Greatest Supreme Court Justice of the Modern Age

Thomas didn't always have those views, however — during his Senate hearing ahead of his appointment to the Supreme Court in 1991, the justice staunchly supported affirmative action.

"The effort on the part of Yale during my years there was to reach out and open its doors to minorities whom it felt were qualified," Thomas testified. "I took them at their word on that, and I have advocated that very kind of affirmative action."

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/justice-clarence-thomas-benefitted-affirmative-30355926

The 1964 civil rights act?

Yes, he proved his support today.
 
What is the law that gives everyone a legal right to attend a chosen university? When you find the answer you can defend Thomas' reasoning.


What is the law that demands Der Juden, the whites, sit at the back of the bus?


What you racists refuse to acknowledge is Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights act that PROHIBITS discrimination in education based on race (religion, creed, national origin, or sex).

Will you repeat the well worn lie that Thomas was admitted to Yale in 1965 based on affirmative action laws that would be passed 8 years into the future?
 
But Thomas “was at war with himself” on affirmative action, according to the biography Supreme Discomfort by Kevin Merida and Michael Fletcher.

In 1983, as head of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), he said that affirmative action laws were of “paramount importance” to him. “But for them, God only knows where I would be today,” he said.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/clarence-thomas-long-battle-against-affirmative-action/

Ohh, PBS bullshitting? Be still my heart...
 
Clarence Thomas delivered what is arguably the most profound opinion from the top court since Brown v. Board of Education. In a concurring opinion, Justice Thomas clearly spelled out the issue of racism in college admissions.

The brilliant and learned jurist writes;

{"The solution to our Nation’s racial problems thus cannot come from policies grounded in affirmative action or some other conception of equity, Racialism simply cannot be undone by different or more racialism. Instead, the solution announced in the second founding is incorporated in our Constitution: that we are all equal, and should be treated equally before the law without regard to our race, Only that promise can allow us to look past our differing skin colors."}

Marxist Justice
Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented and seeks to promote racism, but Justice Thomas deftly dismantled her clumsy arguments.

{
Justice Jackson uses her broad observations about statistical relationships between race and select measures of health, wealth, and well-being to label all blacks as victims. Her desire to do so is unfathomable to me. I cannot deny the great accomplishments of black Americans, including those who succeeded despite long odds.Nor do Justice Jackson's statistics regarding a correlation between levels of health, wealth, and well-being between selected racial groups prove anything. Of course, none of those statistics are capable of drawing a direct causal link between race—rather than socioeconomic status or any other factor—and individual outcomes. So Justice Jackson supplies the link herself: the legacy of slavery and the nature of inherited wealth. This, she claims, locks blacks into a seemingly perpetual inferior caste. Such a view is irrational; it is an insult to individual achievement and cancerous to young minds seeking to push through barriers, rather than consign themselves to permanent victimhood.}

Clarence Thomas' Concurring Opinion on Affirmative Action Is Incredible (townhall.com)

scotus-2023-aa.jpg
 
There is no evidence to support your claim.

And you avoid the actual subject. Not that this has anything to do with you over there in Communist China anyway.

No evidence? ROFLMAO.

The entire point of Thomas being nominated was to put a black man on the court to replace Marshall.
Clearly you aren't from around here, are you?

Thomas certainly wasn't a great legal scholar, had never been a federal judge overseeing trials and was only on the Appeals court for about a year.
 
I quoted Thomas himself saying he got into Yale by affirmative action.
Again, you are depending on something your masters told you to post.

Thomas did NOT say he got into Yale by affirmative action, which would be absurd since affirmative action as you describe it did not EXIST when Thomas entered Yale in 1965.

Thomas, as I have already proven, was speaking of the 1964 civil rights bill - that today's action restores.
 
No evidence? ROFLMAO.

The entire point of Thomas being nominated was to put a black man on the court to replace Marshall.
Clearly you aren't from around here, are you?

Thomas certainly wasn't a great legal scholar, had never been a federal judge overseeing trials and was only on the Appeals court for about a year.

Yes, he's uppity and doesn't know his place. But that isn't relevant.

What Justice Thomas wrote is brilliant, both from the perspective of law, and from a societal perspective. He dismantled the foundation for the racism your party promotes.

The Court’s opinion rightly makes clear that Grutter is, for all intents and purposes, overruled. And, it sees the universities’ admissions policies for what they are: rudderless, race-based preferences designed to ensure a particular racial mix in their entering classes. Those policies fly in the face of our colorblind Constitution and our Nation’s equality ideal. In short, they are plainly—and boldly—unconstitutional. See Brown II, 349 U. S., at 298 (noting that the Brown case one year earlier had “declare[d] the fundamental principle that racial discrimination in public education is unconstitutional”).

This guts the institutional racism that is the heart of the democrat party.
 
That masters stuff is childish. Talk like an adult.

Dude, you are clearly not American. We don't spell it "colour" and all the other British spellings you use. China does tend toward British spelling though. Pretty obvious you're a CCP troll. I'm not trying to blow your cover, just pointing out the obvious.
 
Yet Thomas was an affirmative action admission.

was he?......do you say that just because you assume that as a black, he was inferior to white law school applicants?.......do you perhaps have some actual evidence that his scores on the LSAT or his grades were inferior?......after all, he did advance to the SC which makes him one of the top ten jurists of his generation?........
 
Everyone warned that old Good ol Boy Joe, to put more Judges on the Court and as always, THE COWARDLY DEMS BACKED AWAY FROM IT.....Thus far, we have the most corrupt court in US history, led by GOP criminals who have struck down..... Roe v Wade, the Voting Rights Act, Gerrymandering, sent back to the states and now this, AA. WHEN ARE AMERICA MINORITIES GONNA WAKE THE F UP, GET OFF THE BLOGS TALKING ABOUT HOUSEWIVES AND BS OR THOSE NOT PAYING ATTENTION TO WHATS GOING ON WITH THE TRUMP LOONS AND REALIZE, THE TRUMP ERA IS DETERMINED TO GO BACK TO SEGREGATION (ie separating black men from white women) FORCING WOMEN BACK INTO THE HOMES AND IN THE KITCHEN AND BACK ALLEYS AND RECREATING THE DAYS, WHEN WHITE AMERICA WAS RULING US ALL??? And news flash, to all the blacks getting upset over this ruling.....how many years of AA have been established and how many of us with all our darn degree's and education, are still UNDERPAID, INDEBT AND STILL LAST OF THE TOTEM POLE IN THIS COUNTRY REGARDLESS WHEN IT COMES TO ADVANCING??? As a matter of record, most truly successful blacks never attended college and those that have, are second to a white man fresh out of prison on parole looking for the same job....the most who'll be effected by this, ARE ASIAN AND MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS AND WHITE WOMEN

thank goodness no one pays attention to fuckwits like you.......
 
Back
Top