why didnt the police arrest him while they were leading him around
Why weren't you there taking the tour? Laundry day? Had to wash your hair? Can't leave your own yard?
why didnt the police arrest him while they were leading him around
He pled guilty, vols. Obviously you don't understand what that means.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/defendants/chansley-jacob-anthony
Case Status:
Arrested 1/9/21. Indicted 1/11/21. Arraigned 1/29/21 and pleaded not guilty to all counts.
Plea agreement entered 9/3.
Sentenced 11/17 to 41 months in prison followed by 36 months supervised release, must pay $2,000 restitution.
who cares
Well you're a far left woman, ought to be right up your street!
Why do you right wingers think calling someone a woman is an insult?
Calling you far left is an insult, calling you a woman is a statement of fact.
You know it is a fact I am a woman? I truly am interested in how you know that.
Attorney General Garland, in the wake of the disclosures of footage from government cameras showing the “QAnon Shaman,” Jacob Chansley, being guided through the Capitol by uniformed police on January 6, 2021, has an obligation to bring, if he hasn’t done so already, the evidence to the attention of Chansley’s lawyers and the court.
Either that or a very effeminate man.
You know it is a fact I am a woman? I truly am interested in how you know that.
Again, based on what?
He's been reading my posts. He's not that bright, but he's not completely stupid either. He knows who the smart, sane and educated people are on the forum even if he doesn't want to admit it.![]()
Feminine personality.
He entered peacefully and was escorted around by capital police.
That is not true. They showed him blasting through the door at the head of a crowd many times on TV. Tucker in O'keefing the videos that McCarthy gave him. We knew that is what they were for. We also knew you guys could convince yourselves that Tucker would tell the truth, even though he had admitted lying to you Trumpys over and over since Trump emerged from the swamp.
His best bet is filing on ineffective council. That is, his lawyer was denied access to exculpatory evidence that would destroy the prosecution's case and therefore the trial was a sham and should be tossed out entirely. If it was sufficiently egregious, the case should be tossed with prejudice meaning it can't be retried.
duhhhh lib bad duhhhh