Colleges Should Be More Than Just Vocational Schools

[Into the Night]

Nice dodge on the part I bolded for you. I never said people didn't need instructors mentors or guides. Wow this is unnecessarily hard if you just keep changing the subject.

It's one of the ways he tries to dodge his own lies.

 

[Flash]

I do not support communism.

Me, either and I never said I did. That was another made up lie by Into the Night.

 

[Into the Night]

We can disagree

If you want to disagree, you will need to present your philosophy and reasoning for defining 'science'. As part of that, you will have to counter what the current philosophy defining 'science' is.
You will also have to define 'science' so that it has a texture, such as 'hard' or 'soft' AND provide the reasoning behind that definition.
You will also have to define 'science' in such a way as to justify associating it with a degree as part of this.

Let's see your reasoning.

Until then, you are just denying science.

Caution trying to use Bacon's philosophy or any variant of it, as he tried to define 'science' as 'religion' to 'prove' his religion. He wound up with a circular argument fallacy.

Also remember that it is not possible to prove any theory True, not even a theory of science.

 

[Into the Night]

Me, either and I never said I did. That was another made up lie by Into the Night.

Lie. You support communism. You support Pell grants and public schools. You stated your support in your previous posts. Don't try to deny your own posts! Anyone can go back and look at them!

 

[Flash]

Lie. You support communism. You support Pell grants and public schools. You stated your support in your previous posts. Don't try to deny your own posts! Anyone can go back and look at them!

Lie. I said many students go to school on Pell Grants and do not have debt. I never expressed any opinion about them.

Your attendance of communist public schools shows your support of those institutions.

 

[domer76]

Nice dodge on the part I bolded for you. I never said people didn't need instructors mentors or guides. Wow this is unnecessarily hard if you just keep changing the subject.

Yep, you bolded “they MAY accumulate more knowledge”. What part of that confused you?

 

[Flash]

Lie. You support communism. You support Pell grants and public schools. You stated your support in your previous posts. Don't try to deny your own posts! Anyone can go back and look at them!

Here is my post:

"A large number of students get Pell Grants and have no loan debt. But, they learned to appreciate other things they can enjoy after a hard day of flippin' burgers."

Nowhere does it say I support (or oppose) Pell Grants. I can prove my posts. You never support your claims.

 

[BidenPresident]

Lernin is good.

 

[Into the Night]

Lie. I said many students go to school on Pell Grants and do not have debt. I never expressed any opinion about them.

Lie. You DID express an opinion about them. You support communism.

Your attendance of communist public schools shows your support of those institutions.

Non-sequitur fallacy. Attempted proof by assumption. Attempted proof by third term.

 

[Into the Night]

Lernin is good.

Yes it is. Don't need a school to learn, either.

 

[BidenPresident]

Yes it is. Don't need a school to learn, either.

You in particular are very stupid.

 

[Into the Night]

You in particular are very stupid.

...annnnnd back to your usual mindless chant.

 

[Flash]

Lie. You DID express an opinion about them. You support communism.

Everybody can read my post and can see I expressed no opinion. You are caught in another lie.

 

[BidenPresident]

...annnnnd back to your usual mindless chant.

Exactly, you worthless troll.

 

[domer76]

Everybody can read my post and can see I expressed no opinion. You are caught in another lie.

That person has serious cognition problems.

 

[Yakuda]

If you want to disagree, you will need to present your philosophy and reasoning for defining 'science'. As part of that, you will have to counter what the current philosophy defining 'science' is.
You will also have to define 'science' so that it has a texture, such as 'hard' or 'soft' AND provide the reasoning behind that definition.
You will also have to define 'science' in such a way as to justify associating it with a degree as part of this.

Let's see your reasoning.

Until then, you are just denying science.

Caution trying to use Bacon's philosophy or any variant of it, as he tried to define 'science' as 'religion' to 'prove' his religion. He wound up with a circular argument fallacy.

Also remember that it is not possible to prove any theory True, not even a theory of science.

You're watching overthinking this friend. Try the decaf man

 

[Yakuda]

Yep, you bolded “they MAY accumulate more knowledge”. What part of that confused you?

Lmfao you said you didn't say it. I can't stand dealing with you retards see sometimes

 

[domer76]

Lmfao you said you didn't say it. I can't stand dealing with you retards see sometimes

You are another with cognition problems. Not as serious as the other delusional sadsack, but substantial, nonetheless.

My advice? Relax and read what WAS written rather than read something into statements that were never made. Avoid the “in other words” bullshit that people try to use on this forum.

 

[Yakuda]

You are another with cognition problems. Not as serious as the other delusional sadsack, but substantial, nonetheless.

My advice? Relax and read what WAS written rather than read something into statements that were never made. Avoid the “in other words” bullshit that people try to use on this forum.

It's not my fault you don't know what you said.

 

[Into the Night]

Everybody can read my post and can see I expressed no opinion. You are caught in another lie.

You did express an opinion liar.