New Video Footage Could Be Legal Magic for ‘QAnon Shaman’

shut up you stupid asshole

See? Every time you post, you reveal your personality, your disposition, your education level, your maturity, etc, etc, etc. Over time, it adds up to a picture of your personality. It's why I think you have a feminine personality and why I know Perry is either lying about his PhD or, if it's true, that he's suffering from a mental disorder. This is due to the disconnect between what a person claims and how they act.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...ing-sex-differences-in-personality-seriously/
Taking Sex Differences in Personality Seriously
New approaches are shedding light on the magnitude of sex differences in personality, and the results are so strong and pervasive that they can no longer be ignored

...A large number of well done studies have painted a rather consistent picture of sex differences in personality that are strikingly consistent across cultures (see here, here, and here). It turns out that the most pervasive sex differences are seen at the "narrow" level of personality traits, not the "broad" level (see here for a great example of this basic pattern).

At the broad level, we have traits such as extraversion, neuroticism, and agreeableness. But when you look at the specific facets of each of these broad factors, you realize that there are some traits that males score higher on (on average), and some traits that females score higher on (on average), so the differences cancel each other out. This canceling out gives the appearance that sex differences in personality don't exist when in reality they very much do exist.

For instance, males and females on average don't differ much on extraversion. However, at the narrow level, you can see that males on average are more assertive (an aspect of extraversion) whereas females on average are more sociable and friendly (another aspect of extraversion). So what does the overall picture look like for males and females on average when going deeper than the broad level of personality?

On average, males tend to be more dominant, assertive, risk-prone, thrill-seeking, tough-minded, emotionally stable, utilitarian, and open to abstract ideas. Males also tend to score higher on self-estimates of intelligence, even though sex differences in general intelligence measured as an ability are negligible [2]. Men also tend to form larger, competitive groups in which hierarchies tend to be stable and in which individual relationships tend to require little emotional investment. In terms of communication style, males tend to use more assertive speech and are more likely to interrupt people (both men and women) more often-- especially intrusive interruptions-- which can be interpreted as a form of dominant behavior....

68i43l.jpg
 
this is most likely true, but what else do you expect a defense attorney to do when the government breaks the law by not giving them all exculpatory evidence?

Here's how it works.

1. The client explains from the beginning to the ending what happened.
2. The lawyer figures there might be evidence.
3. Requests the court to compel the Jan. 6 to provide them the relevant videos.

See how that works?
 
this is most likely true, but what else do you expect a defense attorney to do when the government breaks the law by not giving them all exculpatory evidence?
I know this is difficult for you to understand, DtM, but an honorable person maintains their innocence even though they know the evidence is against them. Taking a plea deal is a confession to guilt. Same goes for a pardon which is why lawyers advised Trump not to pardon himself or his kids. Accepting a pardon is a confession of guilt.

FWIW, Jake is a nutjob. He belongs in a mental hospital, but Republicans are against putting mentally ill people in an asylum instead of prison. IMO, Jake will come out of prison worse than he went in. Sad.
 
Here's how it works.

1. The client explains from the beginning to the ending what happened.
2. The lawyer figures there might be evidence.
3. Requests the court to compel the Jan. 6 to provide them the relevant videos.

See how that works?

thank you. you have given us all info we are supposed to know, however, what you have failed to acknowledge is that the government HIDES knowledge of that evidence and then, IF caught, simply say it was a mistake and move on.

see how that works?
 
I know this is difficult for you to understand, DtM, but an honorable person maintains their innocence even though they know the evidence is against them. Taking a plea deal is a confession to guilt. Same goes for a pardon which is why lawyers advised Trump not to pardon himself or his kids. Accepting a pardon is a confession of guilt.

FWIW, Jake is a nutjob. He belongs in a mental hospital, but Republicans are against putting mentally ill people in an asylum instead of prison. IMO, Jake will come out of prison worse than he went in. Sad.

this is something that stupid people say because they are ignorant of how the injustice system works. It's why we see many cases of convicted people being found innocent later, sometimes 50 years later.

It's easy to monday morning QB in scenarios you're not facing, but when someone is facing the possibility of 30 years in prison and the prosecutor offers 6 years for a guilty plea, people with no means to fight it, accept it.

and what would you know about 'honor' anyway?
 
thank you. you have given us all info we are supposed to know, however, what you have failed to acknowledge is that the government HIDES knowledge of that evidence and then, IF caught, simply say it was a mistake and move on.

see how that works?

How the fuck would the prosecutor know?

Again, a competent lawyer will figure there's evidence after hearing his story and request it. Since nobody asked for that, how the fuck was the cmte supposed to know?
 
this is something that stupid people say because they are ignorant of how the injustice system works. It's why we see many cases of convicted people being found innocent later, sometimes 50 years later.

It's easy to monday morning QB in scenarios you're not facing, but when someone is facing the possibility of 30 years in prison and the prosecutor offers 6 years for a guilty plea, people with no means to fight it, accept it.

and what would you know about 'honor' anyway?

DtM, you and I both know the only reason this upsets you so much is because you know you are guilty of supporting treason, sedition and mass murder of Americans.
 
So you concede?

His lawyer is terrible if true.

It doesn't help that 1) Jake is mentally ill and 2) Republicans have shattered the US mental healthcare system and put mentally ill people in prison with the criminals.
 
Cite evidence for that.


‘It’s Appalling’: QAnon Shaman’s Lawyer Says DOJ Lied, Withheld Videos Aired By Carlson
https://www.cf.org/news/its-appalli...ys-doj-lied-withheld-videos-aired-by-carlson/

An attorney for the so-called “QAnon Shaman” Jacob Chansley asked federal prosecutors repeatedly for all videos showing his client inside the Capitol on Jan. 6, yet told The Daily Wire he never received the bombshell – and potentially exculpatory – footage aired Monday night by Tucker Carlson.

Albert Watkins, whose client Jacob Chansley pleaded guilty to felony charges in connection with the Capitol riot and was sentenced to 41 months in prison, said Department of Justice prosecutors were legally bound to turn over the footage. Clips shown on Carlson’s Fox News Channel program show Chansley walking freely and peaceably through the building, often accompanied by multiple police officers.


Did the “QAnon Shaman” Get Shafted on Sentencing? New Footage Raises Questions Over the Chansley Case
https://jonathanturley.org/2023/03/...ce-raises-new-questions-on-the-chansley-case/

‘It’s Appalling’: QAnon Shaman’s Lawyer Says DOJ Lied, Withheld Videos Aired By Carlson
https://www.allsides.com/news/2023-...-qanon-shaman-s-lawyer-says-doj-lied-withheld
 
‘It’s Appalling’: QAnon Shaman’s Lawyer Says DOJ Lied, Withheld Videos Aired By Carlson
https://www.cf.org/news/its-appalli...ys-doj-lied-withheld-videos-aired-by-carlson/

An attorney for the so-called “QAnon Shaman” Jacob Chansley asked federal prosecutors repeatedly for all videos showing his client inside the Capitol on Jan. 6, yet told The Daily Wire he never received the bombshell – and potentially exculpatory – footage aired Monday night by Tucker Carlson.

Albert Watkins, whose client Jacob Chansley pleaded guilty to felony charges in connection with the Capitol riot and was sentenced to 41 months in prison, said Department of Justice prosecutors were legally bound to turn over the footage. Clips shown on Carlson’s Fox News Channel program show Chansley walking freely and peaceably through the building, often accompanied by multiple police officers.


Did the “QAnon Shaman” Get Shafted on Sentencing? New Footage Raises Questions Over the Chansley Case
https://jonathanturley.org/2023/03/...ce-raises-new-questions-on-the-chansley-case/

‘It’s Appalling’: QAnon Shaman’s Lawyer Says DOJ Lied, Withheld Videos Aired By Carlson
https://www.allsides.com/news/2023-...-qanon-shaman-s-lawyer-says-doj-lied-withheld

His say so, if he even said it, is not evidence.

Besides, the dates are yesterday and today.
 
His say so, if he even said it, is not evidence.

Besides, the dates are yesterday and today.

equivocation-fallacy-l.jpg


Chansley's lawyer saw the footage Carlson played and was interviewed by Carleson yesterday. He stated unequivocally that he never saw it before, and had put into discovery that all video of Chansley inside the Capitol building be made available to him. The US attorneys had access and failed to provide that evidence. That's pretty damning on their part.
 
Back
Top