Very few actually do file such a motion.
NY Penal Code 175.10
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Very few actually do file such a motion.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Can you quote the law for deadlines that says that?
Stephanie Clifford's NDA is the main basis for the alleged crime, what else could the underlying charge be?
QP!
Verified User
Again with this stupidity i owned you on in the other thread.
Bragg will follow NYS law. Trump derps crying saying 'but i demand to know now or it does not exist' will not change that.
At this stage of the proceeding Bragg is under no obligation to present that part of his case. The Trump legal team will request a Bill of Particulars at some point when they feel that detail needs to be presented and that is when the process, as directed by a judge will require it be presented as the trial moves to the next stages.
No amount of tears from you crying 'but i want to see it now' will make Bragg comply when the law does not require it.
QP!
Verified User
hahahaha
Surely you cannot be this stupid. This idea that 'if Bragg won't tell me... then he has nothing' as he follows the law that DOES NOT require he tell us but does require he have the underlying crime is just so laughably dumb. Trump derp level dumb.
Will you bet on this? Ave and signature bet. Your position being BRagg wil never disclose the underlying crime as he does not have one and mine being he will disclose, as per NYS law when it is required?
Are we on? Lets do a 6 month bet.
countryboy
Verified User
Lol. Actually, according to the Constitution, it is required. Not that libs are ever bothered by such things.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
What is required? What part of the Constitution are you talking about?
It is required that someone know what they are being charged with, but that is in the indictment.
QP!
Verified User
If you were really a lawyer you would realize it is not required YET.
And yet you keep saying, because you are stupid, if he has not provided it yet, it means it does not exist.
That is not how the law works. He will do what is required, WHEN it is required on his own timetable.
Stupid people then say 'herr derr, that means he does not have an underlying crime' and that is because, like you, they are stupid.
QP!
Verified User
hahaha so embarrassing stupid, you are.
That you think a D.A, would bring a case and not know what charge he is going to prosecute just shows the depths of your dumb and lack of understanding of the law.
If you were a real lawyer you would know why you are wrong there. Time and again you demonstrate the weakest understanding of the law and legal process despite claiming to be a slumlord lawyer.
Be honest, how much money did you send when moved by Lindey's tears?
Nope. real crimes that Trump and his people committed. A grand jury spent yeasr investigating this and was presented with evidence and testimony. You want the plutocracy. New York hs prosecuted thousands of these cases.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
countryboy
Verified User
It's clear you have no idea what you're talking about. How can the accused prepare a defense if they have no idea what the underlying crime is? Get fucking real dummy.
They told him what the crim is, 175.10.
The law provides ways for him to get more information. The indictment frames the limits of the charge, listing unnecessary information limits the prosecution, that is simply not how it works.
The prosecutor will show him, when and if he asks, what evidence he has that the fraud was intended to hide a crime.
Its called Discovery.
They told the world the crime.... NY penal code 175.15
QP!
Verified User
Bragg is following crystal clear NYS law in terms of disclosure timeline. The one they use on most such trials.
You say '...but...but i want to know why' and then you think there is something wrong if he does not do what you want.
People who think the world revolves around them and their wants are stupid. Bragg will follow NYS law. The Defense will request more detailed info when they are ready and Bragg then will be required to provide it. That is how it works.
Into the Night
Verified User
Into the Night
Verified User
I can't think of any other way to file it either.
Nope. It is completely legal for Trump to contribute any amount without limit to his own campaign. Beyond a certain amount, he can no longer use government provided campaign funds (which he didn't anyway).
Another valid point that is often overlooked by Bragg and these other twits. How the heck can a payment AFTER the election be considered a 'campaign contribution'???? Apparently that doesn't matter to Bragg or any of these other twits.
Since his company logged them, and they were paid to Cohen, I can't see how they were 'falsified'.
Oddly enough, Cohen himself was convicted of perjury and tax evasion. He lied on his personal taxes and lied about his financial information on a personal real estate transaction and loan application, and for violating campaign finance laws (by contributing too much).
Stormy Daniels has also tried this extortion before. When she tried to sue Trump as part of the extortion, she lost in the countersuit and had to pay Trump a substantial amount of money.
Bragg is exposing himself to a malicious prosecution lawsuit. Stormy is exposing herself to a perjury charge if she tries extortion again or tries to be a prosecution witness (she signed an NDA). Cohen as since completed his prison sentence and paid his $50,000 fine and now holds a grudge against Trump, blaming Trump for his own ills.
Meanwhile, it just more of "Get Trump" by hook or by crook, and more "We've Finally Got Him!" chanting. They've been doing it for EIGHT YEARS.
They are scared shitless that Trump will not only get nominated, but will win.
Into the Night
Verified User
For that matter, what falsified business records??
Into the Night
Verified User
WRONG. It is a required part of the indictment AND a required part of the facts and specifications.
You are no lawyer.