Supreme court says racy cannot be a factor for admissions, but status of your father can.
If your parents can donate a huge chunk of money or if granddaddy graduated that can be the only factor.
America's ugly secret: Race is a cover for economic disparity.
I was under the impression, having graduated from one, that private universities could do whatever they wanted.
If not, what makes them private?
Not whatever they want, but certainly more than those run by public money.
34 percent of Harvard students are white. 43 percent of those students are either legacies, children of faculty, kin of donors or a recruited athlete. 75 percent of them would not have gotten in if not for special status (National Bureau of Economic Research).
Supreme court says racy cannot be a factor for admissions, but status of your father can.
If your parents can donate a huge chunk of money or if granddaddy graduated that can be the only factor.
This is partially bullshit. Sure, rich parents can bribe their kids into a college. Parents who are not so rich but connected--Joe Biden and Al Gore sr. to name two--can get their dumbass kids into a good university too. Those universities tolerate such students because they want the money.
On the other hand, using factors other than ability and intellect for the majority of students is a disservice to the student and the university. When race is considered ahead of ability, universities often end up taking students of a particular ethnic background that can't manage the coursework and end up not finishing the degree program. These students might well have succeeded at a lesser university or college so it really is a disservice to take them. Race should not be a factor in admissions any more than gender should be.
This is partially bullshit. Sure, rich parents can bribe their kids into a college. Parents who are not so rich but connected--Joe Biden and Al Gore sr. to name two--can get their dumbass kids into a good university too. Those universities tolerate such students because they want the money.
On the other hand, using factors other than ability and intellect for the majority of students is a disservice to the student and the university. When race is considered ahead of ability, universities often end up taking students of a particular ethnic background that can't manage the coursework and end up not finishing the degree program. These students might well have succeeded at a lesser university or college so it really is a disservice to take them. Race should not be a factor in admissions any more than gender should be.
Where does it state they would not have gotten in? Isn't that like assuming every black person only got in because of AA and none qualified on their own?
I got into Valparaiso by offering to be their token Iowa farm boy......

And Valparaiso got rid of their law program![]()
Supreme court says racy cannot be a factor for admissions, but status of your father can.
If your parents can donate a huge chunk of money or if granddaddy graduated that can be the only factor.
.If someone donates 10 million dollars would you not let their kid in even if not qualified?
That money could be used to help so many students or to buy teaching supplies or to reduce costs of school books, all that good for letting one unqualified student in.
It’s a way of grandfathering in some extra benefits for white people.
Affirmative action is horrible…
Letting those with generational wealth is fine, even though we severely discriminated against groups last generation.
America's ugly secret: Race is a cover for economic disparity.