The Supreme Court has been destroyed — and the perpetrator thinks he's the victim

Uncensored2008 said:
Lying again, huh?

Well, it's the Nazi way.

https://afresearchlab.com/technology/munitions/

For the stupid - that would be you - munitions are things that go "BOOM"
Click to expand...

Again, you are so stupid you keep quoting what munitions are. Yes Munitions do boom. YES munitions are a subsection of Armaments.

If you ask a General going into battle to list all the Armaments he is taking he would include the Munitions unless he is as stupid as you.

Armament Share


...the kind of weapons that armies use when they wage wars. A tank, for example, is an armament.

The word armament is good for describing heavy duty weaponry and the equipment that's associated with it, like bombs, fighter jets, tanks, and assault rifles. It's even more common to use the plural form, armaments. In the seventeenth century, the word was mainly used to mean "naval force equipped for war," and it comes from the Latin root armare, "to arm, or to furnish with weapons."
Click to expand...

Armaments


Armaments are weapons and military equipment belonging to an army or country.
...global efforts to reduce nuclear and other armaments.
...the armaments industry.
Click to expand...

Armament


weapons, explosives, and other military equipment:
Click to expand...


Honestly try to be less stupid. Those are the first definition of armaments and they all include, things that go boom. You will not see a definition ANYWHERE that says 'armaments' are solely guns and thus the right to 'bear arms' was only about guns.

You are desperate to warp the meaning of the word 'armaments' to only include guns as you realize how incredibly stupid it would be to say the 2nd amendment has no restrictions and thus a person can own a nuclear weapon if they want to.
 
The second amendment is depressingly typical of the inartful wording of the entire constitution.

The methods for amending the constitution require a level of consensus that is impossible to even approach in these times, given the stark polarization of the nation.

Thus, if we keep the republic, we keep the constitution.
The constitution defines what we are as a nation.
The nation is thereby constituted of the incoherent ramblings of the founders
and is, of course, in deep shit for it.

There are effective remedies to be found, but they won't be found given the nations timidity
where it comes to the radical solutions required to address our radical problems.
 
Nordberg said:
In your extremely humble opinion. The fact is your opinion should not become law for all . It is not murder according to the law. It is because you believe it?
Click to expand...

The issue you democrats have with the repeal of the unconstitutional Roe law is that you hate democracy.

The idea that the people, the riff raff have a say angers you. Unelected judges should dictate laws.

How DARE the unwashed masses VOTE for what they want laws to be.
 
martin said:
You're right, privacy isn't mentioned, rather like "individual right to bear arms" not being mentioned, i.e., enumerated. The only enumerated recipient of the Second Amendment right: "militias". As I said, this stuff is out of your depth.
Click to expand...

Oh look, a Nazi democrat is lying - another demon got his horns.

The right OF THE PEOPLE shall not be infringed.

Hey, you tossed out a lie, it flopped - but you lied for your Reich - and that's what really matters....
 
QP! said:
Again, you are so stupid you keep quoting what munitions are. Yes Munitions do boom. YES munitions are a subsection of Armaments.

If you ask a General going into battle to list all the Armaments he is taking he would include the Munitions unless he is as stupid as you.








Honestly try to be less stupid. Those are the first definition of armaments and they all include, things that go boom. You will not see a definition ANYWHERE that says 'armaments' are solely guns and thus the right to 'bear arms' was only about guns.

You are desperate to warp the meaning of the word 'armaments' to only include guns as you realize how incredibly stupid it would be to say the 2nd amendment has no restrictions and thus a person can own a nuclear weapon if they want to.
Click to expand...

Arms <> Aramements

You know this, but choose to lie - it's the Nazi way.

Arms: Man portable, individual, and crew-served weapon systems used mainly against personnel and lightly armored or unarmored equipment.

Dumb ass
 
Uncensored2008 said:
The issue you democrats have with the repeal of the unconstitutional Roe law is that you hate democracy.

The idea that the people, the riff raff have a say angers you. Unelected judges should dictate laws.

How DARE the unwashed masses VOTE for what they want laws to be.
Click to expand...

Do you have any idea how nonsensical that was? Actually, Roe gives a woman choice. That is democracy in action. It is you right wing Nazi who want to dictate the laws that govern a woman's body.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
The second amendment is depressingly typical of the inartful wording of the entire constitution.

The methods for amending the constitution require a level of consensus that is impossible to even approach in these times, given the stark polarization of the nation.

Thus, if we keep the republic, we keep the constitution.
The constitution defines what we are as a nation.
The nation is thereby constituted of the incoherent ramblings of the founders
and is, of course, in deep shit for it.

There are effective remedies to be found, but they won't be found given the nations timidity
where it comes to the radical solutions required to address our radical problems.
Click to expand...

If only you could disarm the populace, your Reich would rule with an Iron Fist and no one could mount resistance.

The tyranny you seek is thwarted by the 2nd and an armed populace. That give you a sadz.

Standard Disclaimer: When democrats and their Chinese Communist masters used biological weapons against America (and the world) in 2019, you brought us to our knees and made us extremely vulnerable. 150 million armed civilians couldn't stop the tyranny you imposed with the Wuhan Designer Virus® and the campaign of fear you waged against America.

I think you Nazis blew your wad too soon, I don't think you'll ever be able to pull that trick again. Oh, you may kill millions like you did with this, but the paralyzing fear you created is no likely to ever happen again. You over-played the bio-weapon.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Arms <> Aramements

You know this, but choose to lie - it's the Nazi way.

Arms: Man portable, individual, and crew-served weapon systems used mainly against personnel and lightly armored or unarmored equipment.

Dumb ass
Click to expand...

WAIT... WHAT?


Are you now arguing that 'Arms' =/= 'Armaments'?

That arms is a unique word created in America that only means 'guns'?

Are you so incedibly and deeply stuypid that you are saying the 'Arms Race' the US was in during the Cold war only referred to guns and excluded munitions that go boom, like Nuclear weapons?

...The nuclear arms race was perhaps the most alarming feature of the Cold War competition between the United States and Soviet Union. Over the decades, the two sides signed various arms control agreements as a means to manage their rivalry and limit the risk of nuclear war.
Click to expand...

I mean, OMG, you are hopelessly stupid if you think the American ARMS RACE with the Soviet Union was only about guns and not all the weapons that qualify as 'arms' including and up to nuclear weapons.


Again, ARMS, is a top category that includes all types of weapons including guns and bombs and tanks, etc. That guns have their own definition within that group or that munitions have their own category within that group, or that tanks do, DOES NOT mean they are not ALL 'arms'.
 
The depths of stupidity of the right wingers on this forum is really shocking. I have debated intelligent right wingers at points but that is not what we get here.

The group here fits right in with MTG and Lauren Boebert and might actually lose debates to those two.

I think even MTG and Lauren Boebert would understand Arms is a broad category that INCLUDES guns, bombs and other weapons.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Oh look, a Nazi democrat is lying - another demon got his horns.

The right OF THE PEOPLE shall not be infringed.

Hey, you tossed out a lie, it flopped - but you lied for your Reich - and that's what really matters....
Click to expand...

Does that mean a woman's right to an abortion will not be infringed? Can't mean "right of a fetus". In the 18th Century and in most places still today a fetus wasn't considered a person, nor has the Court's abortion rulings ever recognized a fetus as a person. You might do better in a discussion group for toddlers.
 
martin said:
Does that mean a woman's right to an abortion will not be infringed?
Click to expand...

Let's see the wording in the Constitution?

Oh wait, abortion isn't in the Constitution... I guess killing your baby isn't actually a "right" at all..


Can't mean "right of a fetus". In the 18th Century and in most places still today a fetus wasn't considered a person, nor has the Court's abortion rulings ever recognized a fetus as a person. You might do better in a discussion group for toddlers.
Click to expand...

What the fuck are you yapping about?

In the 18th century, democrats didn't recognize blacks as "a person."

Dehumanizing the victim is a major aspect of those who seek to engage in atrocities. Democrats denied blacks were human, Hitler, and Guno, denied that Jews were human, Stalin denied that Kulaks were human.

You ghouls deny that the unborn are human. Nothing unique, just more monstrous evil.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
If only you could disarm the populace, your Reich would rule with an Iron Fist and no one could mount resistance.

The tyranny you seek is thwarted by the 2nd and an armed populace. That give you a sadz.

Standard Disclaimer: When democrats and their Chinese Communist masters used biological weapons against America (and the world) in 2019, you brought us to our knees and made us extremely vulnerable. 150 million armed civilians couldn't stop the tyranny you imposed with the Wuhan Designer Virus® and the campaign of fear you waged against America.

I think you Nazis blew your wad too soon, I don't think you'll ever be able to pull that trick again. Oh, you may kill millions like you did with this, but the paralyzing fear you created is no likely to ever happen again. You over-played the bio-weapon.
Click to expand...

Nobody of any significance is trying to disarm citizens. Quit lying.
 
Nordberg said:
Do you have any idea how nonsensical that was? Actually, Roe gives a woman choice. That is democracy in action. It is you right wing Nazi who want to dictate the laws that govern a woman's body.
Click to expand...

Got it.

So 7 unelected judges declaring national law is "democracy" but the citizens of 50 states voting is "Nazi" because - Seig Heil.

You put the "holy fuck" in "what a moron.'
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Got it.

So 7 unelected judges declaring national law is "democracy" but the citizens of 50 states voting is "Nazi" because - Seig Heil.

You put the "holy fuck" in "what a moron.'
Click to expand...

You should seek help. Even by your paltry standards that was a really stupid post. I have an idea. Why don't you call everyone who disagrees with you insulting names? You know how that backs your screeds.
 
Nordberg said:
You should seek help. Even by your paltry standards that was a really stupid post. I have an idea. Why don't you call everyone who disagrees with you insulting names? You know how that backs your screeds.
Click to expand...

Yes, you hate democracy and are outraged that the people in the many states are allowed to vote on the issue of abortion. You demand that unelected Judges declare law by fiat. The people can't be trusted to vote on issues.
 
martin said:
A few dozen weirdos plotting the takeover of the country. Probably not what the Founders had in mind. Anyway, if you knew the first thing about Constitutional law you might know "the individual right" to possess a gun was
debated for two hundred years before the Supreme Court took it up in 2008 in the Heller case and held, for the first time, that the Amendment conferred that right.
Click to expand...

you are welcome to come get mine any time you are ready
 
Nordberg said:
We do not need militias. We have a standing army. We could not afford an army after the Revolutionary War. We were very vulnerable. We do not have citizen armies anymore.
Click to expand...

We had the continental army and a militia. The people should always be armed. Ukraine has not let Russia walk all over them yet thanks to the armed citizens. if the Jews had been armed, wow, what a change in their history
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top