Absolute bombshell from WaPo this morning

Didn't you know 200K dollars of Russian Facebook ads won an election that Hillary spent over a billion dollars on. Russia always tries to screw around with our election. 200K would not even make a blip on the radar. Hillary paid a Russian millions for disinformation on Trump.

So since Russia was going to try to screw around in our elections anyway, why did Paul Manafort decide to help them out by giving them polling data so they knew which states and which voters to target?

Oh right, you're going to avoid that question just like every other Conservative phony.
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axel_Springer_SE


As of 2021, the Axel Springer SE names "solidarity with the libertarian values of the United States of America" as one of its core principles on its own website.[40] Many scholars and independent observers allege a "subservience to American geopolitical interests" of the publishing house and its subsidiaries to this day.[38][41][42][43][44] According to Foreign Policy, Axel Springer SE "has a decades-long record of bending journalistic ethics for right-wing causes."[45]
 
FmCZlI0X0AIGZYZ



https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...lls-twitter-had-little-influence-2016-voters/





It’s trash



Trust the FBI over these ass droppings
 
Didn't you know 200K dollars of Russian Facebook ads won an election that Hillary spent over a billion dollars on. Russia always tries to screw around with our election. 200K would not even make a blip on the radar. Hillary paid a Russian millions for disinformation on Trump.

Link
 
And they will avoid it on this thread, despite the fact that I don't block anyone and they can read it.

Manafort handed polling data to Russians because he knew they would use it to interfere in the election, particularly in those upper midwest states that were targeted by Russia on Facebook.
:rofl2:

The two candidates and their campaigns spent a combined $81 million on ads, according to Facebook General Counsel Colin Stretch, who unveiled the number during a congressional hearing Wednesday focused on Russia’s attempt to use social platforms to interfere in the election. Facebook made about $28 billion in revenue in 2016, most of it from advertising.

The $81 million number was brought up in comparison to how much money was spent by accounts with Kremlin ties. Facebook claims that Russian-backed accounts spent approximately $100,000 on about 3,000 Facebook ads intended to spread misinformation. (Here are a few examples of those ads.)

Facebook found some $100,000 in ad spending from June 2015 through May 2017 connected to about 470 accounts that were deemed as inauthentic and in violation of its internal guidelines. These accounts – associated with about 3,000 ads – were connected to each other “and likely operated out of Russia,” Alex Stamos, Facebook’s chief security officer, wrote in a Wednesday blog post.

While the “vast majority” of those ads didn’t reference any specific presidential candidate, or even the election itself, Stamos explained that the Russian ads that Facebook uncovered were designed to amplify hot-button social and political issues, such as LGBT rights, race, immigration and gun rights.
https://www.vox.com/2017/11/1/16593...k-advertising-money-election-president-russia
 
Facebook claims that Russian-backed accounts spent approximately $100,000 on about 3,000 Facebook ads intended to spread misinformation.

And it was targeted based on the polling data Russia got from Manafort by way of Kilimnik and Deripaska.

So folks in California were not seeing the Facebook ads folks in Michigan were.

You realize you just provided JPP with the result of Manafort's efforts with your own post, dummy.

Why is every single Conservative so fucking stupid like this?
 
And it was targeted based on the polling data Russia got from Manafort by way of Kilimnik and Deripaska.

So folks in California were not seeing the Facebook ads folks in Michigan were.

You realize you just provided JPP with the result of Manafort's efforts with your own post, dummy.

Why is every single Conservative so fucking stupid like this?
Hillary's bar tab was bigger that 100K :laugh: So you are saying 100k worth of Facebook adds in an election where the Hillary campaign spent over a BILLION dollars? :rofl2: The Facebook ads didn't even support a specific candidate.
 
If there was no Russian collusion, then why did Paul Manafort ask Konstantin Kilimnik to share confidential GOP polling data from the Midwest with Oleg Deripaska?

Not one of you Nazi clowns has been able to answer that question, and every single one of you avoid it at all costs.

Asked it of Matt Taibbi on Twitter and he blocked me with no explanation.

The explanation is you're a retarded leftist donkey dick sucker.
 
Sarcasm is an ironic or satirical remark tempered by humor. Mainly, people use it to say the opposite of what's true to make someone look or feel foolish.

It's impossible to determine when a Trumper is being sarcastic. For example, you claim with a straight face that the 2020 election was stolen. So you'll have to excuse me for missing your point.
 
The explanation is you're a retarded leftist donkey dick sucker.

The level of thought we already know you puke out regularly


We already know you don’t understand anything you offer up



It’s not your fault


Your Siberian programmer is a fucking idiot
 
Hillary's bar tab was bigger that 100K

But Clinton didn't target specific states and voters like Russia did.

Russia only knew what states and voters to target because of the polling data Manafort gave them.

Why did he give them that polling data, otherwise?

What does Konstantin Kilimnik care about polling results from Wisconsin in April 2016?

Again, these are all questions you're too chickenshit to answer.
 
The explanation is you're a retarded leftist donkey dick sucker.

You're just too chickenshit to answer honestly because if you did, then you couldn't blame it on "the Left" that you hate for entirely personal reasons.
 
There is no link in that post
Below your link request idiot :palm:

Are all Democrats as helpless as you?


The two candidates and their campaigns spent a combined $81 million on ads, according to Facebook General Counsel Colin Stretch, who unveiled the number during a congressional hearing Wednesday focused on Russia’s attempt to use social platforms to interfere in the election. Facebook made about $28 billion in revenue in 2016, most of it from advertising.

The $81 million number was brought up in comparison to how much money was spent by accounts with Kremlin ties. Facebook claims that Russian-backed accounts spent approximately $100,000 on about 3,000 Facebook ads intended to spread misinformation. (Here are a few examples of those ads.)

Facebook found some $100,000 in ad spending from June 2015 through May 2017 connected to about 470 accounts that were deemed as inauthentic and in violation of its internal guidelines. These accounts – associated with about 3,000 ads – were connected to each other “and likely operated out of Russia,” Alex Stamos, Facebook’s chief security officer, wrote in a Wednesday blog post.

While the “vast majority” of those ads didn’t reference any specific presidential candidate, or even the election itself, Stamos explained that the Russian ads that Facebook uncovered were designed to amplify hot-button social and political issues, such as LGBT rights, race, immigration and gun rights.
https://www.vox.com/2017/11/1/16593...k-advertising-money-election-president-russia
 
Facebook claims that Russian-backed accounts spent approximately $100,000 on about 3,000 Facebook ads intended to spread misinformation. (Here are a few examples of those ads.)

I'm not sure why you think this link helps your argument at all.

What your link is saying is that unlike Clinton's kitchen-sink approach to Facebook advertising, Russia targeted its ads at specific people and states and they knew which states and which people to target because Manafort gave them all that polling data.

Why would Manafort do that?
 
But Clinton didn't target specific states and voters like Russia did.

Russia only knew what states and voters to target because of the polling data Manafort gave them.

Why did he give them that polling data, otherwise?

What does Konstantin Kilimnik care about polling results from Wisconsin in April 2016?

Again, these are all questions you're too chickenshit to answer.
Hillary should have spent her bar money on Facebook ads then :dunno: Hillary did spend millions on a fake Russian dossier that was Russian produced misinformation.
 
Back
Top