Pfizer Director Physically Assaults James O'Keefe & Project Veritas Staff

rand paul told you about it too.
Rand Paul, like you, have chosen the Dark Side. Your choice.

05319c20-d434-0132-bfb1-0a13eebe068d.jpg
 
How long before someone beats the shit out of James O'Keefe for being a muckraking scumbag?

Maybe if someone spread to Q Anon on Truth Social that Jimmy was really a Jewish pedophile, some nutjob would take him down like the nutjobs on 1/6 took down police?

5ta8xl.gif

Mr. Tiny Penis, How did you feel about Chris Hansen when he ran the To Catch A Predator series?
 
How any leftie can come on here and not defend O'Keefe and applaud him for exposing Pfizer's actions is astounding, and yet we have a couple in this thread trying to rationalize killing people wearing red and another worried about permission and eavesdropping. God help them for they are a very stupid lot.

This story should be headlines all over the world and Pfizer should be in deep kimchee with the house committee. Like, cut all funding period.
 
he was pissed about the harms done to minor attracted persons.

:truestory:

Mr. Tiny Penis gaslights by refusing to respond to direct questions then altering the names and quotes of the questioner, something for which he has served time in the penalty box to the extent that there is a rule named after him.
 
From the 'Reader's Digest' version site:

Ambush journalism
Ambush journalism refers to aggressive tactics practiced by journalists to suddenly confront and question people who otherwise do not wish to speak to a journalist, in places such as homes, vacation spots, hallways, and parking lots. Investigative reporter Steve Weinberg of the Missouri School of Journalism describes "ambush interview" as a loaded shorthand term describing the practice of reporters "catching source unaware, usually in a public place, then acting rudely."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism_genres

The tactic used by a news reporter who intercepts an uncooperative person in an unexpected place, such as a sidewalk or parking lot, in order to put questions to that individual and elicit spur-of-the-moment responses.

https://www.yourdictionary.com/ambush-journalism

It is an actual term used to describe a particular style of journalist approach to a story.

O'Keefe wasn't using ambush journalism. In ambush journalism, they intercept the person, identify as a journalist and then ask questions that are awkward for the person they have ambushed. 60 Minutes did that back in the 70's. They never failed to state who they were and who they worked for.

This raises the question of whether they were actually conducting journalism which is what Veritas has argued in court. Veritas has been sued and lost cases for pretending to be other people and not identifying as journalists. That is not journalism in any sense of the word.
 
O'Keefe wasn't using ambush journalism. In ambush journalism, they intercept the person, identify as a journalist and then ask questions that are awkward for the person they have ambushed. 60 Minutes did that back in the 70's. They never failed to state who they were and who they worked for.

This raises the question of whether they were actually conducting journalism which is what Veritas has argued in court. Veritas has been sued and lost cases for pretending to be other people and not identifying as journalists. That is not journalism in any sense of the word.

Agreed Veritas is not journalism...or truth. Note the irony. LOL

Also agreed this is better resolved in court. It's my understanding of human nature that tells me it's likely someone will put a cap in Jimmy's ass.
 
O'Keefe wasn't using ambush journalism. In ambush journalism, they intercept the person, identify as a journalist and then ask questions that are awkward for the person they have ambushed. 60 Minutes did that back in the 70's. They never failed to state who they were and who they worked for.

This raises the question of whether they were actually conducting journalism which is what Veritas has argued in court. Veritas has been sued and lost cases for pretending to be other people and not identifying as journalists. That is not journalism in any sense of the word.
Experts call this style of journalism ethical and ambush journalism.

AMBUSH JOURNALISM Is this type of ambush journalism ethical? This type of ambush jounalis is ethical since it exposes evil and wrong doings in the society.

Media Ethics - Dateline's "To Catch a Predator"to-catch-a-predator Many of you have probably seen at least one episode of NBC Dateline's "To Catch a Predator." www.youtube.com (Links to an external site.) If you have not, here's my synopsis....NBC Dateline works with an online predator watchdog group called "Perverted Justice" (http://www.perverted-justice.com (Links to an external site.)). Perverted Justice employees pose as young girls and boys (usually 13, 14, or 15 years old) in online chatrooms. The decoys try to get the older men (sometime much older) to meet them in person. The men drive to the decoy's house (sometimes from hundreds of miles away). All of this is caught on tape. Each man is invited in to the home by the decoy and they meet for a brief moment. Then the decoy leaves the room and NBC reporter Chris Hansen enters. Hansen asks the man about why he is at the teenager's home and what he expected from the rendezvous. The men often have seen the show before but still show up. Shortly after the exchange with Hansen, the man usually flees the house and is then arrested outside by the police and charged as a sex offender in that state. 1) Is this type of "ambush journalism" ethical? (Definition of ambush journalism: Ambush journalism refers to aggressive t actics practiced by journalists to suddenly confront with questions people who otherwise do not wish to speak to a journalist.)
https://studybay.com/latest-orders/44019/
 
Last edited:
Back
Top