Greg Abbott working to 'swiftly' pardon Army Sergeant convicted of murder in Black Li

You are continuing to push a complete lie!

He loaded up his gun and deliberately drove into a street crowded with protestors, and was dangerously pushing them with his car, and honking his horn for them to get out of his way, and deliberately shot a man for no reason other than the fact that he was holding a gun- that wasn't even loaded- and never pointed at the murderer.

He had been on his social media site for days before the murder, telling his friends of his intentions to deliberately kill a protestor, and claim self defense.

So he drove to the protest site and carried out his intentions. He was there to kill people he didn't agree with politically.

Don't be a lying Son-Of-A-Bitch! It don't look good on you!
He was working as a Uber driver. He turned on the road and drove 9 to 11 mph came to a complete stop for six seconds while protesters beat on his car and this happened, The guy with leveled arm is pointing a loaded and cocked AK 47 at the driver's window of Perry's car what would you have done. Play him a love song?


Sorry but it is one of those twitter links and it won't coppy on here but google search Jeff Charles, Agent of Chaos and the photo will probably pop up.
 
Last edited:
Greg Abbott working to 'swiftly' pardon Army Sergeant convicted of murder in Black Lives Matter riot
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said Saturday that he intends to seek a pardon for an Army Sergeant recently convicted of murder for shooting a Black Lives Matter protester during an anti-police demonstration in 2020.

"I am working as swiftly as Texas law allows regarding the pardon of Sgt. Perry," the Texas Republican tweeted Saturday along with a statement on how his office will go about a pardon.

Abbott said in his tweet that pardons in Texas must be recommended by the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

"I have made that request and instructed the board to expedite its review," Abbott said.
The governor said he looks forward to signing the pardon as soon as it reaches his desk.

Army Sergeant Daniel Perry was convicted of murder on Friday for shooting and killing a Black Lives Matter protester holding an AK-47 after the gun was raised toward him. The Austin Police Department concluded at the time that Perry acted in self-defense.

Perry, who was stationed at Fort Hood at the time of the shooting, was driving for Uber to make extra money in downtown Austin on the night of July 25, 2020, when he encountered a large crowd of protesters. They were illegally blocking city streets that night, according to police, as protesters in Austin and elsewhere had done during the weeks of rioting.

Among the protesters was 28-year-old Garrett Foster, who was carrying an AK-47. Perry's defense team says that the demonstrators encircled and starting pounding on his vehicle and that Foster raised the firearm at Perry, prompting him to open fire with a handgun he legally carried for self-defense.

"When Garrett Foster pointed his AK-47 at Daniel Perry, Daniel had two tenths of a second to defend himself. He chose to live," Doug O’Connell, an attorney for Perry, told Fox News Digital in a statement last year.

"It may be legal in Texas to carry an assault rifle in downtown Austin. It doesn’t make it a good idea. If you point a firearm at someone, you’re responsible for everything that happens next."

Abbott explained that Texas has one of the "strongest stand your ground" laws in the country that "cannot be "nullified by a jury or a progressive District Attorney." ...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gr...eant-convicted-murder-black-lives-matter-riot
====================================

Austin Texas (sigh) Travis county is the most liberal county in Texas. This is clearly a self defense case. Abbott is doing the right thing. It is a bad idea to point a AK 47 at a car in Texas. It might just be the last thing you ever do. I CC and my goal is to never need to use it. But in the same situation I would do the same thing as Army Sergeant Daniel Perry.

Appears on the right some are really above the law, the guy was convicted in front of jury of his peers, last I knew, that was about as guilty as one could get barring a legitimate legal appeal

Wonder if Ron would be doing the same if it didn’t involve BLM
 
You are continuing to push a complete lie!

He loaded up his gun and deliberately drove to the protest, into a street crowded with protestors, and was dangerously pushing them with his car, and honking his horn for them to get out of his way, and deliberately shot a man for no reason other than the fact that he was holding a gun- that wasn't even loaded- and never pointed at the murderer.

He had been on his social media site for days before the murder, telling his friends of his intentions to deliberately kill a BLM protestor, and claim self defense.

So he drove to the protest site and carried out his intentions. He was there to kill a BLM protestor because he was a RACIST and defender of the cop that killed Floyd, and he let his hate get the best of him.

Don't be a lying Son-Of-A-Bitch! It don't look good on you!
Show me where he said on social media he was there to deliberately kill a protester.
 
you just equated open carry to intimidation?

This is not the end of the story. He left an electronic audit trail indicating he was clearly motivated to get into a shooting - and then claims he turned accidently into the crowd?

I respect the decision of a jury here, and so should you. He got a fair trial
I bet you didn't respect the jury decision in the Rittenhouse case did you?
 
Appears on the right some are really above the law, the guy was convicted in front of jury of his peers, last I knew, that was about as guilty as one could get barring a legitimate legal appeal

Wonder if Ron would be doing the same if it didn’t involve BLM
Ron who?
 
Show me where he said on social media he was there to deliberately kill a protester.

It was all evidence in the trial, and the evidence that refuted his story of self defense!

Look it up yourself, as I already included what you are asking for in a previous post. WHICH YOU TOTALLY IGNORED!

I don't repeat myself, when I have already provided you the PROOF!

What am I, your fucking servant? Guess again LIAR!
 
He was working as a Uber driver. He turned on the road and drove 9 to 11 mph came to a complete stop for six seconds while protesters beat on his car and this happened, The guy with leveled arm is pointing a loaded and cocked AK 47 at the driver's window of Perry's car what would you have done. Play him a love song?


Sorry but it is one of those twitter links and it won't coppy on here but google search Jeff Charles, Agent of Chaos and the photo will probably pop up.

He was an employee for UBER, he was not on an UBER delivery.

No Sir. He drove to the protest site to intentionally shoot someone and claim self-defense- only reason why he drove into that crowd, or was even in the area!
 
yeah, that isn't a fact though. he did not point at anyones head

According to his attorney’s statement, Perry was driving for a ride-share company the night of Foster’s death and did not know a protest was taking place when he drove to the corner of Fourth Street and Congress Avenue. As people beat on his car, Perry said, Foster used the rifle to motion for him to roll his window down. Perry complied because he initially thought Foster was a law enforcement officer, the statement said.

Broden (Austin police detective) wrote that “several witnesses” confirmed that Foster pointed his gun toward Perry first.

https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/us...eeted-about-retaliating-against-demonstrators


Also look at the photo of Foster pointing his locked and loaded AK 47 on this guy's twitter feed .

Jeff Charles, Agent of Chaos�� (google search it and it will come up.


Or you can go here to see the picture Foster is the guy with a beige baseball cap shouldering his AK 47 the car that he is pointing at is Perry's car.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/1207185/garrett-foster-black-lives-matter-protester-footage-austin/
 
Last edited:
According to his attorney’s statement, Perry was driving for a ride-share company the night of Foster’s death and did not know a protest was taking place when he drove to the corner of Fourth Street and Congress Avenue. As people beat on his car, Perry said, Foster used the rifle to motion for him to roll his window down. Perry complied because he initially thought Foster was a law enforcement officer, the statement said.

Broden (Austin police detective) wrote that “several witnesses” confirmed that Foster pointed his gun toward Perry first.

https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/us...eeted-about-retaliating-against-demonstrators


Also look at the photo of Foster pointing his locked and loaded AK 47 on this guy's twitter feed .

Jeff Charles, Agent of Chaos�� (google search it and it will come up.

at his head <> toward Perry

:laugh:

You are one of those type of debaters
 
He was an employee for UBER, he was not on an UBER delivery.

No Sir. He drove to the protest site to intentionally shoot someone and claim self-defense- only reason why he drove into that crowd, or was even in the area!
Now show me where his Tweets said he deliberately wanted to kill someone like you said he said. If you don't post a link of him saying just admit you lied and we can move on.


Uber driver for passengers not food.
 
at his head <> toward Perry

:laugh:

You are one of those type of debaters
How much of a driver's body is typically exposed through a car window. Would you think a shot in that area of the from an AK 47 18 inches away would generally be lethal? Would YOU like to be shot with an AK 47 from 18 inches? :laugh:
 
How much of a driver's body is typically exposed through a car window. Would you think a shot in that area of the from an AK 47 18 inches away would generally be lethal? Would YOU like to be shot with an AK 47 from 18 inches? :laugh:

If I made a mistake and turned down the wrong street and was fastly approaching a crowd of people, I might consider the notion that I was the one scaring them, and not shoot.

The defendant admitted he turned by mistake into the crowd.
 
Foster, who was a 28-year-old white man and an Air Force veteran, had been seen openly carrying an AK-47 rifle at the time, which is legal. There are conflicting accounts as to whether Foster raised the rifle to the driver first — but seconds later Perry, who was also legally armed, shot and killed Foster and fled the area, police said. He called the police and reported what happened, claiming he shot in self defense after Foster aimed his weapon at him. Perry is also a white man.

The case sparked debates over Texas’ “stand your ground” law, which allows people to use deadly force against someone else if they feel they are in danger. But Perry’s social media posts about retaliating against protesters raised questions about the shooter’s state of mind and his self-defense claim.

The “stand your ground” law prohibits an individual from arguing self-defense if they provoked a threat from someone else. Witnesses said that Perry seemed to drive threateningly into the crowd before shots were fired, and his actions seemed intentional.

Perry’s attorneys argued that the shooting was self-defense as Foster approached Perry’s car with an AK-47 rifle. Prosecutors said Perry could have driven away before firing his revolver and witnesses testified that Foster never raised his rifle at Perry.

prosecutors have developed a fuller picture of Perry's intention and possible premeditation by showing the depth of the hatred he harbored for BLM demonstrators protesting police violence in the summer of 2020.

Two months into those protests, on Saturday, July 25, 2020, Perry, a sergeant stationed at Fort Hood and working as a rideshare driver in Austin, accelerated his car into a crowd of protesters at the corner of Fourth Street and Congress Avenue. Garrett Foster, a 28-year-old Air Force veteran openly carrying an AK-47 across his chest, approached the car. The driver's side window opened and Perry shot Foster four times in the chest and abdomen. Perry turned himself in to Austin police seconds later, claiming he'd shot in self-defense after Foster raised the barrel of his gun. Austin Police Department officers questioned Perry and let him go. Garza presented the case to a Travis County grand jury shortly after taking office in 2021. The grand jury indicted Perry for murder and assault.

The testimony confirming Perry's anger toward protesters came on the third day of the trial as prosecutors displayed text messages and social media comments showing that he thought about killing them. "I might have to kill a few people on my way to work, they are rioting outside my apartment complex," Perry wrote to a friend in June of 2020. "I might go to Dallas to shoot looters," he wrote on another occasion. Perry also encouraged violence in a variety of social media posts.

In addition, Perry speculated about how he might get away with such a killing – by claiming self-defense, as he is now doing. Prosecutors presented a Facebook Messenger chat between Perry and a friend, Michael Holcomb, which occurred two weeks before he shot Foster. In it, Perry argued that shooting protesters was legal if it was in self-defense. Holcomb, who was called to the stand, seemed to try to talk Perry down. "Aren't you a CDL holder too?" he asked, referring to the men's licenses to carry concealed handguns. "We went through the same training ... Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot."


None of this seeming premeditation was on display after Perry turned himself in to APD officers. In his recorded 911 call, played on the fourth day of the trial, Perry claimed that he drove into the protesters by mistake after taking a wrong turn. Body-camera video played the next day shows Perry, after being taken into custody, told officers Foster had pointed his gun at him. "I didn't know he was going to aim it at me," Perry says. "I thought he was going to kill me ... I've never been so scared in my life."

This claim – that Foster raised the barrel of his AK-47 – is, of course, Perry's principal defense to escape a murder conviction. It was refuted over and over during the first three days of the trial by witnesses who were near Foster that night. All repeated a version of the same story: They heard squealing tires as a car sped into a group of about 20 protesters. The protesters, some of whom had almost been hit by the car, slapped and kicked it. Garrett Foster strode to the car's side and issued an order to the driver. All of the witnesses insisted that Foster did not raise the barrel of his gun. According to the D.A.'s lead prosecutor, Guillermo Gonzalez, his gun was recovered with the safety still on and no bullet in the chamber.

The courtroom where the trial unfolded is less than a mile from where Foster died. It was packed through the first week with family members and the young people who protested alongside Foster and his fiancée, Whitney Mitchell. Foster's family sits in the front row on the right side of the courtroom. His mother, Sheila, has wept as pictures of her son's dead body are displayed and attorneys reenact his killing. Perry's parents, visibly worried, sit behind him in the front row on the left side of the courtroom. He sits beside his attorneys, Clint Broden and Doug O'Connell, wearing a dark-colored suit, his hair buzzed close, his face dipping down.

On the trial's sixth day, before resting and allowing the defense to begin presenting witnesses, prosecutors played interviews recorded with Perry after his surrender to officers. In these, Perry cries, talks compulsively, and constantly repeats, "I'm sorry." He reacts with something like panic when he learns Foster has died, saying, "Oh my god, oh my god, he's dead, oh my god!" But after being told that he will be released he calms down. By the end of the interviews he's calm enough to attempt a joke, asking, "Do I get to keep the jumpsuit?"

Here is my original comments in this thread, I am quoting myself!

The part you must have overlooked is in BOLD!
 
Back
Top