Without seeing the charges or evidence, how can Republicans not look like fools saying automatically that this is political.
Are they claiming that a former president is automatically above the law?
They have no idea what the evidence shows yet. Hippocrates!
People do this all the time, and it isn't just politics and it isn't just Trump.
A story breaks on the news about some crime,
and 90% of the people already decide on who's guilty or not
without ever having seen one shred of actual evidence.
They also decide on whether a verdict was correct or not, still not having scene a shred of the evidence that the jury saw.
The only think that I haven't determined is whether this is a serious American character flaw
or whether it's a major flaw in all human character.
With one gruesome exception, my experiences overseas were all recreational and I wasn't ever trying to observe
the unique character of the locals because that's not what I do on holiday. I concentrate on having fun, and I usually succeed.
So I don't know. It's us or it's everybody, but it's definitely us.
I watched just about every minute of the OJ murder trial in--what was it--'94 or thereabouts?
I actually SAW all the evidence because court TV had gavel to gavel coverage, and I watched it ALL because it fascinated me.
Being on the West Coast, it started late and I was able to see it all.
My conclusion, which should have been obvious to anybody with a three digit IQ, is that whether Simpson was guilty or not,
he could NOT be convicted due to all the very obvious Police careless and criminality alike in the handling of evidence.