Pulic: TESLA WAS NAMED THE CHEAPEST LUXURY CAR BRAND TO MAINTAIN. MAGA WETS PANTIES.

He technically said


A normal EV does not have what the normal complex transmission. It has a barebones transmission that is a lot simpler to build and maintain.

Let me put it like this. Technically, a ICE has a single speed transmission to transmit the power from the multi-speed transmission to the wheels. No mechanic calls that single speed transmission a "transmission." When they say "transmission" they mean only the multi-speed transmission, and nothing else.

A valiant attempt by floridafan to get the conversation back on track (we do tend to wander, don't we! :D).
 
Read the responses from other posters. You're losing this argument, little boy. And you're looking silly doing it.
Also, your refusal to answer my questions only highlights your moronic stance on this subject and the fact that you're just a pathetic troll:

You asked me what transmission does my EV have.
So, tell me, what transmissions do EVs have? Name a couple.
Do you believe Trump won the 2020 election?


Once again, refusal to answer will just continue to prove you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and you're just a pathetic little troll who's desperate for attention.

Oh, and thanks for bumping my thread to the top so others can see what a pathetic troll you are. BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!

Okay. Joe is losing it here. He assumes he 'won' though he didn't, starts pulling out Nights Law again, and now reverts to calling people a 'troll' because they disagreed with him.

Transmissions, regardless of their complexity, rarely give trouble. Joe is STILL trying to make this strawman argument.
 
They have transmissions, but not like ICEs. They do not have to go through gear changes to deliver power. They are very simple. https://www.kia.com/dm/discover-kia...f,transmission regulates the electric motor.” It is not a transmission as we know it.
[/COLOR][/B]

Thanks Nordberg. Florida Fan is just a troll seeking attention. He knows he's lost this argument. He can even name one type of EV transmission. What a MAGA moron.

Nothing like the pat one the back society to use as a 'proof'.
Night's Law strikes again. He doesn't even know what 'MAGA' means!
 
You are truly a little cunt. You said your pretend car had no, repeat no transmission, which of course makes you an ignoramus. As to the "other " posters. they do not exist. THE END, now go and fuck off you lying cunt.

Your surrender is accepted, Florida Fuckface.
Welcome to my IGNORE list, mutherfukker.

Yet another attempt by floridafan to point out what Joe said. As a response, Joe is now going for censorship yet again, using an argument of the Stick fallacy and insult fallacies.
At this point, Joe is no longer discussing the advantages or disadvantages of EVs vs gasoline cars. Like any fundamentalist religious fanatic, he is in full censorship mode. He must 'put away' the 'evil'. Poor ole' Joe has not yet realized that censorship doesn't work! :laugh:
 
True. EVs will improve in time. Battery technology improves every year, providing more range with smaller battery volume. It really is an exciting technology.

Joe has now 'put away' the 'evil' and has gone back to chanting. He apparently never learned that Li-ion batteries provide 3.158A/hr of capacity per mole of lithium. That's just electrochemistry, folks. That number is always the same for Li-ion batteries and cannot change.
 
Maybe he's thinking that some day the batteries will be recyclable and cheaper or something... Not happing with the increased use of fire retardant foam potting in them any time soon...

OIP.kPdW9i0_luisv4USAtHxwgHaEK

That's for damn sure.

This potting is put on there to try to physically 'tie down' the cells so they don't move with the vibration and motion of the car. This actually hurts cooling ability of these batteries as well, since the foam potting acts as a thermal insulator. These batteries are wholly dependent on the liquid coolant now.
In the end, it makes no difference in a minor accident in protecting the packs from damage. It DOES make for more landfill and expense though, since the battery pack must be replaced in such an accident. Since insurance companies just total the car instead, the potting compound is just so much more car junk.

Junkyards don't like EVs. Damaged batteries can spontaneously combust, and you have a junkyard fire! :whoa:
 
In the report, Consumer Reports finds that Tesla is the second-worst brand for reliability overall.
https://www.torquenews.com/1083/sec...lete Consumer Reports reliability%2 0surveys.

Consumer Reports Still Ranks Tesla Reliability 27th Out Of 28
https://insideevs.com/news/549130/consumerreports-tesla-reliability-poor-2021/

Tesla crushed in Consumer Reports reliability rankings despite improvement
https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-placed-bottom-consumer-reports-reliability-rankings/

J.D. Power and Consumer Reports both rank Tesla at the bottom of the pack when reliability is tested. It's reported that Tesla vehicles have an average of 171 mechanical issues per 100 vehicles. For reference, the average number for most automakers hovers around 120 issues per 100 vehicles.
https://www.topspeed.com/tesla-reliability-and-repair-costs-the-true-story/


A shitty "luxury" car that is unreliable and comes off as a cheap product from GM or Chrystler...

Tesla Reports Record Revenue for 2022, With 1.31 Million EVs Sold

Tesla sold more cars and made more money than ever, despite its average transaction price falling. The automaker now turns its attention to software to drive profit.

Tesla's finished 2022 on a tear, bolstered by recent price reductions for its stable of electric sedans and SUVs. The automaker's full-year 2022 earnings statement, released at the close of market Wednesday, revealed it delivered 405,278 electric cars in the fourth quarter -- up from 343,830 deliveries in the previous quarter. This brings Tesla's total deliveries in 2022 to 1.31 million cars, which is a record high for the brand and 40% growth year-over-year, but also just short of its own goal of 1.4 million deliveries.
 
Tesla Reports Record Revenue for 2022, With 1.31 Million EVs Sold

Tesla sold more cars and made more money than ever, despite its average transaction price falling. The automaker now turns its attention to software to drive profit.

Tesla's finished 2022 on a tear, bolstered by recent price reductions for its stable of electric sedans and SUVs. The automaker's full-year 2022 earnings statement, released at the close of market Wednesday, revealed it delivered 405,278 electric cars in the fourth quarter -- up from 343,830 deliveries in the previous quarter. This brings Tesla's total deliveries in 2022 to 1.31 million cars, which is a record high for the brand and 40% growth year-over-year, but also just short of its own goal of 1.4 million deliveries.

Red herring fallacy. What does that have to do with Tesla's shitty quality and unreliability?
 
In the report, Consumer Reports finds that Tesla is the second-worst brand for reliability overall.
https://www.torquenews.com/1083/sec...lete Consumer Reports reliability%2 0surveys.

Consumer Reports Still Ranks Tesla Reliability 27th Out Of 28
https://insideevs.com/news/549130/consumerreports-tesla-reliability-poor-2021/

Tesla crushed in Consumer Reports reliability rankings despite improvement
https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-placed-bottom-consumer-reports-reliability-rankings/

J.D. Power and Consumer Reports both rank Tesla at the bottom of the pack when reliability is tested. It's reported that Tesla vehicles have an average of 171 mechanical issues per 100 vehicles. For reference, the average number for most automakers hovers around 120 issues per 100 vehicles.
https://www.topspeed.com/tesla-reliability-and-repair-costs-the-true-story/


A shitty "luxury" car that is unreliable and comes off as a cheap product from GM or Chrystler...

Tesla cars are known for the sparse interiors and cheap fastener problems with them. It's worse than a lot of Ford, GM, or Chrysler gasoline cars.
Most cars are using plastic interiors now, since they can be attractively arranged to cover the frame and metal body parts, but also because they ARE cheap to mold and color. Producing an attractive interior at a low cost, they aren't that bad, PROVIDED they are properly fastened. Tesla has real problems with this.
 
That's for damn sure.

This potting is put on there to try to physically 'tie down' the cells so they don't move with the vibration and motion of the car. This actually hurts cooling ability of these batteries as well, since the foam potting acts as a thermal insulator. These batteries are wholly dependent on the liquid coolant now.
In the end, it makes no difference in a minor accident in protecting the packs from damage. It DOES make for more landfill and expense though, since the battery pack must be replaced in such an accident. Since insurance companies just total the car instead, the potting compound is just so much more car junk.

Junkyards don't like EVs. Damaged batteries can spontaneously combust, and you have a junkyard fire! :whoa:

The batteries were always dependent on liquid cooling. What the foam does is provide an additional layer of fire suppression if the pack catches fire. As a closed cell foam, it also will provide better temperature control overall. I'm not going to fault Tesla for trying to make their battery packs safer. I will fault them for making them unrecyclable.
 
Tesla cars are known for the sparse interiors and cheap fastener problems with them. It's worse than a lot of Ford, GM, or Chrysler gasoline cars.
Most cars are using plastic interiors now, since they can be attractively arranged to cover the frame and metal body parts, but also because they ARE cheap to mold and color. Producing an attractive interior at a low cost, they aren't that bad, PROVIDED they are properly fastened. Tesla has real problems with this.

But Tesla sells at luxury car prices. Delivering the interior of a low-end car like a Ford EcoSport, or a Chevy Malibu, isn't what you pay $50 or $60,000 for. You pay $25,000 for that cheap crap.
 
The batteries were always dependent on liquid cooling. What the foam does is provide an additional layer of fire suppression if the pack catches fire. As a closed cell foam, it also will provide better temperature control overall. I'm not going to fault Tesla for trying to make their battery packs safer. I will fault them for making them unrecyclable.

Yes they were. Before the foam potting, however, the batteries were also air cooled (using undercarriage air). Cooling these suckers is important, as thermal runaway is a real problem with these batteries.
The foam does nothing in case of a fire. It's just more fuel to burn (and produces a nasty soot in the process!).
The foam does marginally make the battery packs safer by providing a cushioning effect similar to the packing material in boxes that are shipped.
It does not protect the battery back in case of a minor accident.
 
Yes they were. Before the foam potting, however, the batteries were also air cooled (using undercarriage air). Cooling these suckers is important, as thermal runaway is a real problem with these batteries.
The foam does nothing in case of a fire. It's just more fuel to burn (and produces a nasty soot in the process!).
The foam does marginally make the battery packs safer by providing a cushioning effect similar to the packing material in boxes that are shipped.
It does not protect the battery back in case of a minor accident.

The foam is engineered as a fire retardant.

Tesla Model 3 Battery Cells & Pack Resist Fire In Crash
https://insideevs.com/news/363109/t...,battery pack and destroyed some of the cells.

I can understand why Tesla chose this route. Foam potting the battery pack is quick and cheap. It provides an additional level of fire suppression safety. Recycling isn't high on their list of priorities so it doesn't matter if the pack is totally unrecyclable.
 
But Tesla sells at luxury car prices. Delivering the interior of a low-end car like a Ford EcoSport, or a Chevy Malibu, isn't what you pay $50 or $60,000 for. You pay $25,000 for that cheap crap.

A fair question. Frankly, I've found the Ford EcoSport or Chevy Malibu to have an interior that is better fastened and just better built. Like I said, most every car (including luxury cars) have a lot of plastic in the interior. It's not a problem, so long as it is properly fit and fastened. Tesla is really sloppy at this, and their fastening methods are poor.

Indeed, plastic itself is absolutely necessary for any car, or for most any electrical wiring (Romex and wire insulation is all plastic now). There are plastic utility boxes commonly used in new construction. Lighting fixtures are often LEDs now, using plastics.
Even the computer you are using right now couldn't exist without plastic.

Most every sensor on a car has a plastic housing, and even the computer that runs the car would be useless without plastic.

That 'cheap crap' make it all work.
 
The foam is engineered as a fire retardant.

Tesla Model 3 Battery Cells & Pack Resist Fire In Crash
https://insideevs.com/news/363109/t...,battery pack and destroyed some of the cells.

I can understand why Tesla chose this route. Foam potting the battery pack is quick and cheap. It provides an additional level of fire suppression safety. Recycling isn't high on their list of priorities so it doesn't matter if the pack is totally unrecyclable.

The sustainability of EV's to include managing the entire life cycle of an EV has to be in the mix of cares for apostles of EV's.
 
The sustainability of EV's to include managing the entire life cycle of an EV has to be in the mix of cares for apostles of EV's.

For them, only when it meshes with their political goals. Otherwise, it doesn't matter, and they could give a flying fuck.
 
For them, only when it meshes with their political goals. Otherwise, it doesn't matter, and they could give a flying fuck.

I have seen some comments that indicate that Tesla is working on this. There has been so much "The Planet is Dying! Humans caused it!" that they can no longer avoid optimizing the sustainability of EV's.

A little side story:
A daughter got us a three month subscription to Curd Box...which is cheese and stuff to go with it. Even I who does not go much in for planet health alarmism am put off by the packaging to payload ratio.....this is just stupid...all of this waste for so little cheese.
 
I have seen some comments that indicate that Tesla is working on this. There has been so much "The Planet is Dying! Humans caused it!" that they can no longer avoid optimizing the sustainability of EV's.

A little side story:
A daughter got us a three month subscription to Curd Box...which is cheese and stuff to go with it. Even I who does not go much in for planet health alarmism am put off by the packaging to payload ratio.....this is just stupid...all of this waste for so little cheese.

So, you are saying they deliver a 'cheesy' product? :awesome:
 
Back
Top