The Supreme Court has been destroyed — and the perpetrator thinks he's the victim

christiefan915 said:
Why would there be? At that time abortion was a legal and routine medical procedure, and not considered a crime until "quickening." The founders didn't know people would start going nuts about abortion less than a hundred years in the future.
Click to expand...

Cool lie - bummer it isn't even close to true.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Wrong, retard.

Bumbs, including nuclear bombs, are MUNITIONS, not arms.



I know you're trying to repeat what some leftist site said - but you're not up to the task.

"due process clause of the 14th?"

{[FONT="]All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.}

[/FONT][/COLOR]Wait,

[B][COLOR=#333333][FONT="] nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

[/FONT][/B][FONT="]Abortion deprives the unborn victim of life. So what you're saying is there MUST be judicial review and a death warrant from a judge prior to any abortion.[/FONT]
Click to expand...

Yes, Due Process Clause. You quoted the clause. What you quoted also addresses your expected ignorance on abortion. A fetus does not fit the definition of "person" and a woman's right to an abortion, the Court ruled as inherent in her right of privacy, is pre-established as due process of law by this very clause.

On ongoing problem with you people on questions of Constitutional law is partly your politics and partly your intellectual inability to comprehend what you are talking about.
 
Last edited:
martin said:
Yes, Due Process Clause. You quoted the clause. What you quoted also addresses your expected ignorance on abortion. A fetus does not fit the definition of "person" and a woman's right to an abortion, the Court ruled as inherent in her right of privacy, is pre-established as due process of law by this very clause.

On ongoing problem with you people on questions of Constitutional law is partly your politics and partly your intellectual inability to comprehend the legal reasoning you are talking about.
Click to expand...

Privacy is nowhere mentioned. And you of the fascist left shit all over the right to be secure in our person and papers when you went after Trumps taxes in a fishing attempt to "get Emmanuel Goldstein."

What IS mentioned is nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law which means there must be due process - that is judicial review, prior to depriving the victim of their life in an abortion.

And of course you attempt to dehumanize your intended victim. If we do a DNA test of one of your victims, what species will we find?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
actually you didn't have a choice......balance restored itself........
Click to expand...

And none of us would honestly deny, that if Biden and the Dems, do what Dems do and fix the massive deficit trajectory problems the GOP always gives them, and Trump gets back in, he would not instantly run up the Deficits again to record levels, while pointing at how that juices up the stock market.

We also know none of you here, crying about deficits now would say one bad word about and would instead proclaim it as good.


Republicunts want Dems to pay down the credit cards so they have more room to run them up the next time. There goal is ALWAYS to hand over power with the credit cards on the brink of default, so they can scream at the dems 'we need to pay them down and fix them'. They play the same game every time.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
The fascists not only think abortion is a constitutional right, they think it is the ONLY constitutional right.

Most democrats have never read the Constitution and think it goes like this;

"We hold these truths to be self evident - abortion is sacred above all things, praise Moloch."

democrats are not sentient.
Click to expand...

You are showing your idiocy.

We all have the right to bodily autonomy as a fundamental right.

To have government step in and impose limitations is the tilt to fascism, not the opposite. Fascism is about gov't imposing controls on citizens.

Anyone who supports a 'pro choice' society is not having gov't impose anything on any other person. You believe abortion should not be an option, then don't do it. When you meet your god, he can reward you. You will never be forced to have one.

If others believe abortion should be an option, then stay out of their choice and let them deal with their God and let him judge them. They are not forcing you to have one.


But like the Taliban, religious nuts gonna religious nut. Religious nuts always say 'as soon as i can gain enough political power I will try to use gov't to force you to live your life by my choices'. That is fascist!
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Wrong, retard.

Bombs, including nuclear bombs, are MUNITIONS, not arms.



I know you're trying to repeat what some leftist site said - but you're not up to the task.

"due process clause of the 14th?"

{[FONT=&]All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.}

[/FONT]Wait,

[FONT=&] nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

[/FONT][FONT=&]Abortion deprives the unborn victim of life. So what you're saying is there MUST be judicial review and a death warrant from a judge prior to any abortion.[/FONT]
Click to expand...

Stop being so stupid and just making things up.

Arms, which is just a short form for 'Armaments' has always been defined as all of the tools of war. ALL OF THEM. Munitions are a subsection of 'arms'.




2
armaments [plural] : military weapons that are used to fight a war


cite
Click to expand...
 
You're right, privacy isn't mentioned, rather like "individual right to bear arms" not being mentioned, i.e., enumerated. The only enumerated recipient of the Second Amendment right: "militias". As I said, this stuff is out of your depth.
 
QP! said:
And none of us would honestly deny, that if Biden and the Dems, do what Dems do and fix the massive deficit trajectory problems the GOP always gives them, and Trump gets back in, he would not instantly run up the Deficits again to record levels, while pointing at how that juices up the stock market.

We also know none of you here, crying about deficits now would say one bad word about and would instead proclaim it as good.


Republicunts want Dems to pay down the credit cards so they have more room to run them up the next time. There goal is ALWAYS to hand over power with the credit cards on the brink of default, so they can scream at the dems 'we need to pay them down and fix them'. They play the same game every time.
Click to expand...

everyone who is honest would deny Demmycunts would ever try to fix the left's constant errors.....we want you fucks to pay down the credit cards you've already maxed out before letting you have a new card...cope, my little cuntling......
 
Nordberg said:
In your extremely humble opinion. The fact is your opinion should not become law for all . It is not murder according to the law. It is because you believe it?
Click to expand...

according to the law? when a pregnant woman is killed the assailant is charged with 2 murders. Taking a life anytime is murder, only people with no moral compass would say otherwise. Those same people shit their pants when a dog or cat is killed.
 
martin said:
You're right, privacy isn't mentioned, rather like "individual right to bear arms" not being mentioned, i.e., enumerated. The only enumerated recipient of the Second Amendment right: "militias". As I said, this stuff is out of your depth.
Click to expand...

who do you think makes up militias?
 
Stringfellow Hawk said:
who do you think makes up militias?
Click to expand...

A few dozen weirdos plotting the takeover of the country. Probably not what the Founders had in mind. Anyway, if you knew the first thing about Constitutional law you might know "the individual right" to possess a gun was
debated for two hundred years before the Supreme Court took it up in 2008 in the Heller case and held, for the first time, that the Amendment conferred that right.
 
christiefan915 said:
You support everyone's right to kill with guns at anyplace and anytime.
Click to expand...

Yes, you're a fucking retard.

But as to the holy sacrament of abortion, there is nothing in the Constitution about abortion. Anything not enumerated to the federal government is the domain of the states - BUT you hate democracy - the idea that the people of the states decide for themselves, you want unelected judges to DICTATE law.

WHY do you Nazi democrats love killing the unborn?

Simple, they can't fight back.

democrats prey on the most defenseless members of society.
 
QP! said:
You are showing your idiocy.
Click to expand...

Trust me Herr Himmler - the idiocy I am exposing is from you of the fascist left.

We all have the right to bodily autonomy as a fundamental right.
Click to expand...

Great, feel free to pull your own arms and legs off to bleed to death screaming in agony.

But what you want is to pull the arms and legs off of the most defenseless members of society.

To have government step in and impose limitations is the tilt to fascism, not the opposite. Fascism is about gov't imposing controls on citizens.
Click to expand...

Right, just like laws against you killing your neighbor in their sleep, or poisoning the water supply. Why should you be limited in you lust to kill others?

And no, laws are not "fascism" Herr Nazi.

Anyone who supports a 'pro choice' society is not having gov't impose anything on any other person. You believe abortion should not be an option, then don't do it. When you meet your god, he can reward you. You will never be forced to have one.
Click to expand...

You Nazis are not "pro choice," you're pro-abortion. You hate choice - the idea that parents have a choice in education OUTRAGES you. No, you love abortion and ONLY abortion.

If others believe abortion should be an option, then stay out of their choice and let them deal with their God and let him judge them. They are not forcing you to have one.
Click to expand...

Right, if you don't like spousicide no one is forcing you to murder your wife.

You want to kill the most defenseless members of society and can't see why anyone places limits on your blood lust.


But like the Taliban, religious nuts gonna religious nut. Religious nuts always say 'as soon as i can gain enough political power I will try to use gov't to force you to live your life by my choices'. That is fascist!
Click to expand...

Right, if you can't kill the defenseless, we are the Taliban,

Seig Heil - you Nazi fuck.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top