Fucking Republicans

actually, it appears the republicans were acting properly and it was the dems, especially the chair, who were acting improperly by not allowing republicans rebuttal time....the dems were trying to stifle debate by using a unanimous consent requests without giving the repubs rebuttal time....the chair also disallowed female republicans unanimous consent requests to discuss this bill....

amazing what you learn when you don't cherry pick what happened....you have no right to ever say anything about fox news again, this was pure propoganda that lacked basic facts to tell a truthful picture
 
Yurt said:
actually, it appears the republicans were acting properly and it was the dems, especially the chair, who were acting improperly by not allowing republicans rebuttal time....the dems were trying to stifle debate by using a unanimous consent requests without giving the repubs rebuttal time....the chair also disallowed female republicans unanimous consent requests to discuss this bill....

amazing what you learn when you don't cherry pick what happened....you have no right to ever say anything about fox news again, this was pure propoganda that lacked basic facts to tell a truthful picture
Click to expand...

Whatever source you're citing is clearly spinning. My guess: Fox News, WND, RedState, or some other. Maybe WSJ editorial page or IBD.
 
ib1yysguy said:
Whatever source you're citing is clearly spinning. My guess: Fox News, WND, RedState, or some other. Maybe WSJ editorial page or IBD.
Click to expand...

no source at all....it is what factually happened, you obviously didn't watch your full video and you haven't actually seen the entire event....

you purposefully cherry picked what happened and gave a completely biased and untruthful portrayal of what really happened....

hence why all you have is to claim "spinning"....because you know i am right and it shows because you didn't put up the full the video....and you haven't once argued any of the procedures i mentioned, nor have you disputed a single thing i've said
 
and btw....completely laughable you claim i am spinning it when it is you who is in fact spinning and giving incomplete facts as to what actually happened...
 
Yurt said:
no source at all....it is what factually happened, you obviously didn't watch your full video and you haven't actually seen the entire event....

you purposefully cherry picked what happened and gave a completely biased and untruthful portrayal of what really happened....

hence why all you have is to claim "spinning"....because you know i am right and it shows because you didn't put up the full the video....and you haven't once argued any of the procedures i mentioned, nor have you disputed a single thing i've said
Click to expand...

You have to have a source if you're going to claim the guy was violating parliamentary procedures in favor of the Democrats. He wasnt. He was keeping order since the congressional womens caucus had the floor.
 
ib1yysguy said:
You have to have a source if you're going to claim the guy was violating parliamentary procedures in favor of the Democrats. He wasnt. He was keeping order since the congressional womens caucus had the floor.
Click to expand...

lmao....you didn't watch your video did you? you don't even know what a unanimous consent request is do you?

if you actually saw more of the event, you would see that i am right....but you of course tried to dishonestly cut out only the parts of the event that you could spin to your agenda....i saw more of the event over the weekend and your thread is not entirely honest ib1....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top