NY Penal Code 175.10

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
“A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.“

Lots of people who have never done criminal law maybe can’t understand what is called barebones pleading. It’s how a charging document such as an indictment is done.

The prosecutor only provides the basic minimum that is required to say the Defendant committed a stated crime. Often no facts other than dates and allegations tracking the statute said to have been violated are provided. Barr actually filed what’s called a speaking indictment which provides a little more information.

The reason prosecutor give such a barebones fact pattern is, one… to give as little information as possible until required to do so, and more importantly two… to allow for as much flexibility as possible. A bare bones indictment gives the prosecutor more wiggle room is new evidence comes to light changing how he plans to go about proving the case and making it easier to file a superseding indictment if new more serious crimes come to light while the case is pending.

Having a very vague indictment gives flexibility.

If, for example, Bragg had listed what crime Trump was trying to commit in filing the fraudulent documents, he would be limited to that crime, even if another easier to prove crime later came to light.

A vague indictment meeting the pleading requirements is good lawyering.
 
you better have more than "good lawyering" to charge a former president. this just adds to the banana republic claims
 
you better have more than "good lawyering" to charge a former president. this just adds to the banana republic claims

What makes you think he doesn’t have more?

We haven’t seen the evidence yet.
 
What makes you think he doesn’t have more?

We haven’t seen the evidence yet.

evidence - LMAO - this is about hiding the charge itself - we know evidence is given later - but "good lawyering" to hide the charge is not very good optics
 
evidence - LMAO - this is about hiding the charge itself - we know evidence is given later - but "good lawyering" to hide the charge is not very good optics

It’s not hiding the charge, the statute he violated is right there.
 
evidence - LMAO - this is about hiding the charge itself - we know evidence is given later - but "good lawyering" to hide the charge is not very good optics

Bragg does not care about optics, that’s not his job.
 
“A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.“

Lots of people who have never done criminal law maybe can’t understand what is called barebones pleading. It’s how a charging document such as an indictment is done.

The prosecutor only provides the basic minimum that is required to say the Defendant committed a stated crime. Often no facts other than dates and allegations tracking the statute said to have been violated are provided. Barr actually filed what’s called a speaking indictment which provides a little more information.

The reason prosecutor give such a barebones fact pattern is, one… to give as little information as possible until required to do so, and more importantly two… to allow for as much flexibility as possible. A bare bones indictment gives the prosecutor more wiggle room is new evidence comes to light changing how he plans to go about proving the case and making it easier to file a superseding indictment if new more serious crimes come to light while the case is pending.

Having a very vague indictment gives flexibility.

If, for example, Bragg had listed what crime Trump was trying to commit in filing the fraudulent documents, he would be limited to that crime, even if another easier to prove crime later came to light.

A vague indictment meeting the pleading requirements is good lawyering.

No, it's proof of a weak case.

And, BTW, do you really think Trump did, and was aware of ANY of these expense records?

Speaking of "ace in the hole".

NO UNDERYLING FELONY BEING COVERED UP, NO CRIME.
 
No, it's proof of a weak case.

And, BTW, do you really think Trump did, and was aware of ANY of these expense records?

Speaking of "ace in the hole".

NO UNDERYLING FELONY BEING COVERED UP, NO CRIME.

You might be right, I haven’t seen the evidence yet.
 
You might be right, I haven’t seen the evidence yet.

No one has = why nearly all ACTUAL legal experts see this prosecution as a bad joke.

Between now and December, I don't think it holds up past the Naming of Particulars...
 
“A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.“

Lots of people who have never done criminal law maybe can’t understand what is called barebones pleading. It’s how a charging document such as an indictment is done.

The prosecutor only provides the basic minimum that is required to say the Defendant committed a stated crime. Often no facts other than dates and allegations tracking the statute said to have been violated are provided. Barr actually filed what’s called a speaking indictment which provides a little more information.

The reason prosecutor give such a barebones fact pattern is, one… to give as little information as possible until required to do so, and more importantly two… to allow for as much flexibility as possible. A bare bones indictment gives the prosecutor more wiggle room is new evidence comes to light changing how he plans to go about proving the case and making it easier to file a superseding indictment if new more serious crimes come to light while the case is pending.

Having a very vague indictment gives flexibility.

If, for example, Bragg had listed what crime Trump was trying to commit in filing the fraudulent documents, he would be limited to that crime, even if another easier to prove crime later came to light.

A vague indictment meeting the pleading requirements is good lawyering.
so, cuntselor.....what is the felony he intended to conceal......
 
Back
Top