when cops dont' care about the law

that is the stupidest fucking thing you've EVER stated. it shows you have ZERO clue about how the founders felt about government when they wrote the constitution.

Wrong; the stupidest fucking things posted here come from cop hating morons like you. Dunce.

UNHINGED and TRIGGERED!
:rofl2:
 
I missed doing updates to this story......

the falsely arrested nurse settles for half a million....

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...-for-doing-her-job-reaches-500-000-settlement

the arresting criminal, Jeff Payne, a 27 year police veteran, was fired and then filed a lawsuit against the city and the salt lake city PD........that suit is still pending

The arresting criminals criminal supervisor, LT. James Tracey was demoted back down to patrol officer. He appealed and lost.

https://www.ksl.com/article/4653474...rest-of-university-of-utah-nurse-loses-appeal
 
Not all cops are bad, it's just the bad ones that make the front page (left wing) news. And if it's a white cop, well...
How many good cop stories do you see on the front page (left wing) news? None.
There are good and bad in every occupation. Unfortunately, it's a part of life.
 
It's very important to defend and protect criminals. It makes all of us and our society safer when they are constantly released back into the streets.

so you believe the nurse is a criminal for telling the cops NO and showing them they don't know the law? i'm not surprised. I also am not surprised that your badge blowing attitude renders you unable to comprehend the intent of the US Justice system as envisioned by the founding fathers.......
 
Spoken like a severely mental lunatic. Your mom would be proud. :palm:

the above attitude is extremely prevalent among the low IQ individuals who have surrendered their ability to think for themselves, preferring instead to be told what to do by government agents. It makes their apathetic lives much easier by ignoring their duties as a US Citizen
 
The very best cops are the ones with high IQs who appreciate a good civil service job with generous retirement benefits.
They actually learn how to do their jobs properly.

The ones like the clown above betray an inadequate selection process.
It's basically that simple, and I have inside information on the subject.
 
so you believe the nurse is a criminal for telling the cops NO and showing them they don't know the law? i'm not surprised.

Did I say she was dimwit? :palm:

I also am not surprised that your badge blowing attitude renders you unable to comprehend the intent of the US Justice system as envisioned by the founding fathers.......

I hope you get pulled over some day, pull your gun and declare yourself an independent from the laws of this country while telling the cops what pigs they are. Should be a fascinating outcome.
 
the above attitude is extremely prevalent among the low IQ individuals who have surrendered their ability to think for themselves, preferring instead to be told what to do by government agents. It makes their apathetic lives much easier by ignoring their duties as a US Citizen

It takes an extreme moron to believe that cops are the problem.
 
It takes an extreme moron to believe that cops are the problem.

cops ARE the problem. as are cop unions. city bureaucracies. police chiefs and finally the courts. most of all, the problem is people like you. you're all about holding citizens feet to the fire to toe the line, obey every rule and law out there, but you give an amazingly wide latitude for cops, allowing for most mistakes, then blaming the citizen for any issues because they wouldn't do what they are told.
 
cops ARE the problem. as are cop unions. city bureaucracies. police chiefs and finally the courts. most of all, the problem is people like you. you're all about holding citizens feet to the fire to toe the line, obey every rule and law out there, but you give an amazingly wide latitude for cops, allowing for most mistakes, then blaming the citizen for any issues because they wouldn't do what they are told.

One of your dumber posts.
 
Looks like, to me, there is confusion about the law and the Supreme Courts past decisions on how they have ruled on past cases of drawing blood samples from suspected drunk drivers. Emergency Hospitals have their protocols, but so do police departments, and looks like they are not all on the same page.

In this case, a driver was running from the police, and during a police chase, ended up running head on into the Tractor and being killed in the incident. The Truck Driver's truck caught on fire and the driver was burned rather badly and barely escaped with his life, was ambulanced to the hospital.

Why the Police wanted a blood sample of the Truck Driver, must have been a routine police protocol. But, the Truck Driver was in a comatose condition, as the police were seeking his blood sample. I am not sure that the police seeking a blood sample of the Truck Driver was even based on a probable cause.

But, anyway, after all is said and done. The Police Department ended up paying 500k to the nurse for damages and restitution in the matter for her false arrest. The arrest did appear excessive and unnecessary to me as well.

But because "Probable Cause" is definitely in the text of the law itself, regarding the legality of obtaining a blood sample, this needs to be clarified in the text so that both the police and the Emergency rooms don't have confusion as to what the law is.

I am just saying that the law is confusing and the Supreme Court has not been consistent on past rulings, and has flip-flopped on similar cases. There seems to be no clear-cut precedent for them to be able to rely upon. In every case the Supreme Court has ruled on regarding Blood Tests, has had different probable causes for the test.

Time is if essence when you need an alcohol blood level, as the human body will naturally breath out an ounce of alcohol in the blood every hour- depending on Body Size of course!
 
Last edited:
To sum it up, never ever make a mistake, according to all the 150% perfect people who judge without knowing not even half the story.

Or whom with SCOTUS Rehnquist's Bicentennial Fuhrer's Brainwashing Inquisition Islamidiotocracy of thieving National Archives US Constitution Bill of Rights arsonists where "no one steals & burns US Constitutions in this country" & SCOTUS Rehnquist Fourth Reich July "What is 9/11 ?" asked of 2 Washington, D.C. born USA citizens somehow in the Islamidiotocracy Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate fiefdom drug trafficking enforcement supreme swastika up Uranus kangaroo court fabricated Islam misnomers of the Fuhrer's Brainwashing Inquisition who probably need depends for their "serve the Pope or die" more perfect union with Islam "death to the infidels" .....
 
Back
Top