away and you stand by them as best you can and help them until they do finally come out of it, you are to be mocked for being 'proud' as they would have kicked them out long before and if they die, they die.


No one wants 'easy parenting' advice from right wingers. They are the worst examples to get it from. All empty 'easy' talking points while kicking out kids who do not succeed. And the next day turning and judging others again and telling them how easy their issues are to solve.

They are desperate
 
But they do deny her.. as he states many times he has six grandchildren... he names them... he brags about them and talks about how much he loves them.. he denies her... there is no excuse.. stop making them for him... and Jill... it's even worse that she doesn't correct the situation...

Can you point us to a time when Biden mentions his 6 grandchildren?
 
LOL. You keep bringing up the stockings hung on the mantle. When I grew up, we only put up stockings for those who were going to be there to get in their stockings. It wasn't a crime to not put up a stocking for someone that wasn't going to be there on Christmas.

When did Trump put up any stockings?

See but that is what TOP does.

In my family stockings too were only for those attending as they held the night before xmas gifts we would open. Everyone got their stocking on xmas eve.

TOP is the person who would visit my family home and see stockings for 15 family members, some kids, some cousins, etc, and assume the kids stocking not up or cousins not up meant we did not like or love them as much.

TOP would have no clue it was because those family members were not attending our home, and thus did not get a stocking hung.

TOP would not GAF about telling others outside our family how we only cared about certain cousins and not others, certain kids and not others based on nothing more than TOPs assumption that any kid or cousin who gets no stocking must be not liked or neglected.


That is why say people like TOP are the worst type of people in a community and i mean that with no hyperbole. They SEE bits of inter family dynamics and assume the rest and are perfectly ok with then sharing their guesses as if factual.

Fine concluding and telling other neighbors, 'oh the neighbors only like their oldest child and not their youngest'. Based on TOPs determination that is what a missing stocking means. TOP needs no facts beyond that. That the youngest might be with other family that xmas holiday and thus no stocking will not deter TOP telling others the parents do not love the youngest like they do the older child. Facts be damned.
 
See but that is what TOP does.

In my family stockings too were only for those attending as they held the night before xmas gifts we would open. Everyone got their stocking on xmas eve.

TOP is the person who would visit my family home and see stockings for 15 family members, some kids, some cousins, etc, and assume the kids stocking not up or cousins not up meant we did not like or love them as much.

TOP would have no clue it was because those family members were not attending our home, and thus did not get a stocking hung.

TOP would not GAF about telling others outside our family how we only cared about certain cousins and not others, certain kids and not others based on nothing more than TOPs assumption that any kid or cousin who gets no stocking must be not liked or neglected.


That is why say people like TOP are the worst type of people in a community and i mean that with no hyperbole. They SEE bits of inter family dynamics and assume the rest and are perfectly ok with then sharing their guesses as if factual.

Fine concluding and telling other neighbors, 'oh the neighbors only like their oldest child and not their youngest'. Based on TOPs determination that is what a missing stocking means. TOP needs no facts beyond that. That the youngest might be with other family that xmas holiday and thus no stocking will not deter TOP telling others the parents do not love the youngest like they do the older child. Facts be damned.

Bottom line.. the Bidens deny there 7th grandchild...
 
So you didn't put up stockings for let's say someone who was in the military or in college? The good point she should have been there for Christmas...;) I guess that rests that case...;)

NO. Our family tradition was that for everyone at the house we drew one name and one name only and you put one gift for that person in their stocking and they would open it xmas eve. It was the only present they got to open the night before xmas.

But yes that would 'rest your case'. You can judge us as wrong for having a different tradition to you. Everyone MUST do it your way or they are bad and do not love their family members who get an empty stocking hung with no one showing up to grab it.

There is only one way for all of us to live life and that is the rights way. IF they do their stockings different, we ALL must or something is wrong.

Indeed nothing 'rests your case' as to how you think and why you judge, more than that.
 
So you didn't put up stockings for let's say someone who was in the military or in college? The good point she should have been there for Christmas...;) I guess that rests that case...;)

I guess if you completely ignore the court rulings and the wishes of the girl's family, then you could make that case. You are too interested in abusing a 4 year old to make political points rather then looking at what is in the best interest of the child.
In 2019, the court ruled to keep the child's name secret in the best interests of the child.
In 2023 the court ruled to keep the child's name secret in the best interests of the child.

It would appear Biden is interested in the best interests of the child while you are determined to abuse that child.
 
Can you point us to a time when Biden mentions his 6 grandchildren?

I've asked him to quote numerous of his claims (Bidens being pushed as Saints, etc) and you get zero back on any of it.

Everything TOP says is a fiction of his mind represented as fact with no attempt to back any of it up. You cannot debate anything with a person like that, as nothing matters to them but their assumptions no matter how empty those are. So just another person for me to add to my ignore as i am happy to debate with any right winger who is willing to defend their position. We can agree to disagree. But you cannot debate with people who just make stuff up whole cloth, offer no defense, and do not care that is completely indefensible BS they are spewing.
 
I guess if you completely ignore the court rulings and the wishes of the girl's family, then you could make that case. You are too interested in abusing a 4 year old to make political points rather then looking at what is in the best interest of the child.
In 2019, the court ruled to keep the child's name secret in the best interests of the child.
In 2023 the court ruled to keep the child's name secret in the best interests of the child.

It would appear Biden is interested in the best interests of the child while you are determined to abuse that child.

Bottom line dividends denied their 7th grandchild... everyone knows her name she knows who her father and Grandparents are... it is clear that the Biden's best interests are not for the child... I blame Hunter more than them though he's the one that ramped all this up... all they had to do was acknowledge her and no one would have said a word... but Joe goes out of his way to be all about the 6...
 
Bottom line.. the Bidens deny there 7th grandchild...

Bottom line. The Bidens are acting in the best interests of the child by keeping the name of the child secret.

The Clerk of the Court shall keep the unredacted version of this Order and all other sealed documents filed in the record of this case in a secure location inaccessible by the public and shall permit no one but the Court, essential members of the Clerk's staff, the parties, or the attorneys of record for the parties from accessing the unredacted copy of this Order. Such action is in the best interest of the child.

Why do you insist in not acting in the best interest of the child?
 
Bottom line dividends denied their 7th grandchild... everyone knows her name she knows who her father and Grandparents are... it is clear that the Biden's best interests are not for the child... I blame Hunter more than them though he's the one that ramped all this up... all they had to do was acknowledge her and no one would have said a word... but Joe goes out of his way to be all about the 6...

Since you know her name, what is it?
 
I guess if you completely ignore the court rulings and the wishes of the girl's family, then you could make that case. You are too interested in abusing a 4 year old to make political points rather then looking at what is in the best interest of the child.
In 2019, the court ruled to keep the child's name secret in the best interests of the child.
In 2023 the court ruled to keep the child's name secret in the best interests of the child.

It would appear Biden is interested in the best interests of the child while you are determined to abuse that child.

None of that matters. TOP knows what it is in the best interest for OTHER families to do and it is what he thinks they should do. That is all that matters.

Just as my family was wrong to have a tradition of using xmas stockings for night before xmas gift opening only and if you were not there, there would be no stocking. TOP has a view that stockings have more symbolic value and any child or cousin left off the mantel was getting a signal they are not loved or valued. Why? Because that is what TOP thinks. Nothing else matters and ALL other families need to follow that.


I grew up very christian. VERY. And the religion is full of people exactly like that. It is why i ultimately rejected the religion entirely. I could not stand people like that. So full of judgment of others and willing to share it and pass it on to others families while they had no clue what was going inside those families. And that ultimately never mattered to them. They just felt a need to judge everything. Ironic since one of the first teachings of scripture is 'judge not lest ye be judged'.
 
Back
Top