Was Global Warming responsible for the many deaths in freezing-snow packed Buffalo?

Into the Night said:
There is no such thing as 'biomarkers' in oil.
Click to expand...

LOL. You don't know what you are talking about. Moron.

Oil can be synthesized from a carbon oxide and hydrogen in the presence of an iron catalyst under high heat and high pressure.
Conditions that exist naturally underground.
Click to expand...

You don't know how oil is made. Even if someone could make oil per the CO2+H2--> with Fe it wouldn't look like petroleum we get out of the ground. It would be smaller molecules and would lack any of the markers indicative of photosythesis (like porphyrn rings or pristane and phytane).

You really are out of your depth on this one. Seriously just stop. I'm laughing too hard.
 
It's embarrassing that conservatives still bring up the "Ice Age" cover story from the '70s.

It's like, someone was wrong a half a century ago - so let's ignore everything else when it comes to the health of the planet.
 
Libhater said:
Where the Left seems to blame global warming on everything having to do with the deteriorating of America's landscape, our water supply and even the deaths of people caught up in extreme heat conditions (which are few in number), I'm curious as to whether this current deep freeze and deep snow conditions of late up and around the Buffalo N.Y. area that has caused dozens of deaths makes these lefties rethink their assertion that climate change or that global warming is and should be of major concern to we taxpayers going forward by allocating billions of dollars to their Green New Deal and any other illiterate claim that our world is going to end in less than ten years unless we immediately destroy all fossil fuels and wait around decades for some sort of windmill or electric means to save us from this travesty?

You might take note that more people across the world die from cold conditions then they die from warm or hot conditions. Just a fact Jack!


https://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2015/05/20/cold-weather-deaths/27657269/
Click to expand...

Idiots like you pick one day,and try to explain a centuries event!
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
You Said- The problem with the hypothesis is that increase in energy cannot be created from a lesser energy source in violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics and Stefan-Boltzman? BLA! BLA! BLA! WHAT IN THE FUCKING FUCK?

First of all, who in the fuck told you that Global Warming violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics?
Click to expand...
The 2nd law of thermodynamics.
Geeko Sportivo said:
No You Sir! You Show us a report from a reputable Scientific publication that says the idea of Global Warming violates the 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics!
Click to expand...
The 2nd law of thermodynamics.
Geeko Sportivo said:
Don't ask me to do what you didn't do in the first fucking place
Click to expand...
I already did.
Geeko Sportivo said:
We see what the problem is here- YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!
Click to expand...
No, that would be YOU. It is YOU denying this theory, along with several others and several areas of mathematics.
Geeko Sportivo said:
Go ahead and take a minute, and tell us everything you know about the 2nd law of thermodynamics!
Click to expand...
e(t+1) >= e(t), where 'e' is entropy and 't' is time. This law defines the concept of heat, which always flows from hot to cold, NEVER the reverse. No gas or vapor in the cooler atmosphere has the capability to warm the warmer surface. You cannot use a cold object to heat a warmer one.
 
Diesel said:
The problem is global warming, but you idiots don't know the difference between climate and weather and even brought snow into the US Capitol to show that it was cold somewhere. Science doesn't care about your opinions. Your astounding ignorance doesn't make a difference either.
Click to expand...

Did you know is commonly snows in Washington DC in the winter?
No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics. You cannot create energy out of nothing.
 
BartenderElite said:
It's embarrassing that conservatives still bring up the "Ice Age" cover story from the '70s.

It's like, someone was wrong a half a century ago - so let's ignore everything else when it comes to the health of the planet.
Click to expand...

The Experts have been wrong about almost everything all along the trail...there is no reason to expect that anything has changed.
 
I'll keep saying it: this is not a partisan issue. The planet is in trouble. Once it hits a tipping point, none of the other issues we debate will matter, at all.

And anyone who thinks what we're doing is sustainable is truly ignorant.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
The Experts have been wrong about almost everything all along the trail...there is no reason to expect that anything has changed.
Click to expand...

The certainly have NOT been wrong about everything. Most of what we're seeing now was predicted - disappearing habitat, a mass exctinction, the oceanic food supply on the brink.
 
Into the Night said:
e(t+1) >= e(t), where 'e' is entropy and 't' is time. This law defines the concept of heat, which always flows from hot to cold, NEVER the reverse. No gas or vapor in the cooler atmosphere has the capability to warm the warmer surface. You cannot use a cold object to heat a warmer one.
Click to expand...

Can I just say this is the lamest, most stupid form of the Second Law I've EVER seen. LOL. It's almost like you don't have a clue. While it is technically correct it doesn't look like the way ACTUAL SCIENTISTS discuss it.

You keep trying.
 
Nordberg said:
Global warming scientists predicted more extreme weather. It is not just making the globe hotter, but it makes the weather more extreme. That it is happening and should even be obvious to deniers by now.
Click to expand...

A 'global warming scientist' is nothing more than a high priest in the Church of Global Warming. They routinely discard science and mathematics, just like you do.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth. You can't create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
 
Into the Night said:
A 'global warming scientist' is nothing more than a high priest in the Church of Global Warming. They routinely discard science and mathematics, just like you do.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth. You can't create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
Click to expand...

It's not a church. That has to be some sort of fallacy that you keep repeating.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top