Without seeing the charges or evidence…

We’ll see what the Grand jury says and if it goes to trial what the verdict is.

The Fake Doc is no better at being a Fake Lawyer than he is at being a fake doc. What he said is completely wrong. What a shock. If this is considered a campaign contribution, then it is illegal. Period, full stop. You must declare any contributions you receive, and how you spent them. Trump and Cohen did neither, and that's why Cohen went to prison. Since this was a conspiracy, and Trump was directing it, that means Trump has committed a campaign violation. Federal. Why he wasn't indicted is a mystery, but THAT is the crime. Failing to declare campaign contributions and expenditures. I ran a campaign. You have to report EVERYTHING you get and everything you spend, who donated and who got paid.
 
you libs aren't any different. you all saw the evidence about hillary and her classified email negligence, but you bought the word salad from the FBI that it was just 'careless'............all so you could virtue signal like the brainwashed lemmings you are.

Yes, we are different, because THERE WERE NO CHARGES AGAINST CLINTON. Comey had no business talking about that case. Nor did he have any business announcing that the investigation had been re-opened. That violated every single DOJ policy on handling cases. And it is the main reason we had Donald Trump as President.
 
Yes, we are different, because THERE WERE NO CHARGES AGAINST CLINTON. Comey had no business talking about that case. Nor did he have any business announcing that the investigation had been re-opened. That violated every single DOJ policy on handling cases. And it is the main reason we had Donald Trump as President.

no, linus, you are not any different. i'm sure you need to believe that you are, but you're not. you're as brainwashed about your democrats every bit as much as the trumpys are about him.
 
no, linus, you are not any different. i'm sure you need to believe that you are, but you're not. you're as brainwashed about your democrats every bit as much as the trumpys are about him.

Objectively different. This is not an opinion. One person is going to be charged, the other isn't. I know this is really difficult for your brain to comprehend, but keep working. Maybe I can get you some visual aids.
 
you libs aren't any different. you all saw the evidence about hillary and her classified email negligence, but you bought the word salad from the FBI that it was just 'careless'............all so you could virtue signal like the brainwashed lemmings you are.

I would be happy to see the charges against Hillary and offer an opinion.
 
Objectively different. This is not an opinion. One person is going to be charged, the other isn't. I know this is really difficult for your brain to comprehend, but keep working. Maybe I can get you some visual aids.

maybe you can unstick your blue colored gearshift from your ass. anything you said is irrelevant to what I discussed, which is your willingness to accept word salad in order to declare a member of your preferred party as 'innocent'. The investigation isn't what cost hillary the election, it was the intelligence of the independent voter knowing that the FBI used word salad to exonerate negligence.
 
Without seeing the charges or evidence, how can Republicans not look like fools saying automatically that this is political.

Are they claiming that a former president is automatically above the law?


They have no idea what the evidence shows yet. Hippocrates!

Even more fun is watching the Republicans attempt to shred the Constitution once again by interfering in State legal cases.
 
you libs aren't any different. you all saw the evidence about hillary and her classified email negligence, but you bought the word salad from the FBI that it was just 'careless'............all so you could virtue signal like the brainwashed lemmings you are.

While I agree, it's also whataboutism. Two wrongs never make a right.
 
While I agree, it's also whataboutism. Two wrongs never make a right.

no, and it's something i've also said in the past. I've also warned that the more that either base lets their side get away with will only be escalated by the other side......it's only a matter of which one will push it too far, but then again, I think either side would let their party get away with mass murder if it meant beating their political opponents
 
no, and it's something i've also said in the past. I've also warned that the more that either base lets their side get away with will only be escalated by the other side......it's only a matter of which one will push it too far, but then again, I think either side would let their party get away with mass murder if it meant beating their political opponents
Son, it's clearly whataboutism.

Agreed each side keeps pushing and it appears the Republicans under Trump, pushed it too far.

I have no problem with the FBI shooting terrorists attacking Americans.
 
No charges ever filed. Investigated for decades….

but when she didn't list the costs for that Russian collusion fake information as a campaign expense but identified it as legal expense, didn't she do the exact same thing that they say Trump did?.......
 
They hate the constitution

Unfortunately agreed. Look at how many hate Free Speech, Freedom of Association, Freedom to Peaceably Assemble and Amendments 4, 5, 8, 9 and 10...not to mention the 13th and 14th.
 
Back
Top