Biden LGBT Pride party guest goes TOPLESS in White House garden

ExpressLane said:
This will make a great campaign commercial to bring dignity back to the White House.
Click to expand...

Is that a man or a woman in that picture? Careful. Both answers will show your hypocrisy.

If it's a woman than you admit that men can become women.
If it's a man then you are raising a stink over a man taking his shirt off.



.....


Which is it? A man or a woman?
 
ExpressLane said:
Show other pictures of male White House guests going topples. There is a certain amount of decorum that should go with being a White House guest.
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO.. So you are upset that man took their shirt off on the lawn of the White House?
Please.. Do commercials showing your outrage. I can't wait.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Is that a man or a woman in that picture? Careful. Both answers will show your hypocrisy.

If it's a woman than you admit that men can become women.
If it's a man then you are raising a stink over a man taking his shirt off.



.....


Which is it? A man or a woman?
Click to expand...

Don't expect logic, fairness or honesty from Doktor HCQ.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
ROFLMAO.. So you are upset that man took their shirt off on the lawn of the White House?
Please.. Do commercials showing your outrage. I can't wait.
Click to expand...
ROFLMAO I'm upset by the lack of decorum. It would be like the Easter bunny character humping a guest at the Easter egg roll. Not obscene but disgusting nonetheless.
 
ExpressLane said:
ROFLMAO I'm upset by the lack of decorum. It would be like the Easter bunny character humping a guest at the Easter egg roll. Not obscene but disgusting nonetheless.
Click to expand...

Did you feel that way when Pedo Don was in office?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Is that a man or a woman in that picture? Careful. Both answers will show your hypocrisy.

If it's a woman than you admit that men can become women.
If it's a man then you are raising a stink over a man taking his shirt off.



.....


Which is it? A man or a woman?
Click to expand...
Science says a biological male. Who is acting in an undignified manner when he is a guest on my home that Joe Biden now occupies.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
ROFLMAO.. So you are upset that man took their shirt off on the lawn of the White House?
Please.. Do commercials showing your outrage. I can't wait.
Click to expand...
I'm sure lots of people would disapprove of the lack of proper decorum and respect for the people's house. This is EXACTLY why drag shows aren't for kids. If a female took her top off on the White House lawn would you be OK with it? It is legal
 
ExpressLane said:
I'm sure lots of people would disapprove of the lack of proper decorum and respect for the people's house. This is EXACTLY why drag shows aren't for kids.
Click to expand...

Like the assholes who incited 1/6?

69g97s.jpg
 
I was a fan of David Carradine, well I suppose the whole family.

But, anyway, I remember one time David was hosted by Johnny Carson, and when David Carradine came out, he came out with his wife and new infant.

Well, it was only a matter of a few minutes, when his wife just pulled out one of her her teets, and started feeding her new-born baby on the set.

Johnny Carson looked like he shrunk down to a midget size in his seat with one of the strangest embarrassing looks I've ever seen in his face before! He went from green, to red, to purple!

He didn't even know what to say, he just looked at the stage director and producer, and said, "WELL! We'll be back after this brief commercial from one of our sponsors folks"! :laugh:

So, yes, some things happen that are not planned for, and I don't blame Biden or the White House for the unexpected flash, but I do blame the media for not turning their cameras away from the shocking R-Rated shenanigan!
 
Last edited:
ExpressLane said:
I'm sure lots of people would disapprove of the lack of proper decorum and respect for the people's house. This is EXACTLY why drag shows aren't for kids. If a female took her top off on the White House lawn would you be OK with it? It is legal
Click to expand...

Any female who would attend Biden's queer show wouldn't be worth looking at anyway.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I guess Trump has been gone so long you cuntlings can't even remember what his skin color was....
Click to expand...
^^^
Claims to be a Christian. :rofl2:

Yes, his color is as you said, a pale-faced pedophile. He looks sickly without the orange paint. Maybe it's because he didn't snort his Adderall that day?

7p7bn4.jpg
 
Bigdog said:
Nature vs. Nurture, Aryan. Which is it?

Are all homosexuals and all pedophiles "born that way"?
Click to expand...
Mixed. Sexuality is wired very deep into all sexual creatures. There is no gene for it, but there are statistics for both homosexuality and homosexual acts, which are different. Your convicted WSE friends will no doubt engage in homosexual behavior while in prison, but that doesn't make them gay. Those who are straight would prefer women but 10-20 years is a long time.

To some extent, yes. There are studies about birth order on homosexuals. Pedophiles are rarer and more about mental illness like any other rapist.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1719534115
Twenty years ago, Ray Blanchard and Anthony Bogaert demonstrated that the probability of a boy growing up to be gay increases for each older brother born to the same mother, the so-called fraternal birth order (FBO) effect. Their first investigation indicated that each older brother increased the probability of being gay by about 33% (1). This startling phenomenon was confirmed in multiple studies based on independent populations totaling over 10,000 subjects, and a meta-analysis indicated that between 15% and 29% of gay men owe their sexual orientation to this effect (2). Despite this compelling evidence, a mechanism to account for the effect remained elusive...

...The nature–nurture debate still rages in the minds of many scientists and scholars, despite the consensus that these are complementary rather than mutually exclusive explanations....

...The Bogaert et al. (3) report also provides additional support for biological theories of sexual orientation. Note that the FBO effect accounts for only a maximum of 29% of gay males, or possibly a bit more if one assumes that a fraction of the primiparous mothers who had a gay son had unknowingly miscarried male embryos previously (12). Similarly, the other biological mechanisms implicated in the control of sexual orientation, the effects of early steroid hormones, and genetic background, also explain only a fraction of the cases of male homosexuality (6). Whether a unifying theory can be derived from the available experimental evidence thus remains unclear and will require additional investigations.
 
The whole event fits in with brandons handlers and their choice of cabinet picks. I wonder if they bailed out the luggage thief for the party?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top