Pfizer Director Physically Assaults James O'Keefe & Project Veritas Staff

[Dutch Uncle]

There's no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public setting.

That depends. In Texas, it's this: https://guides.sll.texas.gov/recording-laws/audio-recording
"Texas is considered a "one-party consent" state. This means that unless at least one of the parties to a conversation consents, both Texas and federal wiretapping laws make it a crime to record an audio conversation, either in person or over the phone, if the parties have a "reasonable expectation of privacy".

Courts have generally held that there may not be a reasonable expectation of privacy out in public, but the legality of a specific recording will depend on the circumstances. An attorney can advise you on the recording laws and how they may affect a recording you plan to make.

Below you will find links to Texas and federal laws related to audio recordings..."

https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.c...i-record-a-conversation-between-myself-anothe
"The U.S. and the states have their own laws governing the legality of surreptitious recording of oral, telephonic, and other communications. A person's secret taping of a conversation is governed by the laws of the state in which she is making the recording unless the federal law is more protective of privacy....

...The Wiretap Act (as well as each state law governing secret recording of conversations) protects only those communications that the individuals being secretly recorded reasonably expect to be private. Whether one has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a given situation depends upon the context: Was the conversation in a public or private location? Did the individual being recorded treat the subject matter as private? A person who is bragging at a party about cheating a friend in a business deal cannot later object to the introduction of a recording of this admission as evidence in a lawsuit filed by his ex-friend."

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Experts call this style of journalism ethical and ambush journalism.



https://studybay.com/latest-orders/44019/

You will notice that the reporter identifies themselves as a reporter. No one working for the news organization pretended to be someone else or lied to anyone about who they were.

 

[LV426]

There's no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public setting.

Does that include public internet message boards?

Why have a doxxing rule if this is what you really believe? To protect Nazis, apparently.

 

[AProudLefty]

that's not what happened here, but nice try

The staff is the third party.

 

[AProudLefty]

wrong.

Right.

 

[AProudLefty]

There's no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public setting.

There is a reasonable expectation not to have someone listen in to your conversation and recording it.

 

[zymurgy]

Does that include public internet message boards?

Why have a doxxing rule if this is what you really believe? To protect Nazis, apparently.

your words are literally recorded tardo - you have no expectations of privacy here

 

[AProudLefty]

your words are literally recorded tardo - you have no expectations of privacy here

He's talking about doxxing, fucktardo.

 

[zymurgy]

He's talking about doxxing, fucktardo.

Doxxing is seeking out information not shared and sharing it

This is about the things you say in public being public.

If you shit heads post your address, it is going to be preserved

words have meaning retards. time to learn them tardo

 

[LV426]

your words are literally recorded tardo - you have no expectations of privacy here

Then why are there penalties for doxxing people?

If the expectation is no privacy, then why should I get in trouble for doxxing someone here?

 

[LV426]

Doxxing is seeking out information not shared and sharing it

Doesn't fucking matter because according to you, there is no expectation of privacy in public spaces.

And JPP is a public space.

 

[AProudLefty]

Doxxing is seeking out information not shared and sharing it

This is about the things you say in public being public.

If you shit heads post your address, it is going to be preserved

words have meaning retards. time to learn them tardo

Yes this is about being in public. Doesn't change his question about doxxing.

If someone posts a legitimate threat on a message board, the FBI has to get a warrant from a court to find out information about that person.

 

[zymurgy]

Then why are there penalties for doxxing people?

If the expectation is no privacy, then why should I get in trouble for doxxing someone here?

doxxing is a retarded straw man

This is about me recording what you shared in public. doxxing is me searching out what you did not share and sharing it. thanks for proving again you are too fucking retarded to really have a conversation

 

[zymurgy]

Yes this is about being in public. Doesn't change his question about doxxing.

If someone posts a legitimate threat on a message board, the FBI has to get a warrant from a court to find out information about that person.

yes, it does. doxxing is literally the opposite of this. He did not share his address in public.

 

[LV426]

doxxing is a retarded straw man

I'm not convinced you know what "straw man" means in this context.

 

[LV426]

This is about me recording what you shared in public. doxxing is me searching out what you did not share and sharing it. thanks for proving again you are too fucking retarded to really have a conversation

What you said was that there is no expectation of privacy in public spaces, and since JPP is a public space, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, hence doxxing should be A-OK.

Sounds to me like you're scared of people finding out who you actually are...that's why you're making excuses.

 

[AProudLefty]

yes, it does. doxxing is literally the opposite of this. He did not share his address in public.

Well that's true. There is no evidence that Jordon Trishton Walker works at Pfizer.

And of course many people know him so information will likely come out.

 

[LV426]

yes, it does. doxxing is literally the opposite of this. He did not share his address in public.

Doxxing is only possible if the subject inadvertently reveals something about themselves that can lead to a doxxing.

I wouldn't be able to doxx you based on your JPP ID alone...I would need more info like an e-mail or physical address, or for you to say something about yourself that is identifiable (like where you live, where you work, etc.).

Doxxing doesn't occur out of thin air...the subject has to be forthcoming with some information in order for doxxing to happen.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

doxxing is a retarded straw man

This is about me recording what you shared in public. doxxing is me searching out what you did not share and sharing it. thanks for proving again you are too fucking retarded to really have a conversation

You should record everyone you meet then post them on Facebook. Let me know how the court cases go.

 

[zymurgy]

What you said was that there is no expectation of privacy in public spaces, and since JPP is a public space, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, hence doxxing should be A-OK.

Sounds to me like you're scared of people finding out who you actually are...that's why you're making excuses.

I am not going to argue retarded concepts with retards. this is the last reply to why your doxxing comment was something a child would offer and is just sophomoric and stupid

no expectation of privacy does not mean I can post your social security number or bank pin, or naked photos of you that were taken in private because you went grocery shopping in public with clothes on.

the things that are no longer private are what you did while in public. the words you used in public. the outfit you had on in public - you can't expect those to remain private.

so cry away Karen. that is how this works. sorry life and law is so fucking obfuscated for retards