Trumppers… huge win for Walker?

[LV426]

No they didn't...

Then what is this:


9 requiring that a
10 student's school or institution, as applicable,
11 resolve disputes regarding the student's sex;
12 requiring the school or institution to request a
13 certain health examination and consent form or other
14 statement from the student's health care provider to
15 verify the student's biological sex under certain
16 circumstances

 

[TOP]

Nope. Incorrect.

Not according to the actual text of the law.

The law says the ONLY WAY a dispute can be resolved is by genital inspection.

There will be no dispute after the birth certificate school records previous medical records and DNA have been explored...

 

[AProudLefty]

Cope.

 

[TOP]

Then what is this:


9 requiring that a
10 student's school or institution, as applicable,
11 resolve disputes regarding the student's sex;
12 requiring the school or institution to request a
13 certain health examination and consent form or other
14 statement from the student's health care provider to
15 verify the student's biological sex under certain
16 circumstances

if there is a dispute and there won't be... but if it did happen...this bill offers options and it says nothing about your mandatory genital inspections..lol I'm sorry to dash your concerns but you can relax now

 

[LV426]

There will be no dispute

Then why does the bill provide for remedies?

 

[LV426]

and there won't be.

According to the law there will be under certain circumstances. That's why they wrote it into the bill.

Unless you're going to now say that pervert Conservatives pass useless bills...which isn't a ringing endorsement of pervert Conservatism.

Pervert Conservatives absolutely believed there will be disputes because they laid out specifically how those disputes are to be settled with genital inspections of children.

 

[TOP]

Then why does the bill provide for remedies?

Why are you concerned?

 

[LV426]

.this bill offers options and it says nothing about your mandatory genital inspections

You're lying because you've never read the bill.

It does not offer options to resolve a dispute.

It says quite plainly that a genital inspection is required to resolve a dispute.

So now you're disagreeing with what the law says because you don't want to admit that you support protecting perverts with it.

 

[AProudLefty]

Why don't you just show me an example of where it's been necessary to apply the bill...? The one you're so very concerned about and you don't even live in Florida... you don't have children... you're not a coach... but if you want to continue crying for no reason I'll be happy to continue to remind you... that this isn't an issue...

So he shouldn't be concerned about child abuse in Florida because he doesn't live there?

And you're the one who claimed to care deeply about special needs students.

 

[LV426]

Why are you concerned?

I've answered that already.

Why does the bill provide for remedies for a dispute if disputes will never occur?

You have never answered that question because if you did, you'd have to admit that the bill is designed to protect perverts, not children.

 

[AProudLefty]

Why are you worried?

Says the "special needs teacher".

 

[LV426]

Says the "special needs teacher".

I've also answered that a dozen times, but Top keeps retreating to it because she's stalling.

 

[AProudLefty]

Birth records, previous medical records, and school records work great...

She's losing it. Epic!

 

[LV426]

Why are you concerned?

Are you drunk and that's why you can't seem to remember any of the times I've answered this question?

Is that why you keep asking it? Because you're drunk?

 

[TOP]

According to the law there will be under certain circumstances. That's why they wrote it into the bill.

Unless you're going to now say that pervert Conservatives pass useless bills...which isn't a ringing endorsement of pervert Conservatism.

Pervert Conservatives absolutely believed there will be disputes because they laid out specifically how those disputes are to be settled with genital inspections of children.

You do not have to worry about those circumstances... there aren't going to be any disputes that can't be settled... in fact this bill may very well the thing that was necessary to prevent it from ever having to be used... would it have been simpler to Simply remind parents and coaches that girls are to play on girls teams and boys are to play on boys? Absolutely... some people simply don't understand that so if they try to make it an issue then this law is in place to require that there be proof... be it a birth certificate school records or previous medical records that the child is in fact playing the girls team is she is a girl and the boys team if he is a boy... so very probably a bill that never will never have to be used... sorry but that's the way it is...

 

[LV426]

She's losing it. Epic!

She knows that the bill doesn't say those things are acceptable forms of proof to resolve a dispute, she's just stalling now.

 

[AProudLefty]

No, more like corruption is the new normal.

Yep. The MAGA folks are corrupted.

 

[LV426]

You do not have to worry about those circumstances..

Of course I do because the bill specifically sets out how those are to be resolved.

So now you're denying what the bill even says because you're stalling.

 

[AProudLefty]

Voter turnout is irrelevant nowadays. The game is now all about the printing, distributing, collecting, adjudicating, and counting of ballots. The DNC is doing all of this, meanwhile the RNC is not. Thus, the DNC will win the ballot collection game once again.

Voter turnout is only relevant in elections, and elections are not being held anymore.

You need to be jailed for treason.

 

[TOP]

I've answered that already.

Why does the bill provide for remedies for a dispute if disputes will never occur?

You have never answered that question because if you did, you'd have to admit that the bill is designed to protect perverts, not children.

Why are you concerned? This absolutely does protect children as a matter of fact... I'm not surprised you don't understand that...