Taliban adopts full Sharia law in Afghanistan

I was being sarcastic, you dozy twat! It was in response to a post made by Cypress, you truly are a moron.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...aria-law-in-Afghanistan&p=5367799#post5367799


BULLSHIT!!!

You are no newbie.
You have 100K+ posts.
No way you post that 'sarcastically'...and make ZERO indication of said sarcasm.
Even you aren't THAT stupid.

Plus, you have used what others have typed (often innocently).
And trolled them with it.
Over and over and over and over.
Now...it is your turn to taste your own medicine.



Have a nice day, now.
 
Last edited:
I have not seen any recent reporting but soon after the Taliban retook the nation they said that their policy is that anyone who does not like living in the deWesternized Afghanistan should leave, they are not wanted. Much like Kathy Hochul said to New York citizens and illegals.

They haven't changed in the slightest, banning women from education is their hallmark previously and now. Of course I'll be labelled a misogynist by the Gen Z arsehole McCockit for daring to castigate those lovable good old boys.
 
.
What a surprise, anybody with an ounce of nous knew they would go back to their old habits sooner or later.

Taliban chief spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid tweeted late on Sunday that the 'obligatory' command by Hibatullah Akhundzada came after the secretive leader met with a group of judges.

Afghanistan's supreme leader has ordered judges to fully enforce aspects of Islamic law that include public executions, stonings and floggings, and the amputation of limbs for thieves.

Taliban chief spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid tweeted late on Sunday that the 'obligatory' command by Hibatullah Akhundzada came after the secretive leader met with a group of judges.

Akhundzada, who has not been filmed or photographed in public since the Taliban returned to power in August last year, rules by decree from Kandahar, the movement's birthplace and spiritual heartland.

The Taliban promised a softer version of the harsh rule that characterised their first stint in power, from 1996-2001, but have gradually clamped down on rights and freedoms.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...me-leader-orders-enforcement-Islamic-law.html

So what?
Everyone knew this would happen when the Taliban took over.

What the fuck is your solution?
Have America stay in Afghanistan?
Accomplishing nothing.
Whilst costing taxpayers, hundreds of billions of dollars?
Whilst thousands of brave soldiers get killed?

You seem to be blaming the left/Biden for pulling out.

What is your brilliant solution?



Once again, I DESPISE, both parties.
 
Last edited:
They haven't changed in the slightest, banning women from education is their hallmark previously and now. Of course I'll be labelled a misogynist by the Gen Z arsehole McCockit for daring to castigate those lovable good old boys.

Says the man who posted the following:

'Yeh fuck brown people I'm only concerned about white people in Ukraine.'

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...aria-law-in-Afghanistan&p=5367799#post5367799

But..over a month later?
Now claims he was 'being sarcastic'.

Suuuure.
After all.
You show such decency and compassion for women/many races/religions/political preferences.
:rolleyes:
 
They haven't changed in the slightest, banning women from education is their hallmark previously and now. Of course I'll be labelled a misogynist by the Gen Z arsehole McCockit for daring to castigate those lovable good old boys.

What the actual fuck?
 
Man you're a truly dopey cunt, and that's not being sarcastic.

Blah, blah, blah.

Now answer the fucking question...you racist, misogynistic, British monarchist loser?
You started the fucking thread.
Now answer a question about it...coward.

Though I doubt you even have an answer.

'What the fuck is your solution?
Have America stay in Afghanistan?
Accomplishing nothing.
Whilst costing taxpayers, hundreds of billions of dollars?
Whilst thousands of brave soldiers get killed?

You seem to be blaming the left/Biden for pulling out.

What is your brilliant solution?'
 
Last edited:
Says the man who posted the following:

'Yeh fuck brown people I'm only concerned about white people in Ukraine.'

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...aria-law-in-Afghanistan&p=5367799#post5367799

But..over a month later?
Now claims he was 'being sarcastic'.

Suuuure.
After all.
You show such decency and compassion for women/many races/religions/political preferences.
:rolleyes:

Most English people are brought up on sarcasm and irony, naturally a Septic like you can only operate on a literal level.
 
Blah, blah, blah.

Now answer the fucking question...you racist, misogynistic, British monarchist loser?
You started the fucking thread.
Now answer a question about it...coward.

Though I doubt you even have an answer.

'What the fuck is your solution?
Have America stay in Afghanistan?
Accomplishing nothing.
Whilst costing taxpayers, hundreds of billions of dollars?
Whilst thousands of brave soldiers get killed?

You seem to be blaming the left/Biden for pulling out.

What is your brilliant solution?'

Lick my balls, soy boy!!
 
In the U.S. and around the ...https://www.pewresearch.org › ... › Religion › Religions
Aug 9, 2017 — Nearly all Muslims in Afghanistan (99%) and most in Iraq (91%) and Pakistan (84%) support sharia law as official law.

Insanity but it’s what these people want.
 
Shariah is Anti-Constitutional
Whether pursued through the violent form of jihad (holy war) or stealthier practices that shariah Islamists often refer to as "dawa" (the "call to Islam"), shariah rejects fundamental premises of American society and values:

the bedrock proposition that the governed have a right to make law for themselves;

the democratic republic governed by the Constitution;

freedom of conscience; individual liberty

freedom of expression (including the liberty to analyze and criticize shariah);

economic liberty (including private property);

equal treatment under the law (including that of men and women, and of Muslims and non-Muslims);

freedom from cruel and unusual punishments; an unequivocal condemnation of terrorism (i.e., one that is based on a common sense meaning of the term and does not rationalize barbarity as legitimate "resistance"); and

an abiding commitment to deflate and resolve political controversies by the ordinary mechanisms of our democratic republic, not wanton violence. The subversion campaign known as "civilization jihad" must not be confused with, or tolerated as, a constitutionally protected form of religious practice. Its ambitions transcend what American law recognizes as the sacrosanct realm of private conscience and belief. It seeks to supplant our Constitution with its own totalitarian framework.
nccs.net
 
Back
Top