Greatest Supreme Court Justice of the Modern Age

The loss of institutional racism is a huge blow the agenda of you fascists.

Regardless, what Justice Thomas wrote is both brilliant, and irrefutable. All you can do is fling shit from the sidelines.

Uncle Tom that black motherfucker is a corrupt pile of hillbilly shit, with his white Jenny pig wife......that black bastard was a BENEFICIARY OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. A ruling that put that sell out bitch on the courts
 
" {"The solution to our Nation’s racial problems thus cannot come from policies grounded in affirmative action or some other conception of equity, Racialism simply cannot be undone by different or more racialism. Instead, the solution announced in the second founding is incorporated in our Constitution: that we are all equal, and should be treated equally before the law without regard to our race, Only that promise can allow us to look past our differing skin colors."}

Justice Clarence Thomas.

Brilliant.

Let's see anyone refute his impeccable logic.
 
Clarence Thomas delivered what is arguably the most profound opinion from the top court since Brown v. Board of Education. In a concurring opinion, Justice Thomas clearly spelled out the issue of racism in college admissions.

The brilliant and learned jurist writes;

{"The solution to our Nation’s racial problems thus cannot come from policies grounded in affirmative action or some other conception of equity, Racialism simply cannot be undone by different or more racialism. Instead, the solution announced in the second founding is incorporated in our Constitution: that we are all equal, and should be treated equally before the law without regard to our race, Only that promise can allow us to look past our differing skin colors."}

Marxist Justice
Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented and seeks to promote racism, but Justice Thomas deftly dismantled her clumsy arguments.

{
Justice Jackson uses her broad observations about statistical relationships between race and select measures of health, wealth, and well-being to label all blacks as victims. Her desire to do so is unfathomable to me. I cannot deny the great accomplishments of black Americans, including those who succeeded despite long odds.Nor do Justice Jackson's statistics regarding a correlation between levels of health, wealth, and well-being between selected racial groups prove anything. Of course, none of those statistics are capable of drawing a direct causal link between race—rather than socioeconomic status or any other factor—and individual outcomes. So Justice Jackson supplies the link herself: the legacy of slavery and the nature of inherited wealth. This, she claims, locks blacks into a seemingly perpetual inferior caste. Such a view is irrational; it is an insult to individual achievement and cancerous to young minds seeking to push through barriers, rather than consign themselves to permanent victimhood.}

Clarence Thomas' Concurring Opinion on Affirmative Action Is Incredible (townhall.com)

Actually kinda comical, a guy who benefitted from AA on nearly every step of his career is now saying racism doesn’t exist according to the law

What makes the whole decision ludicrous is that they specifically carved out in the decisions exceptions for the military schools, they still have to pursue affirmative action policies.
 


Uncle Tom that black motherfucker is a corrupt pile of hillbilly shit, with his white Jenny pig wife......that black bastard was a BENEFICIARY OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. A ruling that put that sell out bitch on the courts

A feral baboon flinging shit at her betters.

Tell me, you racist cunt, why do you think black people can't compete? Are you claiming black people are stupid and simply not capable of measuring up intellectually?

You have a very low opinion of black people.
 
What is the law that gives everyone a legal right to attend a chosen university? When you find the answer you can defend Thomas' reasoning.

Thomas said no such thing THIS is is reasoning:

{"The solution to our Nation’s racial problems thus cannot come from policies grounded in affirmative action or some other conception of equity, Racialism simply cannot be undone by different or more racialism. Instead, the solution announced in the second founding is incorporated in our Constitution: that we are all equal, and should be treated equally before the law without regard to our race, Only that promise can allow us to look past our differing skin colors."}


Go ahead..refute it....as if.
 


More white mops sucking off of black men and their meat are on welfare more than anybody with they bi babies....google it.....LOLOLOLOLOL

Black people are 12% of the population, whites are 63%. Of course there are more whites on welfare.

BUT the percentage of black people on welfare DWARFS the percentage of whites on welfare. About one third of black people are on some sort of public assistance. For whites it's about 8%. 8% of whites is a greater number than 30% of blacks. But I'm not sure it's something you want to be proud of.
 
Thomas didn't always have those views, however — during his Senate hearing ahead of his appointment to the Supreme Court in 1991, the justice staunchly supported affirmative action.

"The effort on the part of Yale during my years there was to reach out and open its doors to minorities[/B] whom it felt were qualified," Thomas testified. "I took them at their word on that, and I have advocated that very kind of affirmative action."

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/justice-clarence-thomas-benefitted-affirmative-30355926


Bullshit. His academic accomplishments got him in.; his also being black helped Yale.


He did not receive lowered academic standards, like today's affirmiative action admissions.
 
Actually kinda comical, a guy who benefitted from AA on nearly every step of his career is now saying racism doesn’t exist according to the law

What makes the whole decision ludicrous is that they specifically carved out in the decisions exceptions for the military schools, they still have to pursue affirmative action policies.

How did he "benefit from Affirmative Action?" List the law or program present in 1965 that he used?

You fascists tell a lie - and just won't let go - even when it's not just refuted, but proven impossible.

It's your whole big lie thing - you think that if you keep repeating the lie, it will somehow become true.
 
Actually kinda comical, a guy who benefitted from AA on nearly every step of his career is now saying racism doesn’t exist according to the law

What makes the whole decision ludicrous is that they specifically carved out in the decisions exceptions for the military schools, they still have to pursue affirmative action policies.

Actually kinda comical. You telling complete lies again.

Thomas was admitted to Yale due to his grades; there were no lowered academic standards for him, like you and yours keep trying to lie about.


His race was a bonus, not the reason fpr his admission.
 
Pretty sure his 4.0+ GPA had something to do with it,.

There were no "lowered standards" for Thomas, unlike today's affirmative action beneficiaries.

In 1965 the ONLY affirmative action was Title VII, prohibiting racial discrimination in admissions. There were no quotas or set asides. The court yesterday returned us to the standard where racial discrimination in admission is prohibited.
 
Bullshit. His brilliance got him to where he is.


Jackson and Sotomayor, on the other hand...

I don't like the Marxist politics of Jackson. But she is at least smart and well educated.

Sotomayor on the other hand is dumb as a stump. She truly was appointed purely based on her race. She is utterly unqualified to be a judge in a small town, much less on the highest court in the land.
 
Bullshit. His academic accomplishments got him in.; his also being black helped Yale.


He did not receive lowered academic standards, like today's affirmiative action admissions.

Wrong, Thomas even admitted he “was the poster boy for the success of affirmative action” when he moved into the EEOC Chairman position
 
Because he was ALREADY QUALIFIED, academically, unlike today's affirmative action admissions.

BP is a CCP troll, reciting a script. His handlers at the troll farm in China will not allow him to deviate from the script.

The fact is that there was no affirmative action in 1965. Thomas is speaking purely of Yale allowing minority applicants to compete for a spot. At that time, Title VII was referenced as affirmative action.
 
How did he "benefit from Affirmative Action?" List the law or program present in 1965 that he used?

You fascists tell a lie - and just won't let go - even when it's not just refuted, but proven impossible.

It's your whole big lie thing - you think that if you keep repeating the lie, it will somehow become true.

Wrong, he admitted AA got him into Holy Cross and Yale, and AG in Missouri states he hired Thomas coming out of Yale considering AA requirements
 
Back
Top